...And like your friend up the Boulevard [Mr. Burns], you appear to have a problem remembering what was stated in a prior post:
Quote from: hipporadio on October 06, 2007, 06:39:34 am
I’m basing this on second-hand news; as I have not so much as touched the RS Accurian or HD-100 with “my formerly nicotine-stained fingers”...
That last quote leads me to believe that you may have the same relationship with truth that the porcine individual who coined it.
Since you may have so internalized it, I'll refresh your memory, it's the same person who is still accusing the Clintons of murdering Vince Foster.
a followup conversation in mid December, they thought 2 might have been.
-And that of recollection is about as authoritative as yours with an important exception: Note "may have been" vs. "was". As in "
What I CAN recall is the dismal statistic that the Accurian was the MOST-RETURNED"
WHERE in Webster’s definition of “recall” is an association with misinformation or dishonesty implied?
Now, now it's all in the context, isn't it.
This is a radio FORUM—NOT the official public record. Speculation and second-person attributions are part of ANY business [YOURS ESPECIALLY!]...
Finally something I agree with, and since I work the stocks, speculations is a part of my business. See, like I allways say, "even a broken clock is right twice a day". Except ofcourse if it's digital.
Now, let’s get back to comparing RADIOS – rather than verbs from a thesaurus
Excellent idea. Let's also try to delineate fact from belief -this isn't a discussion of religion.
Lino