Radio-Info.com

Radio-Info.com Discussion Boards
Login March 19, 2010, 08:46:36 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: How is IBOC destroying AM DX?  (Read 1309 times)
louisNatl
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 134


« Reply #10 on: July 16, 2007, 10:11:45 PM »

So if I am understanding you correctly, there are methods that the broadcaster can take to reduce the sideband noise.  It makes sense that it can not be eliminated because it seems that there is bleedover on adjacent frequencies of a strong station regardless if they are broadcasting in HD.  I live about 10 miles from the blowtorch of WSB 750 AM here in Atlanta.  On some of my older radios and on my BA Receptor HD, I receive a bleedover of the WSB broadcast on 740 and 760 AM both day and night.  However, my Sangean RCR-2 alarm clock radio does not exhibit this behavior.  I can reliably receive a signal on 760 which broadcasts from Detriot and on certain nights I can receive a signal on 740 that I think originates from Houston but it's hard to make out as it fades often.  I will say that I have not heard any hiss or indication of a signal noise on the FM band adjacent frequencies on my Receptor.  I will admit that I may not know what to listen for but in all honesty, I do not hear anything different or unusual on those frequencies and I've also asked friends to listen as well.

I thought that the FCC allowed AM stations to broadcast IBOC 24-hours starting about a month ago.  I don't know if this will benefit the 50,000 watt clear channel stations that broadcast HD at night, but again I have not noticed a difference either way.

rbrucecarter, you mention KLIF.  According to Radio-Locator, they seem to have strong coverage especially in the daytime for just a 5,000 watt signal.  Does IBOC have anything to do with that?  If so, I can see IBOC as being more of a trade off.  The strong stations become stronger at the expense of weaker ones.

PocketRadio, those links that you provided actually provide a convincing case in favor of HD Radio, especially if you read the comments at the end.  It makes you consider the business side of it.  There is a surplus of AM radio stations, many of them unsuccessful.  The AM band in its present state may not be able to withstand new technology such as iPods, streaming radio, TV, and on demand content.

Also, the younger generation (Gen X) grew up listening to FM and the next generation (Generation Y) listens to CDs, iPods, and on demand content to fit their ADD personalities.  I am part of Generation Y (just barely since I was born in 1977), but I grew up listening to talk radio because I found it more stimulating and thought provoking than repetitive music.  I value the fact that my radio can receive numerous signals from all over the country at night when I usually listen.

However, as noted in the article (thanks to PocketRadio), advertisers do not care that the station's signal can be received up to 500 miles away thanks to tropo/skip conditions.  As long as the signal covers the market equivalent to an FM signal they don't care.  Besides, I can not really support a car dealer that I heard advertised on WHAS since I live in Atlanta.  Also, as much as I enjoy the novelty of DXing, it does not make a very big impact on the station.  The proof is that distant stations do not show up in the books in other markets.  The exception to this may be WWL in New Orleans which appears in the Jackson, MS and Gulf Coast books where it actually beat the local talk station in the Biloxi market.  I am sure this is partially due to the many displaced Katrina refugees in these regions though.  Honestly, these stations don't care about reaching distant locations as long as they are doing well and covering their local markets.

From a business perspective, this change may be inevitable in order for AM to gain listeners from younger generations.  However, stations should make sure that there signals do not damage reception of other stations.  

As an aside, did AM Stereo cause similar problems?  I am not very familiar with it but I remember hearing about it when I was a child.
Logged
louisNatl
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 134


« Reply #11 on: July 16, 2007, 10:13:50 PM »

IBOC is devistating to the AM band!!!

The other night some station around 910 left thier IBOC up all night and all i heard was hash mixed in with the stations (I couldnt make anything out)

Sad

I am curious to know what this sounds like since there are no IBOC AM stations in my area.  Can you get a recording or do you know if someone has posted one?
Logged
The Dude
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 5285


« Reply #12 on: July 16, 2007, 10:21:00 PM »

It sounds like noise covering the frequency,its disgusting!!!!!!

I dunno if someone can upload a clip for you to hear or not... (I dont have any)
Logged
DavidEduardo
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 17873

Pleasure in the job puts perfection in the work.


