Radio-Info.com

Radio-Info.com Discussion Boards
Login March 20, 2010, 01:42:39 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Bay Area radio sucks  (Read 1384 times)
DyingMedium
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 376


« Reply #10 on: May 27, 2009, 02:21:12 PM »

ClearChannel has pushed lots of ideas in the past 10 years..."less is more" (NOT), HD radio (stillborn).  "Retraining" is another great CC strategy.  "Hey, we're changing the rules...so, it's cume now...cuz we say so". 

With that kind of thinking, it's no wonder CC continues to have massive debt problems and revenue problems.

Guru...e-mailing a PD is like peeing on a forest fire. 

"They may actually surprise you with a reasonable response in return!"  Uh, no...they won't.  And if they do, it's usually because they have nothing else to do and the station is already in the ratings crapper.

The OP's statements crossed several formats...Plus, they are legitimate programming concerns.  Weekend programming - especially in music formats - can and has helped built long term station loyalty.

...I think I hear the Seattle Board calling you! Why don't you go rain up there?   Wink

--Cynical Parrot (think I'll change my username!)



Logged

Greed has ruined radio...for now.
Manny Michaels
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 90


« Reply #11 on: May 27, 2009, 05:38:09 PM »

Daily and monthly cume (which in most cases is showing up as larger than measured by diaries) is becoming the important measure.

First off, bravo to Dick Skinner.  Great post.  "Shares" generally are viewed by programmers as their report card.  "Ratings" are what the sales folks use to develop their CPMs for advertisers. Thanks for providing some clarity and hopefully a little knowledge take away for many of the folks who are not in our business who read and post here.

I also, believe, SFStatic, you're mistaken.  In the year or so I've been working in PPM markets, I've yet to run into anyone from the ad world (station side or client side) who thinks cume is now the gold standard. The larger cumes are truly impressive.  But, the fact is, while cumes have dramatically increased, the vast majority of the increase are from people who are extremely light (P3 and lower) listeners who contribute very little to the share of the station.  While cume truly shows the "circulation" of a station, it's not a very good indication of how many people might actually hear your ad.  That's what the advertiser is interested in. The age old adage rings true and at a recent ARB PPM seminar, they even acknowledged it:  in round numbers, 25% of your listeners give you 75% of your ratings (share/rating, not cume)   This is one reason just a few PPM devices can truly change a stations' performance. I also know of no programming types (again that I personally know of) who are compensated on increasing the cume of the station.  It's all based on SHARE or SHARE RANK in specific target demos based on the station.  (That is of course, if you are lucky enough to receive some kind of comp based on ratings at all....whether air talent or programmer). 

Dick Skinner, I'd love to hear your thoughts...

I agree, Raydiohead.  I've never been bonused on cume...only on ranking of share in specific demos which are calculated off of AQH.  In my opinion, AQH is coin of the realm.   
Logged
TVradioguru
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 379


« Reply #12 on: May 27, 2009, 08:31:51 PM »


--Cynical Parrot (think I'll change my username!


If you like that one, I've got some others that would fit your attitude also!
Logged
Starbucks
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 506


« Reply #13 on: May 27, 2009, 10:13:47 PM »

There is no specialty weekends at all, only live 105 and KMEL are doing something, but that is too boring. Where is the 80's or 90's weekend or a party songs weekend on KOIT or Star 101.3? That is why the ratings are so low for bay area radio, the highest rated station is at 5 while in other markets the highest rated station is 8 or higher. OK rant over

Re: Bay Area radio sucks (real creativity). Don't you have anything else better to do or write. We know it sucks, but go somewhere else find an ipod or internet or  something and listen. Your on the Internet anyway, when you composed the heading of this thread. you could've listen to Shoutcast, or Pandora while surfing.
That sucks, this sucks, that sucks, god...I feel like I'm reading kindergarten post.
Logged
Questor
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 80

PMS Man: Promotions, Management & Sales


« Reply #14 on: June 03, 2009, 01:39:34 PM »

Drive across the country. It sucks everywhere.

Does driving from my desktop or laptop count?

I actually stream several stations from other states (e.g., Mix 100 in Lubbock, TX) and 102.1 Chico Oldies closer to home.  I find their song selections vastly superior to what's out here in the Bay Area.

In fact, when I have out-of-town visitors, they tell me that's one of the things they notice first about the Bay Area is how poor the radio selection of music is.  It's funny because one of my other lives is as a musician, and the people who tell me this most don't play any instruments.  They also see/hear that most of the time at home I've got talk stations on because they're far more entertaining.

