RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 23, 2013, 11:54:29 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The end of ota hdtv?  (Read 1676 times)
Skynet74
was here
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 5298


Re: The end of ota hdtv?
« Reply #10 on: December 03, 2009, 11:17:59 PM »

This won't happen. The public outcry would be way to much. Don't even worry about it. TV stations wern't just fitted with all new equipment for nothing. The FCC didn't just assign all new frequencies for nothing. Billions of dollars haven't just been invested from all sides for nothing. This won't even happen in our lifetime. 
Logged

Follow me on Twitter
http://twitter.com/skynet74
dhett
OTA Holdout
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3656

Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.


Re: The end of ota hdtv?
« Reply #11 on: December 04, 2009, 12:12:08 AM »

Adjacent channels don't even need to be 20 miles apart, actually they can be on the same tower.
In Sacramento KVIE DT 9 (6.1) and KXTV DT 10 (10.1) are broadcasting on the same super tower in Walnut Grove, same with most other stations in the Sacramento/Stockton/Modesto market..

You misunderstood - I said as long as they were within 20 miles, but that was incorrect - it's 20 km, or 12 miles.  Co-located adjacent channels are OK, and they can be separated by as many as 12 miles.  Adjacent channels are not allowed if separated by greater than 12 miles apart and less than about 68 miles (20 km - 110 km).  Greater than 68 miles is OK again.  Source: FCC regs sect. 73.623.
« Last Edit: December 04, 2009, 12:22:56 AM by dhett » Logged

Dave
facebook.com/david.hettesheimer
M.J.
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2078


Re: The end of ota hdtv?
« Reply #12 on: December 04, 2009, 05:53:05 PM »

NBC was an honest oversight in my original post. Stick that one where I put "secondary PBS".

As for all other services, they can exist as subchannels of other channels, particularly CW and MNTV. That's the way it already is in many markets including Rochester.

As for which channels will stay and which ones will go, there will be no need for government intervention. I foresee some networks may migrate to cable-only, especially some of the religious ones. The major longtime networks will keep OTA but I think some of the smaller ones might not.
Logged
tripinva
RabbitEars Webmaster
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1618


Re: The end of ota hdtv?
« Reply #13 on: December 04, 2009, 08:27:28 PM »

Now as for WBBM-TV on 12.1, they haven't shown any interest to go to UHF yet.

Yes they have.  They applied for a fill-in translator on channel 26 some months ago.

- Trip
Logged

RabbitEars.Info has launched!  Check it out!
avtosalon
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 179


Re: The end of ota hdtv?
« Reply #14 on: December 04, 2009, 10:10:54 PM »

Quote
However, WCPX 43.1 & WJYS 36.1 air mostly infomercials.  These 2 stations aren't worth having on the air.  WCPX would be alright if it was just Ion Life, and not Ion TV, as Ion Life has TV programs, while Ion TV has mostly infomercials.   I thought once WJYS put their digital signal in Chicago, and was able to remove the null toward Milwaukee, that they would air more programming.


The digital signal of WJYS Hammond, Indiana/Chicago is still directional to the south.  Even after moving their transmitter from Tinley Park, Illinois to Sears Tower, WJYS does not reach the north suburbs at all, and the station can not be received on the north side of Chicago with rabbit ears.  WJYS broadcasts on Channel 36 (Displays as 62-1 and 62-2) which was the same channel as a full-power analog signal from Milwaukee, but now the Milwaukee station has vacated the channel.  WJYS has applied to the FCC to remove the south-directional signal but so far that has not happened.

Also, co-owned low-power analog Channel 34 WEDE-CA Arlington Heights, Illinois (which is simulcast on digital 62-2) does not reach it's city of license.  The station broadcasts from Sears Tower with a directional signal to the southwest, but Arlington Heights is a northwest suburb.  Fans (in the north suburbs) of the music show 'JBTV', which airs on WEDE-CA and WJYS 62-2, are screwed.  Cable systems in the north suburbs air the main channel of WJYS but not the sub-channel.

