Radio-Info.com

Radio-Info.com Discussion Boards
Login November 21, 2009, 02:55:09 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: KGO Changes?  (Read 2213 times)
DavidKaye
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 986

Okay, you got me. I wasn't going to be here, but


« on: November 12, 2007, 08:58:11 PM »

Citadel reports the result of their first quarter as owner of the ABC stations of a 7% drop in revenue.  Several markets are mentioned, among them San Francisco. 

I'm wondering if this means Cit will have a more hands-on approach to KGO (and thus screw it all up), or whether they'll decide to sell the station to Mickey Luckoff, Jack Swanson, et al. 

While I disagree with KGO's insistence on blowing off the under-50 crowd, still I can't fault them for an otherwise excellent presentation, stable of talent, and listenability.  I surely hope Citadel doesn't kill their golden goose.

Logged
Production Boy
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 247

Occupation:Broadcaster


« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2007, 08:59:41 PM »

Well, I read Inside Radio on 11/12. I did not see SF mentioned. They were reporting on Farid Suleman and his comments about ABC. Chicago, Atlanta, Dallas were 3 of the 4 that were mentioned, but not SF. Trust me, the problem is not in SF. It is their Golden Goose ! But revenue is down all over. Not just at Citadel, and not just at ABC.

The ABC Stations cannot be sold for at least 2 more years. That was part of the Disney/Citadel Deal.
Big Tax hit for both companies if they sell before then. It was a very complicated deal.

KGO is #3 25-54 in the last book. "Insistance on Blowing off the under 50 crowd?" No one is doing that David. But,thanks for not faulting the presentation, stable of talent and listenability. It's worked very well for the last 29 years. I'm sure that's what Farid thinks too.

The ABC Stations are held in a seperate group/division of the company. The Citadel stations (Pre ABC) are in a seperate group too. As is the ABC radio Network.
Logged
coppersmom
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 92


« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2007, 07:49:38 PM »

from what I understand the mighty KGO was the only citadel buy in the ABC bunch that is holding its own....thanks to Mickey, Jack, et. al.and the unique nature of the Bay Area.
Logged
DavidKaye
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 986

Okay, you got me. I wasn't going to be here, but


« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2007, 10:22:04 PM »

Well, I read Inside Radio on 11/12. I did not see SF mentioned. They were reporting on Farid Suleman and his comments about ABC. Chicago, Atlanta, Dallas were 3 of the 4 that were mentioned, but not SF. Trust me, the problem is not in SF. It is their Golden Goose ! But revenue is down all over. Not just at Citadel, and not just at ABC.

I got this from the Citadel conference call on November 9:  According to Robert Freedline, CFO, "Revenues decreased by $9 million, or 3.6% as a result of a $10.2 million decline in revenue of our Radio Markets, offset in part by an increasing revenue at the Radio Network of $1.5 million. The decline in net revenues at the Radio Markets was primarily attributable to lower revenues in our Atlanta, Birmingham, Washington D.C., San Francisco, Detroit, Dallas, Providence and Tucson radio stations." 

Sorry about that. 

Quote
KGO is #3 25-54 in the last book. "Insistance on Blowing off the under 50 crowd?" No one is doing that David. But,thanks for not faulting the presentation, stable of talent and listenability. It's worked very well for the last 29 years. I'm sure that's what Farid thinks too.

Oh, you're top-notch; always have been.  (Would you believe I have kicking around here somewhere a piece of tape with some promos you did back in the KCSM days?  Someday I'll find the damned thing.) 

But I contend that there is a lot being done to make KGO unappealing to anyone under 50.  For instance, the events promoted by KGO tend to the senior crowd -- the endless wine tastings and Sausalito art shows, Taj Mahal at Yoshi's, the Andrea Bocelli concert, etc.  And it seems that the only promotion KGO runs that appeals to the under-50 crowd has just been cancelled: the Bay to Breakers race. 

And the advertisers are almost all for the 50+ crowd -- what, 5 mattress companies, window, plumbing, carpet, and other home remodeling companies.  I was talking the other day with an account exec from Fisher Investments (the "high net worth" people).  She said that KGO was remarkably good at bringing in accounts in the 60+ age group.  That's great for her company because this is their target demo. 

