Radio-Info.com

Radio-Info.com Discussion Boards
Login November 21, 2009, 08:13:45 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Better Sounding Stream  (Read 360 times)
beantownradio25
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 210


« on: September 23, 2009, 02:40:28 PM »

I've been doing internet radio for over a year, and am not so great when it comes to Engineering and the Technical side of things.

This certain station has been running since December 26, 2008.

I use SAM Broadcaster and use the DSP Audio Pipeline, and the stream sounds ehh i don't know, our main competitors have these squeaky clean sounding streams. I've rasied the pitch in an attempt to sound better and for a while I was constantly toying with the setting and EQ to make it sound better but I gave up.

http://216.155.130.9:8000/listen.pls

You can click there to listen live and the website is www.999thebeat.net for listen live links in windows media, real player etc.

What do you guys reccomend for a squeaky sounding stream? And I would like to know real opinions about the current quality of the stream, I'm not impressed with it at all when compared to our competitors, however the station is still managing great ratings due to a great lineup and a true urban playlist, and major market voiceover talent. Also, is the EQ right for a Hip Hop station? I'm running this thing by myself, besides the deejays it's all me.
« Last Edit: September 23, 2009, 02:42:53 PM by beantownradio25 » Logged

HD Radio is here to stay...
Timmy
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 639

Perfection is overrated...


« Reply #1 on: September 23, 2009, 05:20:49 PM »

Breakaway Live from www.ceaudio.com will give you killer FM-like processing on your stream. Check out the 30-day demos!
Logged

snailboy
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 86

Yeap....It's me.


« Reply #2 on: September 23, 2009, 10:21:26 PM »

I am using Sam and stream to Loudcity 96k sounds clean. I did turn off the Equalizer on the decks and I donot use a router. I stream straight from my computer to Loudcity. Hope this helps.
Logged

Mike Mann
President 
Zeus Broadcasting Group LLC
A Zeus Media Group Company
www.zeusbroadcasting.com
stuckinthe50s
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 26


« Reply #3 on: September 24, 2009, 07:35:17 PM »

I use SAM and stream to Live365.  I've turned off all processing in SAM and use the Winamp plug-in, Tomass Limiter.
http://www.winamp.com/plugins/details/95214
Sounds good and uses much less CPU time than the SAM processing.


Logged
unpwn
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 35


« Reply #4 on: September 25, 2009, 12:21:04 PM »

I use SAM and stream to Live365.  I've turned off all processing in SAM and use the Winamp plug-in, Tomass Limiter.
http://www.winamp.com/plugins/details/95214
Sounds good and uses much less CPU time than the SAM processing.

+1
Tomass Limiter is fantastic. Just remember to bypass all other default processing.
Logged
Timmy
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 639

Perfection is overrated...


« Reply #5 on: September 25, 2009, 12:58:54 PM »

I am using Sam and stream to Loudcity 96k sounds clean. I did turn off the Equalizer on the decks and I donot use a router. I stream straight from my computer to Loudcity. Hope this helps.

With sending your stream to Loudcity: Let's say your final stream (for the end users) is a 96kbps Stereo MP3 stream. Would you (or your listeners) benefit at all if you send Loudcity a greater than 96kbps master stream? Are you just wasting your own bandwidth by sending say a 192kbps stream? I'm talking about the listener's final sound quality.

I ask this as I host my own stream on my system and I use uncompressed wav files as source material. My stream is only a 64kbps AAC+ stream. I understand for processing, the less compression, the better. But in the above situation, I would be sending my processed wav files and compressing them with my stream to Loudcity.

I rambled there a bit, but I hope you got the main question.
Logged

snailboy
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 86

Yeap....It's me.


« Reply #6 on: September 25, 2009, 06:01:21 PM »

Timmy. I found if you use 192 or 128 kbps (my thoughts only) you are wasting bandwidth. 96kbps Stereo sounds clean and I have had people listen and you can't really tell 128kbps or 96kbps.
Logged

Mike Mann
President 
Zeus Broadcasting Group LLC
A Zeus Media Group Company
www.zeusbroadcasting.com
nitnitr
Bob
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 18


« Reply #7 on: September 27, 2009, 10:10:20 PM »

A 64K aac+ stream sounds just as good as a 128K mp3 stream if you are wishing to save bandwidth. The only drawback is that it won't play with most versions of WMP. iTunes v9 now is able to play aac+ streams if that is a consideration.

I use Station Playlist and also use Stereo Tool. Since Stereo Tool is a Winamp plugin, you should be able to use it with SAM. Stereo Tool is a bit resource intensive, but if you have the right box, you can get great sound with it.
Logged

Lead Me To The Rock Radio
Today's Christian Music
http://www.leadmetotherock.com
SUPERCASTER
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1709


« Reply #8 on: September 28, 2009, 12:36:51 AM »

Breakaway Live from www.ceaudio.com will give you killer FM-like processing on your stream. Check out the 30-day demos!

Agreed.
I tried the other software audio processsers and Breakaway is the best. Beats the expensive audio processor hardware boxes too.
Logged

"HD RADIO- MAKES FM SOUND LIKE AM, AND AM SOUND LIKE CRAP!"
gunterm
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 373

Engineer Wannabe


« Reply #9 on: October 21, 2009, 02:43:23 PM »

Breakaway is the best if you've got the horsepower for it, also look into the hardware solution of an Orban PC1100 if you've got the cash, they have a newer version out there as well now.
Logged

Matt...

www.Oldies104.net - KRBX.com
Happy user of Orban Optimod PC-1100
We play the deep cuts
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radio-Info.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radio-Info.com or its parent in3 media, inc. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radio-Info.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE. 11

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 1.324 seconds with 19 queries.