Radio-Info.com

Radio-Info.com Discussion Boards
Login November 21, 2009, 04:31:48 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The "Q" Isn't for You...Any Longer???  (Read 4611 times)
waunderlust
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 160


« Reply #60 on: July 07, 2008, 11:46:50 AM »

Who cares about website comments? I didn't know Arbitron included websites in their numbers...

If less than less than 1% call your station, less than less than less than 1% will comment on your website unless they're disconnected geeks like us....Wink
Logged
pell guy
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 57


« Reply #61 on: July 07, 2008, 09:39:57 PM »

First weekend of "Cool 92 & 100,pretty good,like the presentation and the jocks for the most part.,
music beds under jocks voices at every break gets annoying. Some of the 80s stuff we could do without i.e "Power of Love",
by Huey Lewis.
Logged
marker101
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 117


« Reply #62 on: July 08, 2008, 12:08:48 PM »

Quote from: waunderlust
Who cares about website comments? I didn't know Arbitron included websites in their numbers..

I know, I know they don't.  I said it was interesting to read them.  Cheesy
Logged
NT3
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 24


« Reply #63 on: July 09, 2008, 12:32:57 PM »

Quote from: waunderlust
Who cares about website comments? I didn't know Arbitron included websites in their numbers..

I know, I know they don't.  I said it was interesting to read them.  Cheesy

They're gone now. I guess somebody finally realized that having a website loaded with negative listener comments was a bad idea.
Logged
Nairda
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 122


« Reply #64 on: July 09, 2008, 06:52:42 PM »

There was probably a meeting about that
Logged
RK
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 90


« Reply #65 on: July 12, 2008, 01:56:46 PM »

I LOATHE the name: Classic Hits Radio used by 92.1/100.1. It should be called CLASSICS or OLDIES.

For example here's a brief description (taken by a few well respected websites within the radio community).

Definitions of the "Classic Hits" format...

    * Classic hits is a radio format which generally includes oldies music from the 1960s, 1970s, and, in some cases, the 1980s.

    * Most of the late 90's and 21st-century versions, however, are based on a music library mostly consisting of [classic rock-style] hits from the 1970s. Variations of the core playlist vary greatly and include playlists composed of only pop-leaning classic rock.

Take a look at WHLM FM 103.5 from Berwick and the playlist from 92.1/100.1, they're as different as night & day, but both image themselves as "Classic Hits" stations.
« Last Edit: July 12, 2008, 02:01:02 PM by RK » Logged
MrRF
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 62


« Reply #66 on: July 13, 2008, 06:26:36 AM »

While I also do not care for Classic Hits Radio as an on-air format discriptor, people in the business often look at these things differently than the consumer does.Time will tell us that outcome.One might say there are conflicting messages in the imaging of the station which will not help it brand itself, but thats for another thread and is subjective.
It is not, however, inaccurate. A Classic can be called something that endures the test of time. A hit is a song that was a big seller, it successfully charted. Based on that, it is surely a Classic Hits station. As to the broad differential between WQFM and WHLM, there were a lot of hits to choose from in that era of Pop music. Many AC stations are the same format yet sound much differently. Also many rock stations, talk stations, etc.
« Last Edit: July 13, 2008, 06:28:08 AM by MrRF » Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radio-Info.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radio-Info.com or its parent in3 media, inc. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radio-Info.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE. 13

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 1.201 seconds with 19 queries.