So I think other parts of the country are actually sounding better than we are.  It's so ironic to me, being in California and so close to Silicon Valley / San Francisco where we like to take this pride of being the starting point of everything.  If we are, I hope the dullness we have here musically doesn't spread nationwide.
Logged
Lkeller
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3433


« Reply #15 on: June 03, 2009, 03:36:19 PM »

Drive across the country. It sucks everywhere.

Does driving from my desktop or laptop count?

I actually stream several stations from other states (e.g., Mix 100 in Lubbock, TX) and 102.1 Chico Oldies closer to home.  I find their song selections vastly superior to what's out here in the Bay Area.

In fact, when I have out-of-town visitors, they tell me that's one of the things they notice first about the Bay Area is how poor the radio selection of music is.  It's funny because one of my other lives is as a musician, and the people who tell me this most don't play any instruments.  They also see/hear that most of the time at home I've got talk stations on because they're far more entertaining.

So I think other parts of the country are actually sounding better than we are.  It's so ironic to me, being in California and so close to Silicon Valley / San Francisco where we like to take this pride of being the starting point of everything.  If we are, I hope the dullness we have here musically doesn't spread nationwide.


This makes sense when you think about it. I spend some time in the north state, and have also found the music selection to be "superior" in many cases, even though the presentation (liners, jocks, etc.) can be amateurish.  But obviously, these are not big market stations.  If you're the only classic hits, AC, or whatever format station for 5 counties in all 4 directions, you don't have to worry if your play list isn't filled with only the most desirable (heavily researched) songs. 

I've heard some great classic rock and oldies songs on Redding stations - songs I haven't heard in years.  But the thrill is mostly just the novelty of hearing them after so long. If I lived there 12 months a year and had to listen to those songs ad nauseum, they probably become "the same tired Oldies" after awhile.
Logged
Michael Rivers Kramer
rimember

Online Online

Posts: 746

Music Programmer


« Reply #16 on: June 03, 2009, 10:44:51 PM »

Drive across the country. It sucks everywhere.

Does driving from my desktop or laptop count?

I actually stream several stations from other states (e.g., Mix 100 in Lubbock, TX) and 102.1 Chico Oldies closer to home.  I find their song selections vastly superior to what's out here in the Bay Area.

In fact, when I have out-of-town visitors, they tell me that's one of the things they notice first about the Bay Area is how poor the radio selection of music is.  It's funny because one of my other lives is as a musician, and the people who tell me this most don't play any instruments.  They also see/hear that most of the time at home I've got talk stations on because they're far more entertaining.

So I think other parts of the country are actually sounding better than we are.  It's so ironic to me, being in California and so close to Silicon Valley / San Francisco where we like to take this pride of being the starting point of everything.  If we are, I hope the dullness we have here musically doesn't spread nationwide.


This makes sense when you think about it. I spend some time in the north state, and have also found the music selection to be "superior" in many cases, even though the presentation (liners, jocks, etc.) can be amateurish.  But obviously, these are not big market stations.  If you're the only classic hits, AC, or whatever format station for 5 counties in all 4 directions, you don't have to worry if your play list isn't filled with only the most desirable (heavily researched) songs. 

I've heard some great classic rock and oldies songs on Redding stations - songs I haven't heard in years.  But the thrill is mostly just the novelty of hearing them after so long. If I lived there 12 months a year and had to listen to those songs ad nauseum, they probably become "the same tired Oldies" after awhile.

What you experienced was an OH WOW event. When you here those same low testing songs again and again...the oh wow becomes OH...NO.

Everytime lower testing songs are removed from playlist the average listener perceives a better variety.  One creative way to play OH WOW songs  and NOT turn them into OH NO songs is to present a feature with a large category of OH WOW songs.

Even if the particular Redding station were transplanted with a slick presentation, it would probably get creamed by the local "researched" offerings.

What many people who are on this board don't realize is that fi you listen to a lot if radio, you will get board easily.  The average radio listener doesn't listen as much as the people on the air or the super radio fans that read this board and keep up with the industry.

I for one and a radio junkie, but that has faded Now I listen to my I-tunes collection and  NPR programming online more often.
Logged

Los Angeles
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radio-Info.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radio-Info.com or its parent in3 media, inc. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radio-Info.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE. 11

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.523 seconds with 19 queries.