Radio-Info.com

Radio-Info.com Discussion Boards
Login November 21, 2009, 10:27:41 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Houston Sportstalkers--revenue weaklings?  (Read 2255 times)
War Of Attrition
Guest
« Reply #10 on: May 29, 2007, 12:06:10 PM »

The flipside is 790 to continue the format and op at a loss at just over a million is now a question.

Where do you get your information that 790 is loving $1M a year? I was under the impression it was making money, although not a lot.


How could they be loosing $1,000,000?  Clear Channel does not believe in stations that don't make money and you would have to work really hard to loose that much money with a decent signal and sales team like what CCH has with KBME. 
Logged
bayou_city_bob
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 208


« Reply #11 on: May 29, 2007, 01:47:51 PM »


I've heard that KTRH pulls about $2-$2.5 million per year off of the Astros and all related programming (Spring Training, Astroline, Local Pregame and 10th Inning shows).

Are you saying KTRH "clears" /profits 2.5M from Astro's or is that the total revenue. Because the former would be a great number, the later would be awful.
[/quote]

Total revenue brought in.....
Logged
Faraway
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 188


« Reply #12 on: May 29, 2007, 02:26:37 PM »

I agree with "War" - CC does not allow stations to lose $1M a year w/o someone getting in real big trouble. 

As for the Astros billing - if KTRH pays a right's fee, I'd be very surprised the figures quoted are accurate because I know of lesser teams bringing in more revenue.  If it's a barter deal, and the team is keeping most or all of the inventory, that'd be pretty good.
Logged
War Of Attrition
Guest
« Reply #13 on: May 29, 2007, 02:42:25 PM »

I agree with "War" - CC does not allow stations to lose $1M a year w/o someone getting in real big trouble. 

As for the Astros billing - if KTRH pays a right's fee, I'd be very surprised the figures quoted are accurate because I know of lesser teams bringing in more revenue.  If it's a barter deal, and the team is keeping most or all of the inventory, that'd be pretty good.

The KTRH and network feeds are not the same.  They are separate.  I am not sure if there are two feeds coming out of the box, or if KTRH feeds the network, but I am sure about KTRH not taking THE network feed.

This arrangement would imply that KTRH buys the local rights and the Astros get the network.  If this is the case then that revenue number is beyond embarrassing.
Logged
jasondm4
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 74


« Reply #14 on: June 06, 2007, 11:30:57 AM »

what was cumulus even thinking when they flipped 97.5 to sports? there wasting a perfectly good channel. There ratings have gotten even lower! I'm sure they will flip again
Logged
War Of Attrition
Guest
« Reply #15 on: June 06, 2007, 01:19:22 PM »

what was cumulus even thinking when they flipped 97.5 to sports? there wasting a perfectly good channel.

I am going to have to take issue with the "perfectly good channel" part.
Logged
jasondm4
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 74


« Reply #16 on: June 07, 2007, 03:40:38 PM »

sorry i didn't mean to put perfectly in there
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radio-Info.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radio-Info.com or its parent in3 media, inc. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radio-Info.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE. 14

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.727 seconds with 17 queries.