« Reply #13 on: July 16, 2007, 10:51:27 PM »

So if I am understanding you correctly, there are methods that the broadcaster can take to reduce the sideband noise.

Not really. The system behind HD puts energy in the sidebands, in a specific manner.


Quote
I thought that the FCC allowed AM stations to broadcast IBOC 24-hours starting about a month ago.  

The FCC approved, but the rules have not yet appeared in the Federal Register to make them official.

Quote
The strong stations become stronger at the expense of weaker ones.

IBOC does not change the signal strength one way or another for all practical purposes.

Quote
The AM band in its present state may not be able to withstand new technology such as iPods, streaming radio, TV, and on demand content.

AM is pretty dead already. Most of the listeners are over 45 or 50.

Quote
However, as noted in the article (thanks to PocketRadio), advertisers do not care that the station's signal can be received up to 500 miles away thanks to tropo/skip conditions.  As long as the signal covers the market equivalent to an FM signal they don't care.

That is because radio is bought by the market, using local stations. There is, and has not been since the late r40's, a model for buying distant markets via AM skip...  because nearly all radio listening and ad placement takes place in the daytime, not at night when there is nearly no listening to AM.

Quote
The proof is that distant stations do not show up in the books in other markets.  The exception to this may be WWL in New Orleans which appears in the Jackson, MS and Gulf Coast books where it actually beat the local talk station in the Biloxi market.

WWL does not appear in the Jackson book... it showed once during Katrina, and that is the only time I can find in the last 10 years. The local Biloxi FM talker, WBUV, kills WWL in the Biloxi-Gulfport-Pascagoula book. WWL appears in markets where there is a groundwave day signal, and gets very little out of market listening at night.


Quote
 I am sure this is partially due to the many displaced Katrina refugees in these regions though.

Refugees don't get Arbitron diaies. The listening in some distant markets that happend in the period when Katrina hit was done by local residents wanting direct storm reports.

Quote
As an aside, did AM Stereo cause similar problems?  I am not very familiar with it but I remember hearing about it when I was a child.

AM stereo was analog, and too little to late, thanks to leonard Kahn.
Logged

“Plans are only good intentions unless they immediately degenerate into hard work." Peter Drucker

www.americanradiohistory.com - Radio's Online Library
dx7
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 166


« Reply #14 on: July 17, 2007, 06:37:26 PM »

David Eduardo wrote:

"AM is pretty dead already. Most of the listeners are over 45 or 50."

My response:

So being over "45 or 50" is what killed AM radio? What a crock.

There are still TENS OF MILLIONS of radio listeners over "45 or 50", David, and you know what? A lot of them have lots of MONEY...and actually BUY THINGS with it.

The hometown AM I own sure doesn't seem dead to me OR my listeners. In fact, I don't give a rat's a_ _ that most of my listeners are over "45 or 50". We have a higher cume in our county than all the blowtorch big market FMs in the neighboring county have here. And we are making money.

The future? No one knows what the future will bring for AM OR FM. But once I'm gone, I bet someone else will figure out how to keep our little AM a part of the community.

I also have heard that, just in Texas alone, those "dead AMs" like KTRH, WBAP, WOAI, KLBJ-AM, KLVI and a lot more like them actually HAVE LISTENERS and are actually MAKING A LOT OF MONEY.

Please stop generalizing about AM radio being dead -- it may be dead in your hometown, but it's not dead everywhere. And stop assuming people who are "over 45 or 50" have one foot in the grave.
Logged
DavidEduardo
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 17873

Pleasure in the job puts perfection in the work.


« Reply #15 on: July 17, 2007, 08:25:14 PM »

So being over "45 or 50" is what killed AM radio? What a crock.

No, sounding like AM is what killed AM. As each 18 months goes by, the average age of AM listeners increases by a year in rated markets. At some point, such a big percentage will be out of the sales demos that those stations in agency driven markets will not be viable any longer. This is why, to cite some examples, Clear Channel has put traditional news / talk on FMs in markets like Charleston, SC, Biloxi, MS, Pittsburgh, New Orleans, Tallahassee, etc.... to get sales demos, specifically 35-54, on news / talk, the format has to migrate to FM. Once AMs main audience-getter finds an FM home in multiple markets... there will be even less audience on AM.

