Eli Polonsky
rimember
Offline
Posts: 3276
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: January 09, 2008, 12:14:57 PM » |
|
For what it's worth, the 93.7 and 99.5 coverage of the downtown Boston area and immediate metro may look similar on paper, but in actual listening experience, 93.7 has significantly better penetration of the city than 99.5. Perhaps it's just one more hill in the way from Peabody to Andover or something related to the terrain, but there's a significant difference.
Here in Somerville just a few miles north of Boston, 93.7 comes in with local reception behavior and does a much better job of cutting right through the intermod slop from the Pru. It comes in OK and in stereo on cheap, poor quality tuners such as Walkman's, boom-boxes and clock radios, which can barely even hear 99.5 here, if at all.
93.7 immediately activates the HD on my Sangean home tuner without having to fool with my indoor antenna positioning. 99.5 is very difficult to get here in HD, and doing so requires some antenna acrobatics to find a placement that works. There also seems to be a lot more analog multipath distortion on 99.5.
93.7 is also much more solid in the car around the Boston metro. 99.5 suffers from more picket-fencing, multipath, and more generally weak/noisy spots. I think that if Mike is switched to 99.5, a lot of immediate Boston area listeners would complain of lesser quality reception. That could be remedied with a 97.7 simulcast, but then listeners would have to get used to finding it, and the simulcast idea hasn't seemed to help WAAF's numbers all that much. Also, I'd like to see less repetitious simulcasting in overlapping areas and more different programming formats offered, but I guess that's unrealistic idealism...
|