I happen to socialize largely with people in the 25-45 age group, and really, there's nothing there in the promo or ad departments that appeals to that crowd.  I hear little crossover in advertisers between KLLC and KGO, for instance. 

Understand that I have nothing against people in the 50+ age range -- we should all get there some day.  But, the longterm survival of KGO depends on reaching younger population groups as well.  That's all I'm saying.

Oh, and I'm saying one more thing:  Aside from the occasional listen, I find little of interest on KGO these days.  I don't want to listen to Iraq-talk, wine or restaurant talk, World War II and Eisenhower, or even Richard Nixon for that matter, or the endless rehashing of "issues of the day" by callers who aren't expert in anything but calling in every three days and spouting vacuous comments. 

I do listen from time to time, yes, because radio is in my blood and probably always will be. 
Logged
oaktree
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1342


« Reply #4 on: November 14, 2007, 11:47:31 PM »

I am, to say the least, stunned by David's response.  It seems a bit subjective to me and not objective, in that Mike's quote of KGO being #3 25-54 didn't quite sit well with David.

As one who listens to KGO a lot, as well as other talk radio stations, (as well  as one involved for the last few years in the genre,) some questions and observations:

First, who thinks that talk radio in the 25-54 demo is growing, anyway?  Especially at the rate it did, say, 10-15 years ago when there was a "newness" to the Limbaugh, Hannity, Liddy, Savage, Art Bell "legacy" of hard-hitting right wing radio.  My feeling is that there is a decided "flatness," if not decline to the "national talkers" over the last two or three years, if not erosion that is getting faster quarter-to-quarter.  The content is not sharp, is very repetitious and, now, apologetic in tone with excuses for the right side in response to the left, liberal side.  I'm hearing more right-wing "whining" now than ever.

As for "liberal talk," Air America then and now in its latest reincarnation has proven to be far less than stellar in the performance arena.

With the glut of talk radio on so many frequencies ... all readily heard on more than location on most "local" radio dials today, sometimes within 20-30 miles ... how long is this "trend" going to continue.  I find audiences feeling that national talk is stagnating.

I don't see Limbaugh, Hannity, Levin, Savage, Ingraham, Schlesinger, Noorey, Elder, O'Reilly, Colmes, Larson, Bohannon, King, Humphries, Edell, Reynolds, Browne or the second and third tier personalities growing audience ... but merely shifting from show-to-show. 

Back to KGO.  First, the station, unlike its sister station, KSFO, is live, local and diverse.  Yes, KGO has its conservative/moderate bent with the legendary Ronn Owens, who owns the talk market in the Bay Area, no matter the demo ... and I know strongly in the 25-54 year old demo ... not much higher than 30-35 on average, but certainly lower than the older 50 demo.

Then there's attorney Len Tillum, fun for awhile, but not in a great place for his "I am a lawya" talk.  He is best on the weekends.  45 minutes is an injustice to him ... and the audience is decidedly older.

Dr. Dean Edell. Now you're hitting the 50+ demo. To old for the station, but a legendary voice in the Bay Area. I don't find him appealing, but it's the "legacy" factor.  I do think Mr. Swanson could re-tool the noon to two segment.

No one can replace the late Pete Wilson.  Pete was no Ronn Owens, but did well in the 35+ demo and probably better on the 45+ demo.  His replacement, Gil Gross, is a decent effort by KGO to represent hip, cool and yet, still refined and defined talk for the 35+ audience ... right in the lower middle of the 25-54 year sweet spot. Not a bad move.  Entertaining and informative.

The 4 to 7 p.m. news block is bland on KGO.  Talk is king on Newstalk/810 and in  my opinion, the demo strength is lost as the audience age goes up with this block.  But, the best traffic coverage in the area and that booming signal, makes news an important priority for all prime demos, in my opinion.  Maybe just not as long in the TSL figures as it could be ... except in the 50+ demo.  The afternoon news isn't hip.  It's flows like a glacier, in my opinion.  It's there to fill in the spots between weather and traffic. I am one who still tolerates Lloyd Lindsey Young's weather casts, remembering him from his New York days on WWOR before moving west.

