Radio-Info.com

Radio-Info.com Discussion Boards
Login November 21, 2009, 04:01:34 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The Sun of London: Shocking findings from Jackson's autopsy  (Read 656 times)
WMC2006
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4377


« on: June 30, 2009, 07:16:49 AM »

According to The Sun,  emaciated, complete loss of hair, skin cancer, nothing in stomach aside from dissolved pills and more:

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/2505693/The-shock-findings-of-the-Michael-Jackson-autopsy.html
Logged
Silkie
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2476


« Reply #1 on: June 30, 2009, 07:18:56 PM »

According to The Sun,  emaciated, complete loss of hair, skin cancer, nothing in stomach aside from dissolved pills and more:

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/2505693/The-shock-findings-of-the-Michael-Jackson-autopsy.html

He lived as long as his lifestyle permitted.  Simple as that.
Logged

A law repugnant to the Constitution is void. - U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall (Judicial review of Congressional acts is a good thing)
aunti-terrestrial
cynical optimist
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 502


« Reply #2 on: June 30, 2009, 07:38:34 PM »

It's the Sun. I'd believe Harvey Levin (TMZ) over the Sun. I wouldn't believe the LA County coronor's office at all, except that TMZ backed them up.

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1892820/michael_jackson_leaked_autopsy_not.html?cat=33

Maybe the best thing to do is actually wait until the results are published by a credible source.
Logged
landtuna
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1716


« Reply #3 on: June 30, 2009, 07:46:08 PM »

Maybe the best thing to do is actually wait until the results are published by a credible source.

Or maybe multiple sources.

One thing leaped out at me reading that story and that was the parentage of the two oldest children.  When I saw their pictures online the first thing that occurred to me was neither had "black" attributes.  Nor did either look as if they were offspring of a mixed union.  Looking at even more recent photos of both kids is further proof.

I don't know what to think but if MJ was not the bio father things might start getting really ugly when the issue of who raises them comes up.
Logged
aunti-terrestrial
cynical optimist
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 502


« Reply #4 on: June 30, 2009, 09:33:40 PM »

Actually, Debbie Rowe has already answered that. I believe I read that she admitted that Michael Jackson paid her, she was inseminated with an anonymous donor (which means, not MJ), and she gave all rights to the children to MJ upon birth. The marriage was a farce which ended after the birth of the second child, when she couldn't produce more.

I'd be more concerned about the third child's anonymous surrogate mother. Then again, nobody may ever hear from her again.

Logged
raptusregaliter
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 657


« Reply #5 on: July 01, 2009, 09:24:00 AM »

This is old news now, but multiple sources are reporting that the biological father of the first two kids is Jackson's (white) dermatologist--this guy was also Debbie Rowe's boss.  Neither Rowe nor Jackson has ANY biological connection to the children.  Rowe was just an incubator since she was implanted with the already-fertilized eggs.  Oh, and Jackson never bothered to formally adopt the kids, so the lawyers will be having a field day with this for years to come.
Logged
aunti-terrestrial
cynical optimist
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 502


« Reply #6 on: July 01, 2009, 11:40:41 AM »

Yeah, I saw that this morning. Those poor kids.

Money buys you everything, including children. Why aren't people calling this what it is: a series of black-market adoptions?
Logged
dmargalotti
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2430


« Reply #7 on: July 01, 2009, 05:13:16 PM »

Quote
Yeah, I saw that this morning. Those poor kids.

Money buys you everything, including children. Why aren't people calling this what it is: a series of black-market adoptions?

Those poor kids is right.  Although, this could make for a very special episode of The Maury Povich Show.

 Grin Wink
Logged
Bongwater
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2128

The Shadow Lord Of NW Radio.......


« Reply #8 on: July 01, 2009, 07:24:42 PM »

Quote
Yeah, I saw that this morning. Those poor kids.

Money buys you everything, including children. Why aren't people calling this what it is: a series of black-market adoptions?

Those poor kids is right.  Although, this could make for a very special episode of The Maury Povich Show.

 Grin Wink

8 stone...that's 112 lbs....YEOW! (14 lbs = 1 stone in UK measurement) I weigh TWICE that much....



Logged

Where Are We Going And Why Am I In This Handbasket?
WMC2006
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4377


« Reply #9 on: July 01, 2009, 11:13:45 PM »

Quote
Yeah, I saw that this morning. Those poor kids.

Money buys you everything, including children. Why aren't people calling this what it is: a series of black-market adoptions?

Those poor kids is right.  Although, this could make for a very special episode of The Maury Povich Show.

 Grin Wink

If this was the 80s, it would be A Very Special Diff'rent Strokes or A Very Special Blossom    Cheesy
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radio-Info.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radio-Info.com or its parent in3 media, inc. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radio-Info.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE. 13

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 1.307 seconds with 19 queries.