RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 24, 2013, 07:37:11 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: WGGB Analog to go off the air Dec 1, 2008  (Read 1325 times)
KML-224
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3038


Re: WGGB Analog to go off the air Dec 1, 2008
« Reply #10 on: November 11, 2008, 12:29:00 PM »

Oh yeah! Duh! Forgot about them! What channel will they have to move to next year? (I know channel 67 will no longer be available.)
Logged
dhett
OTA Holdout
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3657

Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.


Re: WGGB Analog to go off the air Dec 1, 2008
« Reply #11 on: November 11, 2008, 01:53:11 PM »

WSHM-LP has nothing in the works right now.  They wanted to move analog to ch 45, but that was dismissed, then they had a digital displacement application for ch 49, but that was also dismissed.

I'm surprised they don't have anything.  It was my understanding that all TV had to clear off of chs 60-69, and that LPTV stations could continue to use chs 52-59 on a secondary basis, i.e., as long as they don't cause interference to primary services in that band.

I know of several other LPTV stations in the upper-700 MHz band that still have no plans to vacate.
Logged

Dave
facebook.com/david.hettesheimer
KML-224
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3038


Re: WGGB Analog to go off the air Dec 1, 2008
« Reply #12 on: November 11, 2008, 02:31:42 PM »

My question is: Why do they even need low-power channel 67 in the first place? Can't the cable headend just receive WFSB-DT 3-2 from Avon Mountain or whatever?
Logged
dhett
OTA Holdout
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3657

Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.


Re: WGGB Analog to go off the air Dec 1, 2008
« Reply #13 on: November 11, 2008, 06:52:52 PM »

That just might be the plan.
Logged

Dave
facebook.com/david.hettesheimer
necrat123
Guest
Re: WGGB Analog to go off the air Dec 1, 2008
« Reply #14 on: November 11, 2008, 07:23:39 PM »

WSHM-LP has nothing in the works right now. 

Oh yes they do. They've applied to use digital 41 from a small tower in Russell. (Near Woronoco section of Westfield).
The plan is to have a signal strong enough to hit the required Comcast and Charter head ends. The fcc granted them use of Ch 41 from Mt Tom, but they applied to operate digitally from the above-said tower. The thing is, you won't find the application easily, as the channel 41
has a different facility ID (168233) than the 67 facility (67980).

Here is the 41 construction permit.
http://www.fccinfo.com/CMDProEngine.php?sCurrentService=TV&tabSearchType=Appl&sAppIDNumber=1248359



Logged
dhett
OTA Holdout
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3657

Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.


Re: WGGB Analog to go off the air Dec 1, 2008
« Reply #15 on: November 11, 2008, 07:33:50 PM »

WSHM-LP has nothing in the works right now. 

Oh yes they do. They've applied to use digital 41 from a small tower in Russell. (Near Woronoco section of Westfield).
The plan is to have a signal strong enough to hit the required Comcast and Charter head ends. The fcc granted them use of Ch 41 from Mt Tom, but they applied to operate digitally from the above-said tower. The thing is, you won't find the application easily, as the channel 41
has a different facility ID (168233) than the 67 facility (67980).

Here is the 41 construction permit.
http://www.fccinfo.com/CMDProEngine.php?sCurrentService=TV&tabSearchType=Appl&sAppIDNumber=1248359

Whoops.  Looked up WSHM-LP, which would be the analog station and any flash cut applications, but omitted WSHM-LD, which is a DTV companion channel.  The FCC lists LPTV digital companion channels separately from the analog, but lists full-power digital companion channels together with the analog.  Had I left the "-LP" suffix off my query, I'd have found both.
Logged

Dave
facebook.com/david.hettesheimer
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.403 seconds with 19 queries.