Gene Burns is a Libertarian.  Nothing wrong with that.  In fact, I think Gene Burns is the best talk show host on KGO. Perfect for nights and probably a 45+ audience ... but active and interesting to listen to most all the time. But who's listening to radio at night in talk radio at those "prime time" hours? 

Bernie Ward.  Noted "lion of the left." Liberal who does quite well and I bet does quite well with the "surviving" 30+ audience that recycles from Burns to Bernie ... but the demo goes up from there...way up.

Ray Talifiero.  Hard to be objective here for me.  I can't stand the show, or the man's ultra-left stance, presentation or take on events.  His audience tips the scales, I'd imagine, to 65+ or, at least, most anyone over 50 at best all-night. 

The KGO morning news - again, "must hear radio" in the morning, though Ed Baxter has probably outlived his many year stay by now. But the cast moves, is frequently humorous and the traffic and weather can't be beat. Again, demos from 25 up, if not a majority in the 35 plus category ... the low mid side of the 25-54 demo.

John Rothman should be on full time ... but where? I'd opt for 4-7.  I think he'd be great there ... but he probably would skew older because of his all-night weekend audience.  But then again, maybe not.  I think he'd do well with a 30+ demo on KGO.

The imaging of the station with promos is first rate.  I just can't spend $80 for a CD of the many promos run, but they're great. Production, too.  But the imaging of Lonnie Perkins is first class and first rate.  Strong, articulate and passionate.

Jingles are horrible. Especially the solo acapellas. Logo wise, they're ok ... but the sound is grating sameness. Too much brass, not enough vocal mix and, well, not very "hip." (But they try to be.)

I think KGO is stuck in the middle ... the low middle sweet spot of the 25-54s, but as is the case with long-time talk stations (especially number one KGO after 29 years of being number one all the time,) it would not be hard to see the audience getting older and older each month.

Wonder what KGO would do on FM...  I bet it could fly and with decent demos...because KGO is the voice of San Francisco. But it's audience is getting older where it is. And that signal ... you can't beat it.  Leave KGO where it is.  It still has a future ... but it looks like it will be an older future year by year from now on.
Logged

"Thanks for taking my call..."
airpab
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 272


« Reply #5 on: November 15, 2007, 01:44:03 AM »

Is it me or does Ronn Owens come across as kind of self-important, smug and condescending?  And his cutesy little quips... are they really that cutesy? At least he thinks so.  He's got to be one of the most over-rated radio personalities on the planet?  Right place at the right time long ago and timing is everything, especially in radio. 

As for KGO overall, they've got a monster signal and that always helps in the ratings, especially on the AM side.  And they've got some interesting personalities and a very decent (albeit heavily produced) overall presentation, although way too many commercials.

If KSFO had a better line-up, better dial position and a half-way decent signal, they'd pose some competition to KGO.  But KGO sits in a pretty enviable spot in SF radio and they have taken full advantage of that.....gotta give at least that to them!

Logged
oaktree
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1342


« Reply #6 on: November 15, 2007, 10:05:47 AM »

I think they earned it ... and taking a look at what's happened in other markets, longevity isn't the hallmark of success. Ronn Owens may not be everyone's cup of tea, but he's huge after all this time.  I don't think it was merely handed to him in a competitive market like SF.
Logged

"Thanks for taking my call..."
Lkeller
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3085


« Reply #7 on: November 15, 2007, 01:17:50 PM »

"First, who thinks that talk radio in the 25-54 demo is growing, anyway?  Especially at the rate it did, say, 10-15 years ago when there was a "newness" to the Limbaugh, Hannity, Liddy, Savage, Art Bell "legacy" of hard-hitting right wing radio.  My feeling is that there is a decided "flatness," if not decline to the "national talkers" over the last two or three years, if not erosion that is getting faster quarter-to-quarter.  The content is not sharp, is very repetitious and, now, apologetic in tone with excuses for the right side in response to the left, liberal side.  I'm hearing more right-wing "whining" now than ever."

