RadioDiscussions.com

 
Login June 19, 2013, 05:33:31 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: More Nassau cutbacks  (Read 18213 times)
taylorjsdad
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 188


Re: More Nassau cutbacks
« Reply #120 on: October 05, 2009, 06:42:58 PM »

splicer38 is right...although don't compare shapiro programming to the upper valley.  very sloppy. in fact just pathetic.  it's funny how you can tell know one cares, or wants to be there, just by listening.

thanks for the paycheck jeffy. 

smooches,

Mary ;-)

The only station of his I listen to is WXXK and I think they could do a much better job.   On-air sound is very loose and compared to the Upper Valley's Wolf the on-air staff quite poor.   
Logged
BenKarlow
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 130


Re: More Nassau cutbacks
« Reply #121 on: October 05, 2009, 07:54:17 PM »

splicer38 is right...although don't compare shapiro programming to the upper valley.  very sloppy. in fact just pathetic.  it's funny how you can tell know one cares, or wants to be there, just by listening.

thanks for the paycheck jeffy. 

smooches,

Mary ;-)

The only station of his I listen to is WXXK and I think they could do a much better job.   On-air sound is very loose and compared to the Upper Valley's Wolf the on-air staff quite poor.   

Well, the clients love it, and that's all that matters. 
Logged
Xkrusdx
thanx for listening.
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 136


Re: More Nassau cutbacks
« Reply #122 on: October 06, 2009, 12:48:51 AM »

all of the staff 5:30 A.M.-7:00 P.M. lives within the Valley though.  Same with the local weekenders.
Logged
splicer38
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 177


Re: More Nassau cutbacks
« Reply #123 on: October 06, 2009, 08:38:20 AM »

In case it was not reported... Detone and Walton both ended up at the River. 
Logged
taylorjsdad
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 188


Re: More Nassau cutbacks
« Reply #124 on: October 06, 2009, 06:52:33 PM »

splicer38 is right...although don't compare shapiro programming to the upper valley.  very sloppy. in fact just pathetic.  it's funny how you can tell know one cares, or wants to be there, just by listening.

thanks for the paycheck jeffy. 

smooches,

Mary ;-)

The only station of his I listen to is WXXK and I think they could do a much better job.   On-air sound is very loose and compared to the Upper Valley's Wolf the on-air staff quite poor.   

Well, the clients love it, and that's all that matters. 

That may be true but I bet many of those same clients are spending money with Nassau as well.   I understand this market is more on relationships than quality programming and ratings (I bet there has not been a book for the Upper Valley in at least a year.)   

The shame of it is that when I was learning the craft of broadcasting, it was the quality of your programming which brought in the advertising dollars.   Maybe if some operators would remember that they would make more with their stations.

Logged
ThatGuyOnTheRadio
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1165


Re: More Nassau cutbacks
« Reply #125 on: October 07, 2009, 06:34:23 PM »

Sounds as though WNHW has moved to Gilford, with WJYY next.
Logged
NHRadio
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1147


Re: More Nassau cutbacks
« Reply #126 on: October 07, 2009, 07:03:00 PM »

That's what a Nassau employee told me today.


Sounds as though WNHW has moved to Gilford, with WJYY next.
Logged
Xkrusdx
thanx for listening.
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 136


Re: More Nassau cutbacks
« Reply #127 on: October 07, 2009, 07:30:09 PM »

forget about cutting airstaff, seems like they cut out a whole station.  No sign of 1230-WTSV Claremont, N.H. "ESPN Radio, The Score" in over a month.
Logged
taylorjsdad
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 188


Re: More Nassau cutbacks
« Reply #128 on: October 10, 2009, 08:29:20 AM »

forget about cutting airstaff, seems like they cut out a whole station.  No sign of 1230-WTSV Claremont, N.H. "ESPN Radio, The Score" in over a month.


I was wondering about that myself.   I like to tune in to them on Sundays on the way to pick up my daughter and could not. 
Logged
jlehmann
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1969


Re: More Nassau cutbacks
« Reply #129 on: October 10, 2009, 09:30:19 AM »

forget about cutting airstaff, seems like they cut out a whole station.  No sign of 1230-WTSV Claremont, N.H. "ESPN Radio, The Score" in over a month.


I was wondering about that myself.   I like to tune in to them on Sundays on the way to pick up my daughter and could not. 

From the FCC website: https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws.exe/prod/cdbs/forms/prod/cdbsmenu.hts?context=25&appn=101321244&formid=910&fac_num=17795

Quote
ON JUNE 25, 2009 THE TRANSMITTER FOR WSTV SUSTAINED A CATASTROPHIC FAILURE WITHIN THE POWER SUPPLY SECTION. THIS TRANSMITTER IS NO LONGER SUPPORTED BY THE MANUFACTURER, AND NASSAU HAS EXHAUSTED ITS OWN SUPPLY OF SPARE PARTS. NASSAU HAS BEEN UNSUCCESSFUL IN OBTAINING PARTS FROM THIRD PARTY SOURCES OR IDENTIFYING NEW SOURCES THROUGH INTERNET SEARCHES. THEREFORE, NASSAU RESPECTFULLY REQUESTS RELIEF FROM THE MINIMUM OPERATING SCHEDULE REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION 73.1740 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES AND AUTHORITY FOR THE STATION TO REMAIN DARK FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS UNTIL NEW EQUIPMENT CAN BE IDENTIFIED AND OBTAINED.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.134 seconds with 19 queries.