Quote
There are still TENS OF MILLIONS of radio listeners over "45 or 50", David, and you know what? A lot of them have lots of MONEY...and actually BUY THINGS with it.

That is not my point... my issue is that most AM listeners are over 55, unsalable in rated markets, and very few are under 45. In fact, AM listening overall is only 19% of the total listening for radio, and under 55, AM has less than a 10 share. And that is today,

Quote
The hometown AM I own sure doesn't seem dead to me OR my listeners. In fact, I don't give a rat's a_ _ that most of my listeners are over "45 or 50". We have a higher cume in our county than all the blowtorch big market FMs in the neighboring county have here. And we are making money.

Good. I hope you save some of it. The fact is that as time moves on, less and less listening is to AM because our younger two generations have not grown up with it, and the youngest of the two expects a quality AM can not give (unless HD is successful beyond everyone's wildest dreams)

Quote
I also have heard that, just in Texas alone, those "dead AMs" like KTRH, WBAP, WOAI, KLBJ-AM, KLVI and a lot more like them actually HAVE LISTENERS and are actually MAKING A LOT OF MONEY.


And every one of them except KLBJ has an audience that is growing older each year, and revenues that are stagnant or declining in markets that are growing. KLBJ is growing a tiny amount, mostly because the market has grown enormously in revenue... over 25% in just 6 years. Yet KLBJ is only up about 10% in the same period. 

Quote
Please stop generalizing about AM radio being dead -- it may be dead in your hometown, but it's not dead everywhere. And stop assuming people who are "over 45 or 50" have one foot in the grave.

I said "pretty much dead" and the exceptions are some smaller markets and the very few huge signal major market AMs. The rest are dead.

AM truly is dead or dying. That is why operators like Bonneville have moved WTOP to FM in DC, KTAR to FM in Phoenix and started simulcasting to move (like rent to own) its flagship KSL in Salt Lake.
« Last Edit: July 17, 2007, 08:36:41 PM by DavidEduardo » Logged

“Plans are only good intentions unless they immediately degenerate into hard work." Peter Drucker

www.americanradiohistory.com - Radio's Online Library
louisNatl
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 134


« Reply #16 on: July 17, 2007, 09:47:36 PM »

I understand David's points.  I do not know anyone anywhere near my age bracket that listens to AM.  Yes there are some AM stations that achieve high ratings and those are the big 50,000 watt signals in the big cities.  Even those stations serve an older audience than their FM counterparts.  Most younger people will not consider AM because of the inferior sound quality (compared to FM) and potential interference especially when driving.  Also, AM does not appeal to the growing segment of minorities because much of it is conservative talk radio.  However, talk radio has saved AM and gave it a second life.  As more talk and sports stations move to FM, who knows what could be the next savior of the AM band...IBOC, maybe?  And, as the AM listening audience continues to age, listening on AM will continue to decline and more stations will become less significant and some will go dark.

Here are some examples.  Here in Atlanta, WSB consistently earns the highest ratings in the market.  However there are several small AM stations that are leased for religious and ethnic programming and some have gone silent.  Just read through the borads on this site and you will find similar situations with the AM band in other markets as well.  Also, WWL in New Orleans decided to simulcast their signal on FM due to the positive feedback that they received after Katrina.  Despite the fact that Entercom attempted to bring in a classic hits format, the listeners wanted a simulcast of a station that they could easily receive on 870 AM.  Entercom has stated that it is gained new listeners with the signal. 