I agree.  Though there have always been conservative talk radio hosts, and a few of the "stars" like Limbaugh became big as far back as the 80s, I think right-wing talk really hit its stride during the Clinton presidency.  Old Bubba was the fuel that stoked their fires, and he was generally subject number 1. It seemed like there was no Clinton subject too trivial for them to be outraged about. 

I remember Jim Eason taking most of an hour to discuss Clinton's hair color.  It was Eason's contention that Bill changed his hair color from brown to gray and back again frequently - and this, of course, showed a lack of moral character. At the time, Clinton was just starting to turn gray, and Eason never considered the possiblity that his Bill's hair might look different depending on the lighting.

After 8 years of conservative Republican rule in the White House and Congress, the tide has turned and the right wing hosts are either on the defensive (yes - often whining).  They also must be pretty disillusioned with the level of corruption that existed in the Republican Congress.

I'd bet that right-wing talk ratings will improve considerably if Hillary is elected President...or any Democrat for that matter.
Logged
Gale Tulare
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 31


« Reply #8 on: November 15, 2007, 01:54:31 PM »

Yes indeed, thanks David for not having anything against us 50+ folks!  I would imagine that KGO does many things very well, not the least of which is its ability to sell to its available audience.  And as Production Boy mentioned they've been doing it for a long time.
Statistically, the under 50 crowd is spending less and less time with radio.  There are simply too many alternatives.  The only place it's growing is 50+.  That's where KGO lives.
Somebody on one blog or another quotes Wayne Gretzky:

"I skate where the puck will be, not where it has been."
Logged
DavidKaye
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 986

Okay, you got me. I wasn't going to be here, but


« Reply #9 on: November 15, 2007, 02:46:39 PM »

I am, to say the least, stunned by David's response.  It seems a bit subjective to me and not objective, in that Mike's quote of KGO being #3 25-54 didn't quite sit well with David.

I think that if KGO is really #3 in 25 to 54 then the ad agencies wouldn't be avoiding KGO like the plague.  They'd be jumping on them.  National accounts usually buy 3 deep in desired demos.  This conflicts with what I've heard on the air.  KGO doesn't appear to get many national accounts.  Maybe Shane Company is national and was shopped by an agency, but the national ads I hear on KGO off-network appear mainly to be network make-goods. 

But, for my own listening, there's little on the radio I want to listen to at all.  I like Len Tillem, Dean Edell, and Gil Gross.  That's about it.  That's just 4 hours out of 24.  I would like to have that compelling interest in listening more, but most KGO talkshows bore me.

There is what I call a "driveway listen", which is someone who is so compelling that I can't turn off the radio even after I've pulled into the driveway.  Len Tillem and Dean Edell are driveway listens for me.  That's pretty good.  But the rest of the hosts?  Not really. 

Quote
As one who listens to KGO a lot, as well as other talk radio stations, (as well  as one involved for the last few years in the genre,) some questions and observations:

How old are you? 

Quote
As for "liberal talk," Air America then and now in its latest reincarnation has proven to be far less than stellar in the performance arena.

Except in desirable demographics in some cities.  The people I know who listen to talkradio who are under age 50 are listening to Air America or NPR. 

Quote
John Rothman should be on full time ... but where? I'd opt for 4-7.  I think he'd be great there ... but he probably would skew older because of his all-night weekend audience.  But then again, maybe not.  I think he'd do well with a 30+ demo on KGO.

I had hopes for John Rothmann, but he's forever talking about World War II, Dwight Eisenhower, and Richard Nixon.  Clue: Richard Nixon left office before 1/3 of America was born.  Nobody under 35 remembers Richard Nixon. 

Quote
Jingles are horrible. Especially the solo acapellas. Logo wise, they're ok ... but the sound is grating sameness. Too much brass, not enough vocal mix and, well, not very "hip." (But they try to be.)

The best jingles KGO ever had were the original ones when they first went to talk.  "KGO....one of the good things about San Francisco."  It was rich and classy.  It also speaks to an era when SF was a center for nightclubs, when in any given night one could go to North Beach and see Barbra Streisand, the Smothers Brothers, and Woody Allen.  Even so, the jingles were great. 

Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radio-Info.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radio-Info.com or its parent in3 media, inc. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radio-Info.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE. 12

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 1.448 seconds with 21 queries.