Corporate, I was responding to db's response to you..
There might be a difference, in that he was let go, as opposed to leaving on his own.
This seemed to me to suggest that db said Ellis was let go, as leaving on his own. Randy did not leave on his own accord. His contract was not renewed. So, Ellis was let go, and Randy did not leave on his own.
Raymond is correct, I was referring to Ellis, only. To expand: I'm not privy to the details of talent contracts, but it would seem that the details of Ellis' non-compete might be different under different circumstances. If he (Ellis) leaves of his own accord, the non-compete applies; if he (Ellis) is let go (as was the case), the non-compete might not apply (or could conceivably be of shorter duration).
And of course, there could be various "out-clauses", on both sides; the contract could be structured as a series of one year (or other length) contracts, with renewal only if both sides agree; etc. Ellis is a lawyer, I'm sure he wouldn't have signed anything too onerous, but then he probably really wanted the opportunity to have his own daily show.