Radio-Info.com

Radio-Info.com Discussion Boards
Login March 21, 2010, 01:07:42 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: No WQXR-96 staff moving to WQXR-106 ???  (Read 839 times)
radioman390
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3


« on: September 21, 2009, 05:16:12 AM »

Scott Fybush is reportiong in today's North East Radio Watch (NERW) that his sources say
not one current WQXR staffer will move from 122 Fifth to Varick Street.

Any confirmation?
Logged
DToTheJ
PD, The Cockroach - The Internet's Talk Superstation
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 6423

The Cockroach's Digital Conversion - June 12, 2010


« Reply #1 on: September 21, 2009, 05:18:50 AM »

With a source such as Scott Fybush, who needs confirmation?
Logged

For talk variety every weekend: The Cockroach - The Internet's Talk Superstation
For music variety 24/7: Radio Free Worcester or Great Big Radio
badjef
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 194


« Reply #2 on: September 21, 2009, 09:07:22 AM »

FWIW, the way I read all of this, the only resemblence to present 'QXR and 105.9's 'QXR is the call letters and "format".

Signal, freq., staff, location, ownership, licensee, ( am I forgetting anything?) will all be different.

Scott's right...as usual. Staff may or may not have been given the chance to apply for employment. That's too much inside baseball for this thread.

If you think about it, NYT could have sold the whole kit and kabodle to Univision. They carved it up into 2 pieces: signal and call sign.

Univision may have ended up with a tax advantage by taking the whole thing and then "donating" 105.9 to WNYC, Inc.
Or, even optioning it.

I'm not an accountant and not trying to play one here but I'm sure that might have been on the table.

NYT needed the money. That's why they sold.

NYT received more for the sale by doing what they did.

Personally, I'm glad what was done was done considering the other options and possibilities.

Jeff in Sa-ra-so-ta!
Logged

Jeff in Sa-ra-so-ta!
BruceS8852
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 360


« Reply #3 on: September 21, 2009, 09:54:51 AM »

It would have been poor public relations for the New York Times if classical music left the NYC airwaves.  I always remember hating it when the music teachers in high school forced us to listen to it.  I am glad it will still there for people who do enjoy Beethoven, Bach, Mozart, etc.

Bruce
Logged
badjef
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 194


« Reply #4 on: September 21, 2009, 11:59:12 AM »

It would have been poor public relations for the New York Times if classical music left the NYC airwaves. 

I don't think PR was in front of their minds. It was keeping one of their buttons in their cars in the format.

Quote
I always remember hating it when the music teachers in high school forced us to listen to it.  I am glad it will still there for people who do enjoy Beethoven, Bach, Mozart, etc.

Bruce

Yeah, at that time they still hired teachers who knew better. Grin Music appreciation is missing in the curriculum now.

Explains alot, eh?

Jeff in Sa-ra-so-ta
Logged

Jeff in Sa-ra-so-ta!
Cosmopolite
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 201


« Reply #5 on: September 21, 2009, 01:39:01 PM »

After years at QXR why would talent be expected to apply for their own jobs, take a pay cut, plus waste their musical knowledge and announcing skills on running "Beg-A-Thons."
Logged
Mark Jeffries
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 378


« Reply #6 on: September 21, 2009, 02:31:33 PM »

After years at QXR why would talent be expected to apply for their own jobs, take a pay cut, plus waste their musical knowledge and announcing skills on running "Beg-A-Thons."

But it's OK for them to read commercials?  I thought you elitists hated advertising.

And please explain to us how a non-commercial WQXR could stay in business without pledge drives.  Even with a Democratic White House and Congress, there is no way in hell that any public broadcasting funding schemes like the license fee that funds the BBC would be approved in this country--talk radio and Fox News would be screaming bloody murder.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radio-Info.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radio-Info.com or its parent in3 media, inc. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radio-Info.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE. 12

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.682 seconds with 19 queries.