Radio-Info.com

Radio-Info.com Discussion Boards
Login March 20, 2010, 06:35:01 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: SAM Broadcaster vs StationPlaylist - Questions  (Read 288 times)
LoungeLizard2
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 16

Off the Beach


« on: August 04, 2009, 01:41:11 AM »

Hello all -

Long time listener, first time caller---yada yada yada..

I'm setting up an internet station, and am curious if anyone knows which automation is better.  SAM seems to have a lot of support and the PAL language doesn't look too bad, while I read here that a lot of people like SPL versus others like Maestro or RCS or Simian.

What I would like is to hear from people who actually use either automation system or can make a suggestion.  Can y'all help me out?

The auto-system has to have a live assist, ease of use, ability to take a remote feed, ease of use, good music scheduling capabilities so it can run unassisted for overnights and be able to play hour long programs with jingles/adverts during breaks.  Oh yeah, it has to be easy to use.

Also, need a non-expensive solution for a hybrid/phone input to take callers -

Thanks for your input -
Logged

The Swing Shift Radio Show - The Future of Retro Radio!
V.Riley
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 373

Every station I love eventually changes formats.


« Reply #1 on: August 04, 2009, 07:00:17 AM »

I've experimented with SAM, and have used StationPlaylists since 2005.  I prefer StationPlaylist over SAM.  StationPlaylist from my view point seems to be more "professional" in its features and performance.  It really competes well with the big time packages that cost thousands of dollars.  Plus you don't need to do scripting to make it work well.

As for hooking up callers, I've heard of people using Skype and StationPlaylist along with people using a mixing board for land line calls and StationPlaylist, although I haven't done that my self so I couldn't give you details on that.  StationPlaylist does have a group on Yahoo Groups where you can join and ask "How Do I Do That" questions and such.  They are very responsive.

Of course my opinion could be biased.  Your opinion may be different.  Although you can't get the full feature set from a demo, you might want to try the demos of both and see which one you like best. 
Logged
Bill DeFelice
Computer & Broadcast Technologist
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1541

Past engineer of WMNR-FM, WMMM/WCFS-AM, WREF, WEBE


« Reply #2 on: August 04, 2009, 07:29:45 AM »

SAM was one of the systems I was looking at when I decided that system I was using was keeping me from have an even more professional sound. I didn't like all the windows and, at least for me, coming from the broadcast industry it didn't look friendly to me (or any of the folks assisting me with my webstream). I found somebody locally who had it running and I played with it. It hung once or twice and seemed a little too busy with all the little windows so it was easy to cross that one off the list.

I had actually seen StationPlaylist before so I was at least familiar with the software. I played with the demo for almost two months on a couple of machines before jumping in and purchasing it. It ended up as the best investment I ever made! For 8 months I had to run my station from a closet at a friends as I was between houses and had to fight with the local phone utility to get working DSL. In spite of some incorrect programming on my part, StationPlaylist kept things on the air without dead air. There was finally some peace of mind for me running the stream.

You can read about my journey as I authored the StationPlaylist Review for trade paper Radio World.
Logged

HobbyBroadcaster.net
The references for legal low-power license free broadcasting under FCC Part 15 regulations.
Legal & technical references, equipment reviews, how-to's and more!
davect
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 34


« Reply #3 on: August 04, 2009, 09:03:44 AM »

I've been using StationPlaylist for three years. I love it! Hear it action at http://www.softneasy.com
Logged
Interstate 78
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 389


« Reply #4 on: August 04, 2009, 02:07:15 PM »

My friends of friends at Kutztown University Radio http://kur.kutztown.edu/ use Jockey Pro http://www.11software.com/
Logged
V.Riley
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 373

Every station I love eventually changes formats.


« Reply #5 on: August 04, 2009, 03:31:31 PM »

My friends of friends at Kutztown University Radio http://kur.kutztown.edu/ use Jockey Pro http://www.11software.com/

Doesn't look good for Jockey Pro as the 11software website isn't loading at this moment.
Logged
Bill DeFelice
Computer & Broadcast Technologist
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1541

Past engineer of WMNR-FM, WMMM/WCFS-AM, WREF, WEBE


« Reply #6 on: August 04, 2009, 05:24:53 PM »

Doesn't look good for Jockey Pro as the 11software website isn't loading at this moment.

I checked it out before and it was there, although the most recent copyright date on the site is 2006! This was the software LPB use to sell to it's clients. Maybe they met a similar fate to the now-defunct LPB, Inc?
Logged

HobbyBroadcaster.net
The references for legal low-power license free broadcasting under FCC Part 15 regulations.
Legal & technical references, equipment reviews, how-to's and more!
Starbucks
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 506


« Reply #7 on: August 04, 2009, 08:58:22 PM »

Hands down.....Station playlist. I mentioned before, SAM is nothing but an over sophisticated cock pit. Then scripting , who has time to learn that , in case you prefer a top of the hour ID or your wheel to balance evey hour. Station Playlist is the way to go. SAM has lots of bells and whistles , and SP is set up basically in front of you as you see what is going on every song or spot that's played.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radio-Info.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radio-Info.com or its parent in3 media, inc. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radio-Info.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE. 13

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 1.345 seconds with 17 queries.