Radio-Info.com

Radio-Info.com Discussion Boards
Login November 21, 2009, 02:50:11 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Radio-Info.com Discussion Boards>SPECIALTY>Community Radio>Part 15 looked upon as irrelevent on Wikipedia
Pages: [1]   Go Down
« previous next »
  Print  
Author Topic: Part 15 looked upon as irrelevent on Wikipedia  (Read 285 times)
LibertyNT
Part 15 Operator
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 828

I Like AM
« on: September 10, 2009, 07:43:34 AM »
well i had enjoyed having a Wikipedia article for almost a month then someone nominates it for deletion. i tried hard  to save it but now it looks like its going away. if you want you can help save it at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/KEWS
« Last Edit: September 10, 2009, 07:47:10 AM by LibertyNT » Logged
Through The Static. Through The Noise. Theres a station somewhere.
99.9 The Crow- Good Time Oldies
------->Click Here For 99.9 The Crow<-------
edarmsttrong
RF Junkie
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 116

SBE Certified
« Reply #1 on: September 10, 2009, 09:44:19 AM »
I'm confused...how does this 'station ' get to keep it's wikipedia page???

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WRHS
Logged
"Modulating carriers since 1987"
kirkiefan
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 763
« Reply #2 on: September 11, 2009, 03:39:13 PM »
A Part 15 station would be more relavent if it serves a community that has no licesned stations,or if a local licensed station moved its studios to a larger municipality and/or owned by a cluster conglomerate.

A student ran Part 15 at a local college would also provice some relevency and community service.

Wikipedia now provides a category for "unlicensed stations" in the U.S.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Unlicensed_radio_stations_in_the_United_States
Logged
gunterm
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 373

Engineer Wannabe
« Reply #3 on: September 13, 2009, 09:37:28 PM »
Mentions an ERP of 5 watts, must be one of those unlicensed grandfathered in school stations.
Logged
Matt...

www.Oldies104.net - KRBX.com
Happy user of Orban Optimod PC-1100
We play the deep cuts
Nostalgia
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 168
« Reply #4 on: September 14, 2009, 10:20:53 AM »
Quote from: gunterm on September 13, 2009, 09:37:28 PM
Mentions an ERP of 5 watts, must be one of those unlicensed grandfathered in school stations.
OR, 100 milliwatts into 4" rigid feedline to a 20 bay RotoTiller at 200'!  No, wait, that would be illegal wouldnt it?!?!?!  Smiley
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
« previous next »
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radio-Info.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radio-Info.com or its parent in3 media, inc. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radio-Info.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE. 11

 Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 1.597 seconds with 19 queries.