RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 19, 2013, 09:02:00 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Overnight Transmitter Monitoring-KMYZ  (Read 519 times)
StonesRock
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 102


Overnight Transmitter Monitoring-KMYZ
« on: October 09, 2005, 11:43:23 AM »

I was talking with a friend that works for Shamrock in Tulsa.

He told me that KMYZ & KTSO do not have an operator in the building during the overnight.

Is it legal to allow stations to run without a person taking readings or monitoring the station?  

I realize that EAS can be automated and that transmitters can call the engineer if there is a problem.  Just strikes me as odd that you can close the radio station for 5-6 hours and walk away.
Logged
MrMaestro
Guest
Re: Overnight Transmitter Monitoring-KMYZ
« Reply #1 on: October 09, 2005, 02:01:11 PM »

It is legal. The only thing is with regard to meter readings, and as long as there is a remote control, all is well in Radio Land, post de-regulation.
Logged
Kent
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4203


Re: Overnight Transmitter Monitoring-KMYZ
« Reply #2 on: October 09, 2005, 04:20:42 PM »

> I was talking with a friend that works for Shamrock in
> Tulsa.
> He told me that KMYZ & KTSO do not have an operator in the
> building during the overnight.
> Is it legal to allow stations to run without a person taking
> readings or monitoring the station?  

Yes, it's legal in most cases.  There are some exceptions, like if a station does not have stable equipment or if it's a directional AM signal that does not have automated equipment.  Readings, and even transmitter logs in many cases, are no longer required (unless there's an exception condition).  The station log, which still is required, can take the place of a transmitter log, which used to be one part of a station log, in a lot of situations.  You simply have to have enough of a record to prove that your transmitter equipment is stable.  I've heard Cox practices this as well, though KRMG would require automated transmitter equipment.
 
> I realize that EAS can be automated and that transmitters
> can call the engineer if there is a problem.  Just strikes
> me as odd that you can close the radio station for 5-6 hours
> and walk away.

Well, when you think about it, it's really not all that odd because transmitter equipment is so stable.  It's just different from our old routine.  The station attendance rules were designed when transmitters had to have constant attention because the technology was not as advanced as it is now.  I worked at one station for about three years and never once had to adjust power, even in icing conditions, because it was a solid-state transmitter that was THAT reliable.  In the entire three years I was there, it never had even a single hiccup and no operator ever had to adjust the power.  The engineers touched it a few times during routine maintenance and tower work, but those were the only times the power was adjusted in that three years.  

The station I work for now, by the way, is one that we just walk away from and leave unattended in nights and overnights.  It took me some getting used to as well, but I kinda like it now.  I remember working at a station when the PD was fired on the Friday evening before Thanksgiving.  No one other than management and those in the building at the time knew about it.  When he went home, he called all of his weekenders and told them they had the entire next week off.  I was the night guy, and my relief did not arrive at midnight.  I made frantic phone calls only to find my relief left town immediately after hearing he was off for the week to visit his family in Chicago.  Our utility fill-in guy left town, too.  There was literally not a part-timer within 100 miles of the station, and our overnight guy already had the week off.  I worked all night and a good portion of the next morning because the station had to be attended, and there was no one else who could do it.  I worked an extra 10 hours that weekend (midnight to 10 AM Saturday) before getting some of the full-time staff back in.  The fact that I know that will never happen where I am now really helped getting used to unattended operation!
Logged
StonesRock
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 102


Re: Overnight Transmitter Monitoring-KMYZ
« Reply #3 on: October 09, 2005, 10:26:14 PM »

Great information.  Thank you for sharing.



> It is legal. The only thing is with regard to meter
> readings, and as long as there is a remote control, all is
> well in Radio Land, post de-regulation.
>
Logged
hello4
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 227


Re: Overnight Transmitter Monitoring-KMYZ
« Reply #4 on: October 10, 2005, 08:23:41 PM »

Yep, just to show my age, about 15 years ago, at the end of my shift I would (don't freak out, kids) load up the four reel-to-reels from the syndicated format provider, and they were programmed to segue via audio cues to start the next machine up when the tape ran out on the previous one.  Come the end of #4, approximately, it was time for the morning show to come in and take over.  Once I did something wrong, and as I listened on my fairly-long commute home, the music died, and I got to turn back around and fix my fubar!  I don't remember what I didn't do, but I remember I was ticked, because it was in the middle of a blinding rainstorm.  Come to think of it, maybe I had stayed late to work on airchecks before I left, and #1 finished without #2 kicking in.
Logged
bueller
Guest
Re: Overnight Transmitter Monitoring-KMYZ
« Reply #5 on: October 13, 2005, 05:05:20 AM »

KMYZ used to have an overnight jock last I heard them. Did they go automated in overnights?
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.29 seconds with 20 queries.