Radio-Info.com

Radio-Info.com Discussion Boards
Login November 21, 2009, 03:37:12 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 94.5 FM Format Flip in Birmingham!  (Read 13835 times)
Charles1
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 195


« Reply #40 on: July 07, 2008, 11:56:25 PM »

Wow Just what we don't need another Country station. Angry

Personally I would love to see them come back as the old I95 and go head to head with the Q.

Correct me if I'm wrong but as long as the Q has been moved to Birmingham  I don't think they have ever had

another CHR go head to head with them.

I thought at one time or another that 97.3 was CHR.

97.3 signed on as CHR in '98, using the handle Hot 97.3.  They were actually a better sounding station than the Q was, but their weak Class A signal barely covered Jefferson County.  They flipped to active rock in '99...then went Oldies in '01...then all-70's in '04, only to go country later in '04.
Logged
icycool7227
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 804

Future Program Director and On-Air DJ


« Reply #41 on: July 08, 2008, 12:03:17 AM »

Well glad I don't live in Birmingham! Wish I could have airchecked WYSF -0 anyone have one? I don't expect it but would be so nice.
Logged
duncanalausa
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 104


« Reply #42 on: July 08, 2008, 07:41:17 AM »

i listened yesterday from about 530pm till 615 pm as i drove home (I20 from eastlake to 411n to odenville).  typical country hit mix, but the coverage was great.  good stereo seperation (except on a couple of tunes and all the local commercials.  the couple of songs sounded like kazaa downloads at @160kbps and the local spots were flat and mono.

i'd give it a solid 7.5.
Logged
whitfm
Whit
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1014


« Reply #43 on: July 08, 2008, 08:56:10 AM »

the couple of songs sounded like kazaa downloads at @160kbps and the local spots were flat and mono.

That was the same way 94.5 sounded when they first signed on with Hot AC last year. It only lasted for a few days, presumably until they could get a full playlist and on-air presentation implemented.
Logged
eleslie
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1


« Reply #44 on: July 08, 2008, 04:46:22 PM »

its wierd, i read about this while i was out of town, loved 94.5, sad to hear it had gone country, but when i got in town today - it was simulcasting wjox with 100.5 - which part of the reason 94.5 changed formats like 6 months ago when jox took over 100.5 the X

I have scoured al.com trying to find out why the flip, the last thing we need is another country station that will die to The Bull or WZZK
Logged
Zach
curious bystander
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1167

5 out of 4 people don't understand fractions.


« Reply #45 on: July 08, 2008, 09:01:03 PM »

the couple of songs sounded like kazaa downloads at @160kbps and the local spots were flat and mono.

Back a few years ago when I still lived in B'ham every song sounded like "kazaa downloads @160kbps".   Or really, 96kbps.  Them and Rock 99 (and The X) were by far the worst sounding stations in the market.  They still are, from what I heard recently.

I specifically remember though during the Y-94.5 years a period of time where one song would be in stereo, then one in mono.  Then one in stereo, then one in mono.  It went on like that for what seemed like forever. 

Some fine engineering there, huh?
Logged
BlueWanderer
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 192


« Reply #46 on: July 08, 2008, 11:36:51 PM »

Back a few years ago when I still lived in B'ham every song sounded like "kazaa downloads @160kbps".   Or really, 96kbps.  Them and Rock 99 (and The X) were by far the worst sounding stations in the market.  They still are, from what I heard recently.

I specifically remember though during the Y-94.5 years a period of time where one song would be in stereo, then one in mono.  Then one in stereo, then one in mono.  It went on like that for what seemed like forever. 

Some fine engineering there, huh?

I must admit that The X during its 107.7 days did sound compressed at times when I compare the songs between radio quality and regular cd quality.

The whole one song in stereo, then another in mono shift I don't like. That "shift" happens a lot on stations like WRTT that will mix new rock with old rock. I think it's the aged, old rock copies they're using which causing the problem and not an engineering issue.   
Logged
dangyankee
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1


« Reply #47 on: July 09, 2008, 03:09:58 PM »

understand that Cox is flipping 97.3 urban and putting the Rickey Smiley show on that freq next week. Allot of format flips in Birmingham.
Logged
b5
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 126


« Reply #48 on: July 09, 2008, 07:38:59 PM »

If Cox flips 97.3 Urban, where will the Rick and Bubba replay go?
Logged

Brian Harris
rtech
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 6


« Reply #49 on: July 09, 2008, 07:52:57 PM »

Back a few years ago when I still lived in B'ham every song sounded like "kazaa downloads @160kbps".   Or really, 96kbps.  Them and Rock 99 (and The X) were by far the worst sounding stations in the market.  They still are, from what I heard recently.

I specifically remember though during the Y-94.5 years a period of time where one song would be in stereo, then one in mono.  Then one in stereo, then one in mono.  It went on like that for what seemed like forever. 

Some fine engineering there, huh?

I must admit that The X during its 107.7 days did sound compressed at times when I compare the songs between radio quality and regular cd quality.

The whole one song in stereo, then another in mono shift I don't like. That "shift" happens a lot on stations like WRTT that will mix new rock with old rock. I think it's the aged, old rock copies they're using which causing the problem and not an engineering issue.   
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radio-Info.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radio-Info.com or its parent in3 media, inc. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radio-Info.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE. 14

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.756 seconds with 17 queries.