Radio-Info.com

Radio-Info.com Discussion Boards
Login March 20, 2010, 02:45:28 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Will 1480 AM Night Signal Every Improve?  (Read 2400 times)
gabigley1
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 861


« Reply #20 on: June 09, 2009, 08:33:36 AM »

They announced on the air that they moved to their new studio in Blue Ash over the weekend.
Logged
FRR
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 407


« Reply #21 on: June 11, 2009, 07:07:24 AM »

They announced on the air that they moved to their new studio in Blue Ash over the weekend.

Any news of the signal problem?
Logged
RF4U
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 29


« Reply #22 on: June 13, 2009, 09:27:54 PM »

Don't forget. We are at the bottom of the sunspot cycle.
Also. anyone listen to AM 740 Toronto at night ? Lots of oldies.
Logged
Icangelp
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 259


« Reply #23 on: June 13, 2009, 10:51:10 PM »

Elsewhere on the site there is a brief reference to the FCC granting AM stations local FM translators for "fill-in" of service. Might work for WDJO.
Logged
BobOnTheJob
Indiana's Circuit Ridin' Radio Engineer
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1882


« Reply #24 on: June 14, 2009, 07:37:47 AM »

Elsewhere on the site there is a brief reference to the FCC granting AM stations local FM translators for "fill-in" of service. Might work for WDJO.
All they need to do is find an already existing translator, buy it & ask the FCC to allow 1480 to use it. The catch is, if there isn't one available, they can't drop one in. And with a coverage area as large as Cincinnati, they'd need several of them to have any real impact. Even if they did get a half dozen of them (all on different frequencies), how do you promote that on air? Plus, they'd be esentially worthless for in-car reception with a typical range of 5-6 miles (on second thought, that's better than WDJO's night signal). However, having one located in the heart of downtown would put them in line for some in-office listening.
Logged

When I started in radio in 1967, most broadcast equipment used tube technology, all recorded music was played from records on a turntable by live DJ's, there was no satellite delivery...and radio was fun.
skippertthomas
"Get Busy Living, or Get Busy Dying"...Shawshank Redemption..
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 906

"I've been everywhere!" Quote: Johnny Cash


« Reply #25 on: June 15, 2009, 12:40:12 AM »

Radio-Info news flash... Looks that the FCC will discuss with the hope of pronouncing guidelines in the upcoming meeting on how to get an FM Translator-1 service for certain criteria AM stations... My inside ENG people tell me they are leaning to: 1...Daytimers, first  2...500 watts and under at night AM's with no current FM service owned by the AM  3...Then under-performing AM's (ol' Class IV with skywave problems) that are first, stand alone and second owned along with an FM in the market, if anything is left....  The big question they ponder is a 'window' for allowing this service to mature into existance... As a guy looking at a stand alone AM or two, this is a major smile on my face... At least they are considering.....   Cool
Logged

I choose to LIVE...John 10:10...
R.E."Skip"Spence
Ready to jump back into radio fulltime!  So I am the Owner/GM of DuckRiverBroadasting that takes on a "Lease To Buy" on WMRB in Columbia, TN as of November 1st.... 910/"TheDuck"......
KyDXIn
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 809


« Reply #26 on: June 15, 2009, 11:25:35 PM »

Don't forget. We are at the bottom of the sunspot cycle.
Also. anyone listen to AM 740 Toronto at night ? Lots of oldies.
Listening to them as we type.  Nightly routine is to tune into the "Theatre of the Mind" program of old radio shows, then listen to the oldies til I go to bed.

www.am740.ca
Logged
jry
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 131


« Reply #27 on: June 16, 2009, 08:10:15 PM »

You would be surprised at how far a 200 watt translator will cover. If you are lucky enough to get 250 watts, well......
Logged
BobOnTheJob
Indiana's Circuit Ridin' Radio Engineer
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1882


« Reply #28 on: June 17, 2009, 12:30:38 PM »

You would be surprised at how far a 200 watt translator will cover. If you are lucky enough to get 250 watts, well......

Depends on the height. There's a 150 watt translator at 300' near here & it rocks. You can tell what song is playing at 20 miles in most directions.
Logged

When I started in radio in 1967, most broadcast equipment used tube technology, all recorded music was played from records on a turntable by live DJ's, there was no satellite delivery...and radio was fun.
Icangelp
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 259


« Reply #29 on: June 19, 2009, 03:42:14 PM »

Don't forget. We are at the bottom of the sunspot cycle.
Also. anyone listen to AM 740 Toronto at night ? Lots of oldies.
I am directly in the path of the nortwest lobe of the mighty 30 watt night signal from WNOP. As a result, WNOP comes in like a local where I live. If I want to have any chance of picking up Toronto, I'm forced to drive really far, like 2 miles north of my home.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radio-Info.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radio-Info.com or its parent in3 media, inc. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radio-Info.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE. 12

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 1.339 seconds with 19 queries.