RadioDiscussions.com

 
Login June 19, 2013, 04:52:58 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: DTV transition claims more stations  (Read 1608 times)
dhett
OTA Holdout
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3672

Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.


DTV transition claims more stations
« on: March 31, 2009, 09:40:46 AM »

TV station KBGH, channel 19, Filer ID (Twin Falls area) decided that because of the manner in which they used the station, it was not economically feasible to make the digital transition.  The station was used solely for on-air educational courses, and was dark when no courses were being offered.  Twin Falls already has a public television station, KIPT channel 13.

On February 17, KBGH ceased broadcasting and today, the FCC deleted the station's call sign.

The call sign for TV station KYUK-TV, channel 4, Bethel AK was also deleted on 3/20.  Although they had been approved to build a digital station on channel 3, KYUK never did, and did not renew their license during the last renewal period (2006 for AK).  The KYUK AM/TV website, kyuk.org, says nothing about the shutdown and while it is unknown if the cost of the DTV conversion is the reason, it is plausible.  The city of Bethel continues to operate two LPTV stations.

Also attributable in part to the cost of building and operating a digital station alongside an analog was WYLE of Florence AL, although given their circumstances, they probably would have gone under even without the digital transition.

Another station scheduled to cease broadcasting is WDCP, channel 19, University Center MI, who had been using their station at Delta College and a satellite station licensed to Bad Axe, WDCQ channel 35, to cover Bay City/Saginaw and the "thumb" of Michigan.  The digital signal of WDCQ pretty much covers the area served by both analog signals.  Delta College had requested to take WDCP dark February 17; can anyone from the area confirm that this has happened?  The FCC has not yet deleted the call sign.
Logged

Dave
facebook.com/david.hettesheimer
w9wi
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4313


Re: DTV transition claims more stations
« Reply #1 on: March 31, 2009, 10:54:08 AM »

Also attributable in part to the cost of building and operating a digital station alongside an analog was WYLE of Florence AL, although given their circumstances, they probably would have gone under even without the digital transition.

They did make some effort (weak as it was!) to retain their license.  It seems the FCC didn't buy 24 hours of color bars as "broadcasting", and they fell afoul of the "one year off the air and you're out" law.

To be perfectly honest I think they'd stand at least a 50/50 chance of resurrecting their license on appeal.  There has been a VERY hands-off attitude towards what programming a station carries, and while an ordinary viewer certainly wouldn't consider a test pattern "broadcasting" I think a good case could be made that from a legal standpoint, it is.  Whether they can afford the legal fees to launch such an appeal is another question. 

(and indeed, there's a fair chance they'd still go under anyway...)



A station that recently "un-deleted" themselves is WFUP-45 in Vanderbilt, Mich..  (10 miles north of Gaylord in the northern Lower Peninsula)  They'd refused to file a DTV application, planning on using co-owned WFQX-DT 47 Cadillac to cover both stations' analog service areas. 

The stations were then sold, and the new owners decided they wanted to keep WFUP after all.  I think they'd already lost their second channel, but they now have a CP to flash-cut to digital on channel 45.



KLEP-17, a tiny station operated by an Arkansas school district, surrendered their analog license at the very beginning of the transition. 
Logged
tripinva
RabbitEars Webmaster
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1623


Re: DTV transition claims more stations
« Reply #2 on: March 31, 2009, 11:09:20 AM »

WFUP's second channel was 59, so it's not like they could have kept it anyway.

While we're on the subject of questionable licenses, can anyone shed some light on KIDA in Sun Valley, ID?  The station asked for a UHF digital on channel 32, then got it moved back to 5, and as of yet still has not filed for a construction permit for that channel 5.  Do they lose their license if they don't have a CP on file on June 12?

- Trip
Logged

RabbitEars.Info has launched!  Check it out!
TheRover
FM UNDERGROUND
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1556

The Internet is the Future of Listening to Music


Re: DTV transition claims more stations
« Reply #3 on: March 31, 2009, 11:10:39 AM »

Showing educational courses ? ? ?

Well, in the "real" world of the FCC, Public Service is "Info-Mercials".

Yeah.... that IS the world you and I live in !

Logged

azumanga
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 5006


Re: DTV transition claims more stations
« Reply #4 on: March 31, 2009, 07:31:27 PM »

Another station scheduled to cease broadcasting is WDCP, channel 19, University Center MI, who had been using their station at Delta College and a satellite station licensed to Bad Axe, WDCQ channel 35, to cover Bay City/Saginaw and the "thumb" of Michigan.  The digital signal of WDCQ pretty much covers the area served by both analog signals.  Delta College had requested to take WDCP dark February 17; can anyone from the area confirm that this has happened?  The FCC has not yet deleted the call sign.

According to their website, the station will honor the June 12 switchoff date -- I assume it's for both stations, as no mention of WDCP was made:

http://www3.delta.edu/broadcasting/news-dtv.html

Showing educational courses ? ? ?

Well, in the "real" world of the FCC, Public Service is "Info-Mercials".

Not if the station is on an educational license.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.219 seconds with 19 queries.