Radio-Info.com

Radio-Info.com Discussion Boards
Login March 19, 2010, 04:11:04 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 92.1/100.1  (Read 1103 times)
NEPA_radiobored
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 93


« Reply #10 on: August 25, 2007, 10:43:25 AM »


  Wow .. When Did He Leave Route 81?  Last I knew He Was Running WCDL

Was running CDL, then moved over to Lite 94.3, then must have realized the Route 81 is going nowhere and ...over to the "Q".  As a matter of fact, I was waiting in the car for my wife last Saturday or Sunday (memory is shot) and heard him pulling a shift.  (VT'ed but he is one of the few that can make you think he was "in studio")
Logged
NEPA_radiobored
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 93


« Reply #11 on: August 25, 2007, 10:55:22 AM »

the Mountain (which according to ratings, is in its death throes and may not be around much longer) and WHLM-FM. Come on guys, surprise us now and again.

I really think the Mountain is good but just as Q102 could not "take the candy from the baby" with KRZ, the mountain has the same problem.  SIGNAL!  102.3 has been plagued with one of the worst signals in the area.  All of the translators in the valley have better coverage over 102.  The Mountain is a great alternative to Rock 107 but it just doesn't have the signal. They should have moved to Mountain over to 103.1 with a much better signal, but that was turned over to WILK.  As was supposed to be done years ago.  Years ago, back in the WISH days, 102 was supposed to become WILK-FM.  This move would have appeased the crowd that complain they can't get the AM in the office.   Roll Eyes 
Logged
crmc
Guest
« Reply #12 on: August 25, 2007, 09:53:06 PM »

Q-102 was 6th 12+ in it's heyday, and 3rd 18-34 behind WKRZ and WEZX.For a few years it had a nice run. It never was designed to beat WKRZ, it wouldn't be technically possible.While it's not the best "Class A" signal in the market, it's not the worst. Arguably it's the 4th best Class A signal in terms of population served with city grade signal. WEZX, WBHT and WQFM would be the best three technical facilities IMHO.
 It's worth noting and  admirable that WEZX/WPZX remains at the top ( currently # 1 or 2 in 25-54 adults, isn't it?) with two 6kw  Class A stations simulcasting. It's got to be one of the most successful Class A stations in the top 100 markets.
Can you list any more successful? (Perhaps WWIN in Baltimore?)
Logged
carlvenorden
Guest
« Reply #13 on: August 27, 2007, 07:53:33 AM »

I think I can say this now without divulging information most of you don't know.
Ed Histed left Rt 81 about a month ago.  I believe he saw changes coming that he didn't like, but that is my opinion only.
He formed his own radio consulting firm and his first job was consulting WQFM from the Scranton Times Building. No doubt "the Q" moniker was Ed's and I know Ed.

There will be change at Q.  Not tomorrow. But soon.

I worked for Ed when he owned WDNH in Honesdale.  Even in 1990, WDNH was amongst the very first local stations to use computer automation.  Ed taught all of us how to voice track, and he is still amongst the very best voicetracker.  He really DOES sound like he is live, you really can not tell if he is there or not.  And that is a fact:  I once called Ed at WCDL convinced he was there, and it was early: but he emailed me back saying he needed to step out for an early meeting.

Inasmuch as in that year, computers inside businesses were just coming to fruitation, WDNH had a very ingenious automation system, that really allowed you to do anything you can do now, just not as smoothly.  It was a pioneering system.
Now, everything is on hard disc, but this automation system was hooked up to a bank of (IIRC) about 30 CD decks that each held 5 CD's.  These were in another room across from the studio.
When Ed or Pete wanted to change songs in the CD players they would just delete the song from the computer and add in a new title (this is what we saw in the studio).  Interestingly, everyweek we did the Weekly TOP 40 program, and part of my job was to time this out on a CD deck that had a very accurate timer.  I wrote every time break down on paper and Ed would go in and program it into a log.  Therefore, if a commercial break ran over or under 2 seconds, it was MY fault!  Smiley  It was a simple matter of just putting the cd's into the proper player and when it was time for the show, it fired off automatically.

In 1996, it was becoming the end of the analog era.  The DJ's could record shows 2 days in advance onto the computer if they wanted the weekend off.  However that automation system was restricted to two days out.  IF there was a holicay weekend (like Labor Day) that someone wanted the day off, he recorded his liners onto a reel, and I dumped that audio into the computer on Sunday night.  We did get agency spots on reel that I dumped into automation, but other than that we didn't use much analog even at that time.

So, for the person wondering if the QFM website will change....I would imagine YES.  Ed did all the Route 81 sites, and he also owns his own computer programming company.  Write him at edhisted.com.
Carl
Logged
carlvenorden
Guest
« Reply #14 on: August 27, 2007, 11:35:13 AM »

I heard from Ed Histed this morning.  (Do PD's read these boards?.......yes they do).
Ed is now the PD at WQFM.
Expect change.
Thanks for the nice letter ED!
Carl
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radio-Info.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radio-Info.com or its parent in3 media, inc. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radio-Info.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE. 14

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.755 seconds with 20 queries.