Radio-Info.com

Radio-Info.com Discussion Boards
Login March 19, 2010, 08:49:48 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: HD Honesty  (Read 464 times)
Play Freebird
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 751


« on: October 21, 2009, 07:51:54 PM »

I enjoyed reading the October issue of Crawford Broadcasting's engineering newsletter:

http://www.crawfordbroadcasting.com/~cbc/Local_Oscillator/October%202009%20Local%20Oscillator.pdf

CBC's western New York engineer Brian shares a candid but honest opinion; he has concluded that "public interest in HD-R is incapable of being revitalized."  Kudos to Cris Alexander for allowing this to be published, but according to the corporate interpretation, somehow Cris thinks the proximity of Buffalo and Rochester to Canada is to blame.  Yep, must be those socialists up north are out to sabotage HD Radio!

Meanwhile, other markets continue to have problems with their HD equipment.  Read about hard drive troubles with the "iBiquity Box" in the Chicago report and recent AM IBOC failures in Denver.
Logged
audioguy
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 357


« Reply #1 on: October 21, 2009, 08:54:37 PM »

Interesting post, Freebird! I wanted to read the newsletter myself, so I visited the web site but after several tries I gave up trying to download it. At 24 bytes per second it will take an awful long while.

I did notice one thing: on the Crawford Engineering page, it says "Crawford Broadcasting Company... is also on the leading edge of digital technology, being among the first in the nation to transmit High Definition (HD) Radio signals on some of its FM stations."

Apparently even Cris Alexander isn't aware that HD does not mean "High Definition". 
Logged
SUPERCASTER
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1739


« Reply #2 on: October 22, 2009, 01:32:16 PM »

I enjoyed reading the October issue of Crawford Broadcasting's engineering newsletter:

http://www.crawfordbroadcasting.com/~cbc/Local_Oscillator/October%202009%20Local%20Oscillator.pdf

CBC's western New York engineer Brian shares a candid but honest opinion; he has concluded that "public interest in HD-R is incapable of being revitalized."  Kudos to Cris Alexander for allowing this to be published, but according to the corporate interpretation, somehow Cris thinks the proximity of Buffalo and Rochester to Canada is to blame.  Yep, must be those socialists up north are out to sabotage HD Radio!

Meanwhile, other markets continue to have problems with their HD equipment.  Read about hard drive troubles with the "iBiquity Box" in the Chicago report and recent AM IBOC failures in Denver.


Thanks for the great article in the newsletter.

Since we are only allowed brief quotes here, my favorite lines were:

"Personally, I believe that public interest in
HD-R is incapable of being revitalized. The majority
of terrestrial radio listeners are now getting their local
radio “fix” from the Internet, either via
personal/desktop computers or iPhones."

I'd like to quote a few others but would probably get edited by the moderators.

What are your favorite quotes?
Logged

"HD RADIO- MAKES FM SOUND LIKE AM, AND AM SOUND LIKE CRAP!"
rbrucecarter5
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2157


« Reply #3 on: October 22, 2009, 02:31:48 PM »


I just wish that Crawford would shut off the IBOC on KAAM, so I could get a strong signal down here in Houston again.  This IBOCr@p really hobbles the analog coverage of every AM station that installs it.  Given the extremely low public interest in the flawed system, I would think it would a no brainer to turn if off for now, and if it ever does catch on with the public, then and only then turn it back on.

Logged
Savage
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1932


« Reply #4 on: October 23, 2009, 08:12:01 AM »

It's never going to "catch on."  The pop-count of HD-AM stations is within five stations of where it was in the fall of 2007, when I first started to keep track.  The only stations turning it on these days are AMs which committed two or three years ago to expensive rebuilds of directional systems to permit HD, such as WWVA, and these projects take a while.

We monitor CPSC-1 station WHAM locally for EAS.  On some nights WWVA's adjacent-channel IBOC noise, arriving via skywave makes reception of WHAM, 22 miles distant with 50kw, impossible.  These are co-owned stations.  It's mind-boggling.

At the very least the Commission should rescind the authorization for the use of HD at night.
Logged
Cal Stymes
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 451


« Reply #5 on: October 25, 2009, 04:32:50 PM »

Savage suggested:

Quote
We monitor CPSC-1 station WHAM locally for EAS.  On some nights WWVA's adjacent-channel IBOC noise, arriving via skywave makes reception of WHAM, 22 miles distant with 50kw, impossible.  These are co-owned stations.  It's mind-boggling.

It is worse than mind-boggling.  It is so very sad what these idiots have done to our beloved AM band that we can't hear locals anymore which are only 22 miles away and broadcasting with 50kw.
Logged
Savage
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1932


« Reply #6 on: October 26, 2009, 07:28:33 AM »

"HD honesty?"

Is that like: "plastic glasses?"  "Down escalator?"   "Military intelligence?"   Etc.....
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radio-Info.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radio-Info.com or its parent in3 media, inc. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radio-Info.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE. 12

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 1.781 seconds with 19 queries.