I enjoy AM too, but to say that AM is not declining, you would have to be in serious denial.  Show me one market where the majority of top rated stations are AM.
Logged
mimo
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 822

Ottawa Canada


« Reply #17 on: July 18, 2007, 01:42:17 AM »

I am 31 years old...I grew up with AM in Canada...as did most people my age.  I have many friends who are under 30 who said IF a station on AM offered what they want to hear and an FM station offered the same programming, they'd listen to both stations, regardless of band, as long as it is what they wanted to hear.  Many people under 45 would IF they were given the choice and the station was well programmed.  I know teenagers who listen to out of market AM stations just to hear something that's not available locally.  Example, coast to coast am..nearest affiliate is 2 hours away.  AM isn't what it was, but it will always attract new listeners, some out of curiosity, others will grow out of FM, If I could hear an Alternative rocker on AM, I'd listen, along with the local alternative FM.  I'm annoyed when people say there is no future for AM, it will always find a way to re-invent itself...it's always done so, from the 1950's to the present time.  Even with the so called "noise level" I find much more interferes or hurts an FM signal than AM, I talked to a friend of mine over the french news talk AM moving to FM here, the new FM signal doesn't cover the metro area, it starts dropping out once you get 5 miles from downtown, and is gone when you drive 15 minutes out of town, All I know is there are going to be a TON of french hockey fans here in Ottawa who are going to be VERY upset when they find they won't be able to hear their games after they switch off the AM transmitter this fall. 
Logged
PocketRadio
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 873


« Reply #18 on: July 18, 2007, 05:32:32 AM »

Also, WWL in New Orleans decided to simulcast their signal on FM due to the positive feedback that they received after Katrina. 

KSL SLC tried simulcasting on FM, but eventually the ratings fell back to where there were, before - the problerm is that broadcast radio is in a decline, due to Satellite Radio, cell phones, iPods, gaming-systems, the Internet, etc., so nothing is going to save broadcast radio. AM-HD will just hasten the destruction of the AM band, because of adjacent-channel interference and consumers do not care about sound quality for news/talk/sports. Looks like HD is DOA, anyway.
Logged
PocketRadio
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 873


« Reply #19 on: July 18, 2007, 05:40:19 AM »

I am 31 years old...I grew up with AM in Canada...as did most people my age.  I have many friends who are under 30 who said IF a station on AM offered what they want to hear and an FM station offered the same programming, they'd listen to both stations, regardless of band, as long as it is what they wanted to hear.  Many people under 45 would IF they were given the choice and the station was well programmed.  I know teenagers who listen to out of market AM stations just to hear something that's not available locally.  Example, coast to coast am..nearest affiliate is 2 hours away.  AM isn't what it was, but it will always attract new listeners, some out of curiosity, others will grow out of FM, If I could hear an Alternative rocker on AM, I'd listen, along with the local alternative FM.  I'm annoyed when people say there is no future for AM, it will always find a way to re-invent itself...it's always done so, from the 1950's to the present time.  Even with the so called "noise level" I find much more interferes or hurts an FM signal than AM, I talked to a friend of mine over the french news talk AM moving to FM here, the new FM signal doesn't cover the metro area, it starts dropping out once you get 5 miles from downtown, and is gone when you drive 15 minutes out of town, All I know is there are going to be a TON of french hockey fans here in Ottawa who are going to be VERY upset when they find they won't be able to hear their games after they switch off the AM transmitter this fall. 

I am not going to worry about the 50KW AMs going dark anytime soon - this is just a sampling of 50KW AM stations either ranked #1, or in the top-5 (there are plenty others):

WHO-AM  News Talk Information 9.7 7.2 9.9 10.6
WLW-AM  News Talk Information 8.9 9.9 11.2 9.8
WSB-AM  News Talk Information 9.3 8.7 9.2 8.2
WGN-AM  News Talk Information 5.3 5.5 5.8 5.4
WBBM-AM  All News 4.2 4.1 4.4 4.6
WLS-AM  News Talk Information 4.1 3.7 3.7 3.8
WTAM-AM  News Talk Information 7.3 8.0 6.5 7.3
WJR-AM  News Talk Information 4.8 4.9 5.3 5.3
KMOX-AM  News Talk Information 8.4 7.7 8.2 8.4
KSL-AM  News Talk Information 5.9 6.7 8.6 7.7

http://www.arbitron.com/radio_stations/home.htm

The real problem is that AM-HD is in effect turning AMs into local FMs.  HD/IBOC will be the destuction of the broadcast bands, especiially AM.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radio-Info.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radio-Info.com or its parent in3 media, inc. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radio-Info.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE. 13

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 1.149 seconds with 18 queries.