Radio-Info.com

Radio-Info.com Discussion Boards
Login November 21, 2009, 01:05:00 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: K-LOVE in Plymouth IN files for a site change and increased coverage  (Read 711 times)
justalurker
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 433

Just a lurking (and a posting)


« on: August 27, 2007, 10:41:09 PM »

Educational Media's 98.3 FM in Plymouth filed for a site change and huge increase in coverage that will bring it's signal to the edge of South Bend and Elkhart Indiana.

They are moving from 400w at 76m to a directional 44kw at 81m

Before: http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/FMTV-service-area?x=FM1079819.html
After: http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/FMTV-service-area?x=FM1197476.html

The application was filed July 30th ... a lot of non-comms are trying to beat the freeze before the October filing window.

WIKV is operating under a main studio waiver that allows them to operate as a repeater of KLVR, Santa Rosa, CA. Must be nice having a 44kw translator.
« Last Edit: August 27, 2007, 10:43:06 PM by justalurker » Logged
radiomaps
Radio Data Services
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 18

FM radio station mapping services, including FCC model and Longley-Rice maps for FM and LPFM stations including non-commerical FM spacing studies. Population and demographic analyses.Occupation:FM mapping and studies/searches


« Reply #1 on: August 27, 2007, 11:57:40 PM »

If it's 98.3 MHz, it's not affected by the September 8th "freeze." It's not even an I.F. frequency of the reserved band.  http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-3521A1.pdf
Logged

Radio Data Services
www.radiodataservices.com
radiodataservices@radiodataservices.com
FM radio maps, FCC upgrade studies, demographics
justalurker
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 433

Just a lurking (and a posting)


« Reply #2 on: August 28, 2007, 05:15:23 PM »

My typo ... channel 207 89.3
Logged
Johnathan
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1015


« Reply #3 on: August 29, 2007, 10:09:38 PM »

FWIW they are also doing it with K-LOVE's other Northern Indiana outlet, WQKV 88.5.

The current 88.5 coverage map (250 watts at 52 feet HAAT):
http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/FMTV-service-area?x=FM1143566.html

The proposed change to 88.7 and boost to 25kw at 90 feet HAAT:
http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/FMTV-service-area?x=FM1198621.html

I'm guessing this would also knock off translator W204BC 88.7 Warsaw, which repeats WPCS, Pensacola, FL (the Rejoice Radio network). But from the looks of it, they could move to another channel. IIRC, satellite-delivered translators can move out of the reserved band if they are displaced by a full power FM.

I'm just disappointed that translator W241AT 96.1 Kokomo, which was supposedly going to deliver WFBQ loud and clear, will instead be yet another outlet for WFRN's "Family Friendly" programming. It's been bought by their nonprofit partner "Friends of Christian Radio." If they really want to impress me, they'd find a way to repeat WIWU-LP or WTGO-LP, offering something that would at least keep me awake. I'd even take K-Love over WFRN, as they at least offer nonstop music.

It's a difficult situation though, because as a non-reserved band TX, it must receive programming via terrestrial means. Of course, they could buy an ISDN line, which is what WFIU does for their 106.1 TX in the City of Firsts.
Logged
justalurker
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 433

Just a lurking (and a posting)


« Reply #4 on: August 30, 2007, 12:12:41 AM »

With Clear Channel's sell off I doubt if they would bother building the Kokomo translator. It's probably a break even situation if not a loss for them. If they are not going to use it it might as well be built by someone who will use it.

Unless there is some sort of waiver, non-reserved band FX stations MUST receive their signals OTA. The only exception is if they are within the protected contour of the station they are translating. WIWC's protected contour cuts through the middle of Kokomo. Which means (in the non-reserved band) that any use of W241AT must be OTA and must be owned by someone other than Moody Broadcasting. It could translate WGNR if receiving that station is a problem in Kokomo. (Not really a need to translate WIWC with WGNR there.)

If WTGO-LP's OTA signal is reaching Kokomo there is a serious engineering problem. Again, it's a non-reserved channel so it has to be OTA.

The license for W291AM 106.1 FX Kokomo (granted March 7th, 2000) authorizes reception of WFIU "over the air" not by any other means.
« Last Edit: August 30, 2007, 12:17:36 AM by justalurker » Logged
Johnathan
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1015


« Reply #5 on: August 31, 2007, 04:16:42 AM »

With Clear Channel's sell off I doubt if they would bother building the Kokomo translator. It's probably a break even situation if not a loss for them. If they are not going to use it it might as well be built by someone who will use it.

If WTGO-LP's OTA signal is reaching Kokomo there is a serious engineering problem. Again, it's a non-reserved channel so it has to be OTA.

The license for W291AM 106.1 FX Kokomo (granted March 7th, 2000) authorizes reception of WFIU "over the air" not by any other means.

You have a point. I hadn't considered the Clear Channel selloff as a factor.

And, admittedly, it's wishful thinking that WTGO could be received over the air here in Kokomo.

However - I have read what the license says, but I know I have also read in different sources through the years that W291AM was not fed over the air. Really, how could it be? Even good car radios can't receive anything south of Indianapolis up here.

I found one page, a "History" document written on behalf of WFIU, that states the following:
Quote
Funded by a grant from the Public Telecommunications Facilities Program Fund, WFIU installed a translator broadcasting at 106.1 FM from the main building on the Indiana University-Kokomo campus, reaching Kokomo via a fiber optic audio data circuit.
http://www.indiana.edu/~wfiu/50history-hargiswilliams.htm

I guess it technically may not be an ISDN line; I could speculate that it may in fact be provided through the IU network itself, or perhaps the statewide IHETS.org network. I can confirm (because I have heard it with my own ears) that there was at least one occasion where the "fiber optic audio data circuit" went down, and they decided to just plug in a PC and play the online stream of WFIU instead. Or at least that's what it sounded like, because it was very low fidelity, had very little (if any) stereo separation, and had that usual "compressed" sound that some internet stations do.
Logged
BSURadioGeek
WCRD Alumni
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 168

Never in radio... except for my dreams.


« Reply #6 on: August 31, 2007, 02:21:12 PM »

I was in Plymouth last weekend and I noticed 89.3.  With Pulse FM, the area has a really good representation of Christian music.  But will it be able to sustain it?
Logged

Top 10 best things about having a building named for you.

"#6, when someone says that Letterman is cold and empty, they may be talking about the building."
Johnathan
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1015


« Reply #7 on: September 01, 2007, 02:21:16 PM »

It's a good question. But they do have quite a variety of commercial (WFRN, Pulse FM) and noncommercial (K-Love, Radio X (WCVM 94.7)) options now.

I think K-Love might do well, as they are non-com, they never stop the music to play talk or preaching, and if they can get the signal upgrades, heck, they will end up with a (distant) rimshot into the South Bend area.

However, I can also see that the area could suffer from over-saturation with the Christian AC format. Then again, WFRN's Soft AC / Inspo has coexisted with Pulse FM's slightly hotter AC format over many years.

I would guess that if K-Love doesn't get the support numbers they want, EMF might do well to try their Adult CHR Air1 format on either or both stations.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radio-Info.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radio-Info.com or its parent in3 media, inc. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radio-Info.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE. 12

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 1.392 seconds with 20 queries.