RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 18, 2013, 11:56:13 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 1150 changes  (Read 471 times)
KJCB
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4384


1150 changes
« on: September 12, 2005, 08:33:24 PM »

I realize brokered talk isn't tops on most people's list, but this station is SO much worse than even bad brokered stations. Can somebody please spruce this thing up? Cancel the quack metaphysical hosts paying squat rates, put on Dr. Laura or Glenn Beck or somebody in drive times, build an audience, and sell time at high rates. I'm doing this as a public service so no one has to hear EVERY CALLER hang up, hosts who can't hear guests, callers who can't hear hosts, board ops moderating shows, stopsets whenever they feel like them, and :47 commercials.

Now who has the (small) money needed to save this failure?
Logged
Rob Stutson
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 864

Occupation: Air Talent


Re: 1150 changes
« Reply #1 on: September 12, 2005, 09:14:04 PM »

> I realize brokered talk isn't tops on most people's list,
> but this station is SO much worse than even bad brokered
> stations. Can somebody please spruce this thing up? Cancel
> the quack metaphysical hosts paying squat rates, put on Dr.
> Laura or Glenn Beck or somebody in drive times, build an
> audience, and sell time at high rates. I'm doing this as a
> public service so no one has to hear EVERY CALLER hang up,
> hosts who can't hear guests, callers who can't hear hosts,
> board ops moderating shows, stopsets whenever they feel like
> them, and :47 commercials.
>
> Now who has the (small) money needed to save this failure?
>

Ain't gonna happen.  Marginal signal, no budget for even bartered programming, let alone paid syndication.  As long as the bills are being paid - you won't be seeing any programming changes at 1150.
Logged
KJCB
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4384


Re: 1150 changes
« Reply #2 on: September 12, 2005, 10:26:00 PM »

> Ain't gonna happen.  Marginal signal, no budget for even
> bartered programming, let alone paid syndication.  As long
> as the bills are being paid - you won't be seeing any
> programming changes at 1150.

Yea, but are they even paying the bills with the rates they charge for hours in morning drive? Just seems that they could brand themselves as a mainstream station and get mortgage brokers to pay $600/hr. Thanks.
Logged
KNBQ
Guest
Re: 1150 changes
« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2005, 08:34:32 PM »

> I realize brokered talk isn't tops on most people's list,
> but this station is SO much worse than even bad brokered
> stations. Can somebody please spruce this thing up? Cancel
> the quack metaphysical hosts paying squat rates, put on Dr.
> Laura or Glenn Beck or somebody in drive times, build an
> audience, and sell time at high rates. I'm doing this as a
> public service so no one has to hear EVERY CALLER hang up,
> hosts who can't hear guests, callers who can't hear hosts,
> board ops moderating shows, stopsets whenever they feel like
> them, and :47 commercials.
>
> Now who has the (small) money needed to save this failure?
>
 I got an idea for Sandusky, BLOW UP KKNW! Why not just simulcast KLSY, your
favorite FM. You guys did it years ago on 1540 (now KXPA). The programs on KKNW
are just plain lame. If I want infomecials, I'll watch cable tv. Or better yet,
sell KKNW to Salem. Yea, now's there's the ticket! (They just love low power AM's. )
Logged
KJCB
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4384


Re: 1150 changes
« Reply #4 on: September 16, 2005, 05:51:24 AM »

> (They
> just love low power AM's. )

I know there are the proverbial 50kw flamethrowers, but most AMs on the dial don't have 6kw at night. Is the signal really that bad?
Logged
semoochie
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1476


Re: 1150 changes
« Reply #5 on: September 16, 2005, 01:56:57 PM »

> > (They
> > just love low power AM's. )
>
> I know there are the proverbial 50kw flamethrowers, but most
> AMs on the dial don't have 6kw at night. Is the signal
> really that bad?
>
If you go back far enough, this frequency was one of the major players!  They even had their own TV station!
Logged
KNBQ
Guest
Re: 1150 changes
« Reply #6 on: September 18, 2005, 05:39:40 PM »

> > > (They
> > > just love low power AM's. )
> >
> > I know there are the proverbial 50kw flamethrowers, but
> most
> > AMs on the dial don't have 6kw at night. Is the signal
> > really that bad?
> >
> If you go back far enough, this frequency was one of the
> major players!  They even had their own TV station!
>
 I've heard that they had a 5kW non directional transmitter before they
moved to the eastside, with their current directional site. Why change sites?
I would think that their signal would have been alot better then than now.
Yes, they did have a TV station, KRSC-TV ch.5, KRSC-FM 98.1 and of course
KRSC 1150. (KING-FM was @ 94.9)
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.462 seconds with 20 queries.