         
« Last Edit: December 04, 2009, 10:13:54 PM by avtosalon » Logged
vchimpanzee
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 6562


Re: The end of ota hdtv?
« Reply #15 on: December 08, 2009, 02:19:15 PM »

I am a fairly astute reader of things electronic but have not seen the articles the first poster talks about; the demise of OTA TV.  Certain blogs have advanced this possibility but it seems in the realm of pure speculation at this time.
I watch for articles on the digital transition in Broadcasting & Cable online to keep the related Wikipedia articles updated, and most of what I see these days is about either mobile DTV, the next big thing, or this plan to end broadcast TV, or at least broadcast TV as we know it. Go to the references section of this article:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_broadband

Click on any article title if John Eggerton is the author.
Logged
Dave
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3590


Re: The end of ota hdtv?
« Reply #16 on: December 08, 2009, 08:34:03 PM »

Quote
However, WCPX 43.1 & WJYS 36.1 air mostly infomercials.  These 2 stations aren't worth having on the air.  WCPX would be alright if it was just Ion Life, and not Ion TV, as Ion Life has TV programs, while Ion TV has mostly infomercials.   I thought once WJYS put their digital signal in Chicago, and was able to remove the null toward Milwaukee, that they would air more programming.


The digital signal of WJYS Hammond, Indiana/Chicago is still directional to the south.  Even after moving their transmitter from Tinley Park, Illinois to Sears Tower, WJYS does not reach the north suburbs at all, and the station can not be received on the north side of Chicago with rabbit ears.  WJYS broadcasts on Channel 36 (Displays as 62-1 and 62-2) which was the same channel as a full-power analog signal from Milwaukee, but now the Milwaukee station has vacated the channel.  WJYS has applied to the FCC to remove the south-directional signal but so far that has not happened.

Also, co-owned low-power analog Channel 34 WEDE-CA Arlington Heights, Illinois (which is simulcast on digital 62-2) does not reach it's city of license.  The station broadcasts from Sears Tower with a directional signal to the southwest, but Arlington Heights is a northwest suburb.  Fans (in the north suburbs) of the music show 'JBTV', which airs on WEDE-CA and WJYS 62-2, are screwed.  Cable systems in the north suburbs air the main channel of WJYS but not the sub-channel.

WEDE-CA used to reach its COL until WISN turned on their digital signal for channel 34.  When WISN transmitted in digital, WEDE-CA was forced to redirect their signal away from Milwaukee.  I believe that happened when they were still a translator.  Unfortunately, translators, low power, & Class A stations aren't even required to cover their COL's.  If WEDE-CA really wants to cover their COL, then they should look at getting another channel (channel 32 is available now that WLS-TV decided to abandon adding a translator for 32, and went with 44 for a full power station, unless someone else put in for it).  As it stands, WEDE-CA isn't required to be added to cable systems, since they're not eligible for must carry on cable & satellite systems.  Cable systems have to decide if they want to add it themselves.

As for WJYS-DT, I'm surprised that they haven't removed their null toward Milwaukee yet.  They do have a CP to cover the northern suburbs, and increase their power.  They have a CP for 145kw at 510m.  It also calls for locating on the east tower, while the current antenna is on the west tower, transmitting 50kw at 455m.  Originally, WJYS had to put the null toward Milwaukee due to WMVT was on 36A/35DT, but has stayed on 35 on June 12th.  Now for WJYS-DT being on cable; cable systems are required to add the station, as long as the station requests it as part of the must carry rulling years ago.  Subchannels aren't eligible for must carry at this time.  If the rule gets changed in the future, then their simulcast of WEDE-CA might be added later on.


Now as for WBBM-TV on 12.1, they haven't shown any interest to go to UHF yet.

Yes they have.  They applied for a fill-in translator on channel 26 some months ago.
- Trip

They haven't used it yet.  If they were using it, then I would be able to receive the signal.  If the translator is for any of their viewers, I believe it's mainly for those in the city, close to downtown.  As for what I said that they haven't shown interest in going to UHF; I should have been clear on that.  I actually meant that they haven't shown any interest in moving their full power signal to the UHF, or they would have asked for a UHF channel before June.  For some reason, they wanted to stay on the VHF.  WBBM-TV was the only station in Chicago that never had their digital station on the UHF, like everyone else has.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.33 seconds with 20 queries.