RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 23, 2013, 11:33:45 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Largest City Never To Have Had A TV Show Set In That Town  (Read 2678 times)
trusty
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1569

N.Ga.


Re: Largest City Never To Have Had A TV Show Set In That Town
« Reply #10 on: June 16, 2010, 11:10:01 PM »

I think there are one or two others besides Matlock and Designing Women set in Atlanta.
 Huh Huh
Logged
bpatrick
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 8903


Re: Largest City Never To Have Had A TV Show Set In That Town
« Reply #11 on: June 17, 2010, 06:16:05 AM »

There's one set in Atlanta that goes 'way back.
It was called This Is Alice; it was a sitcom about
a female Dennis the Menace that, IIRC, predates Dennis
on television by about a year (1958 to his 1959).  I also
believe Phyllis Coates, the first Lois Lane on television,
played her mom.

I've practically forgotten J.J. Starbuck, which is why
I don't remember that it was set in San Antonio.  But I
still can't think of one set in Tampa.  Can anyone think of
one set in either Louisville or Birmingham?
Logged
desertv
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 435


Re: Largest City Never To Have Had A TV Show Set In That Town
« Reply #12 on: June 17, 2010, 02:52:46 PM »

Out of the top 25 cities, I came up with one show for all but San Jose, Jacksonville, Austin, Fort Worth, Charlotte and El Paso.

The problem with San Jose and Fort Worth is they are too close to the "sexier" cities of San Francisco and Dallas and are of course part of those cities' media market.  If you are going to set a show in Florida, I guess Miami is seen as much cooler than Jacksonville.  Surely, there must have been a western set in or near El Paso in the 50s or 60s.  I don't know about Charlotte, but I'm surprised Austin has never been a tv show setting.  It is considered one of the "hippest" cities and tons of movies are filmed in Austin.

New York--Law & Order
Los Angeles--Adam 12
Chicago--Good Times
Houston--Judd For The Defense
Phoenix--Alice
(also the New Dick Van Dyke Show (Dick lived in Carefree at that time))
Philadelphia--Thirtysomething
San Antonio--J.J. Starbuck
Dallas--Dallas
San Diego--Simon & Simon
San Jose--
Detroit--Martin
San Francisco--Ironside
Jacksonville--
Indianapolis--One Day At A Time
Austin--
Columbus--Family Ties
Fort Worth--
Charlotte--
Memphis--Memphis Beat
Baltimore--Homicide
Boston--Cheers
El Paso--
Milwaukee--Happy Days
Denver--Dynasty
(also Mork & Mindy- actually in Boulder)
Seattle--Grey's Anatomy
Logged
landtuna
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 6498


Re: Largest City Never To Have Had A TV Show Set In That Town
« Reply #13 on: June 17, 2010, 04:25:52 PM »

Tucson - Petrochelli
Logged
Mark
Looking for a parody of laughs?
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3343


Re: Largest City Never To Have Had A TV Show Set In That Town
« Reply #14 on: June 17, 2010, 05:01:24 PM »


Columbus--Family Ties


Thanks a lot for that list, you rock!!!!. You win this months "King of TV" award  Grin

Question for "Family Ties," was it actually said, they were set in Columbus? I ask 'cause I have it on tape when Alex is renting rooms out, Alex says the family is in Dayton, OH. He says: "Keaton Manor in beautiful Dayton." It's often cut in syndication but WWME-CA (ME-TV in Chicago, runs the show uncut). Of course Ohio State is over 75 miles from Dayton.

So this could be a slip up by Michael J Fox that was never caught.

Several times Steven mentions Route 41 which runs through Springfield, OH, roughly half way between Columbus and Dayton, I guess you could call it Suburban Columbus.

Of course Alex drives Skippy TO Dayton to meet his real mother. This wouldn't be needed if they lived in Dayton.

But in the spin off "The Art of Being Nick" was in Dayton, but you could make a case that it wasn't an actual spinoff.




Logged
Tim from Springfield, IL
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1615


Re: Largest City Never To Have Had A TV Show Set In That Town
« Reply #15 on: June 17, 2010, 08:40:38 PM »


Columbus--Family Ties


Thanks a lot for that list, you rock!!!!. You win this months "King of TV" award  Grin

Question for "Family Ties," was it actually said, they were set in Columbus? I ask 'cause I have it on tape when Alex is renting rooms out, Alex says the family is in Dayton, OH. He says: "Keaton Manor in beautiful Dayton." It's often cut in syndication but WWME-CA (ME-TV in Chicago, runs the show uncut). Of course Ohio State is over 75 miles from Dayton.

So this could be a slip up by Michael J Fox that was never caught.

Several times Steven mentions Route 41 which runs through Springfield, OH, roughly half way between Columbus and Dayton, I guess you could call it Suburban Columbus.

Of course Alex drives Skippy TO Dayton to meet his real mother. This wouldn't be needed if they lived in Dayton.

But in the spin off "The Art of Being Nick" was in Dayton, but you could make a case that it wasn't an actual spinoff.


Actually, wasn't the "hometown" of Family Ties the fictitious Leland, OH (the home of Leland College, Alex's alma mater)--which is presumed to be a suburb of Columbus?
Logged
PDXREXX
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 103


Re: Largest City Never To Have Had A TV Show Set In That Town
« Reply #16 on: June 18, 2010, 12:00:02 AM »

Out of the top 25 cities, I came up with one show for all but San Jose, Jacksonville, Austin, Fort Worth, Charlotte and El Paso.

The problem with San Jose and Fort Worth is they are too close to the "sexier" cities of San Francisco and Dallas and are of course part of those cities' media market.  If you are going to set a show in Florida, I guess Miami is seen as much cooler than Jacksonville.  Surely, there must have been a western set in or near El Paso in the 50s or 60s.  I don't know about Charlotte, but I'm surprised Austin has never been a tv show setting.  It is considered one of the "hippest" cities and tons of movies are filmed in Austin.

New York--Law & Order
Los Angeles--Adam 12
Chicago--Good Times
Houston--Judd For The Defense
Phoenix--Alice
Philadelphia--Thirtysomething
San Antonio--J.J. Starbuck
Dallas--Dallas
San Diego--Simon & Simon
San Jose--
Detroit--Martin
San Francisco--Ironside
Jacksonville--
Indianapolis--One Day At A Time
Austin--
Columbus--Family Ties
Fort Worth--
Charlotte--
Memphis--Memphis Beat
Baltimore--Homicide
Boston--Cheers
El Paso--
Milwaukee--Happy Days
Denver--Dynasty
Seattle--Grey's Anatomy

and another Seattle based show
Here Come The Brides (1880's Seattle)
And another city
Minneapolis - Mary Tyler Moore
Logged
Braves2005
rimember

Online Online

Posts: 1521

Hobbies:computer,watching classic TV,Atlanta Braves baseball,San Antonio Spurs basketball,collecting records,newspapers,TV Guides,etc.,playing drums.


Re: Largest City Never To Have Had A TV Show Set In That Town
« Reply #17 on: June 18, 2010, 10:45:12 AM »

I think there are one or two others besides Matlock and Designing Women set in Atlanta.
 Huh Huh

Weren't BJ And The Bear and Sheriff Lobo set in Atlanta?
Logged
Braves2005
rimember

Online Online

Posts: 1521

Hobbies:computer,watching classic TV,Atlanta Braves baseball,San Antonio Spurs basketball,collecting records,newspapers,TV Guides,etc.,playing drums.


Re: Largest City Never To Have Had A TV Show Set In That Town
« Reply #18 on: June 18, 2010, 10:49:58 AM »

Add The Streets Of San Francisco and Too Close For Comfort for San Francisco.

And I don't think that there have been any TV shows that have been set in Butte, Montana or Boise, Idaho or anywhere else in those states.
Logged
BRNout
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4558

IBOC buzz-kill


Re: Largest City Never To Have Had A TV Show Set In That Town
« Reply #19 on: June 18, 2010, 10:50:06 AM »

I can't think of any shows based in Hartford, CT.  Providence - yes; Boston - heck yes; but Hartford? No.  
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.272 seconds with 20 queries.