RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 18, 2013, 07:53:44 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Why 1964?  (Read 4555 times)
landtuna
rimember

Online Online

Posts: 6470


Re: Why 1964?
« Reply #80 on: January 03, 2013, 10:19:09 PM »

I'm not going to ramble on anymore about this, because frankly, it's unfortunate that 90% of the hits don't get aired and it's rediculous! It is what it is, even though many of us cannot agree.

Which is exactly why my radio listening has switched from Oldies/Classic Hits to a much more open playlist which goes back into the 50's and includes many songs which are not specific to RnR.  It also explains why my mp3 player and PC library contains a huge number of those songs that never get played.
Logged
firepoint525
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 6493


Re: Why 1964?
« Reply #81 on: January 04, 2013, 09:36:53 AM »

This thread was originally a discussion of 1964. Remember Ringo, Hello Dolly, Mr. Lonely, Everybody Loves Somebody and There I've Said It Again? I hope you do, because these are five number-one hits from what is arguably the mostest bestest year for music...and they're ignored by classic hits stations in 2013.
I remember hearing "Ringo" ONLY when a local announcer did a daily chronological countdown of all the #1 hits from the '50s to (then) the '70s.  Even he said that he didn't think that he had heard it since it was popular.  The others on your list I used to hear from time to time, but I don't think that I ever hear any of them anymore.
Logged
BobSmolarek
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 171


Re: Why 1964?
« Reply #82 on: January 04, 2013, 10:18:15 AM »

Ringo did get some airplay on the original oldies stations, I can remember WFMV Blairstown NJ playing it, and it wasn't on a specialty program or a countdown.
Logged
radiobum
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 355


Re: Why 1964?
« Reply #83 on: January 04, 2013, 04:41:35 PM »

Why 1964 ?

"House Of The Rising Sun" alone justifies the year's exalted status !
Logged
Tom Wells
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4525

Antique Radio Repair/Restoration- Send a PM


Re: Why 1964?
« Reply #84 on: January 04, 2013, 07:23:47 PM »

Ringo is an essential song in my station playlist.
I can't imagine life without hearing Ringo OR the theme from "Bonanza", at least once a month or so.
Logged

Valparaiso Technical Institute 1982, Analog engineer, AM pt 15, inventor with 2 issued patents, former SW pirate. Now offering antique radio repair/restoration and alignment.  Stop just wishing that old radio worked!
AM1620 podcasts ->      http://thomasjwells.podomatic.com/
LARadioRewind
One of us is stupid and it's not you!
rimember

Online Online

Posts: 1117


Re: Why 1964?
« Reply #85 on: January 05, 2013, 07:17:36 PM »

Then I will make you happy by quoting one of my favorite lines from the Cartwrights' overworked housekeeper: "Four people alla time yelling! Only one Hop Sing!"
Logged
Biondi4Mayor
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 237


Re: Why 1964?
« Reply #86 on: January 07, 2013, 07:47:07 PM »

It would be more interesting to know why a hit song then is not a playable song now. 

Heck, any song is playable today, every last one of them. The reason why 90% of them get ignored is listener preferences, based on music testing and scoring that David and Michael Haggerty have countered with (the business side of things). I've said this before and I will say it again: "Every song is somebody's favorite"

Not everyone likes the same songs, that are heard on radio on any particular station, at any given time. Some tune away, most stay on.

Many complain about lack of quality music, frequent repetition and lengthy stop-sets, but other posters mention that as a result of testing, the results are replicated, meaning that since most will generally choose positives for frequently heard songs, others will do the same as a whole, so those are the songs that radio will play and nothing else.

My argument is that how can a test of 100 participants represent the entire listnener base for that station?  How? How can 100, represent 1,000,000?  They mention replication. I still don't understand the in's and out's of that theory, but that process is insisted.

This argument has gone on for years on these boards and I'll never get, as to how 100 can represent a population of one million. Everyone has their favorites and many of those songs do not get aired, that's a fact. Who says that an opinion of 100 can decide what the other 999,900 will want to listen on such station? That's absurd. I hear many complaints about the songs that are never aired, or personal hit favorites that are not in rotation.

I'm not going to ramble on anymore about this, because frankly, it's unfortunate that 90% of the hits don't get aired and it's rediculous! It is what it is, even though many of us cannot agree.



Preacher...Choir.  I'll carry on your rambling for you.  It sickens me that a handfull of people "represent" the masses.  Didn't David say something like only 15 meters on reflected the #1 LA station...WHAT!?!?!?

Anywho, 1964-----  I no longer here any of the Motown greats - "Where Did Our Love Go" and "My Guy" - used to be overplayed, but now there in the trash and I want them out. 

Really only the Beatles continue with airplay.
Logged

BEST online Oldies source - www.popgoldradio.com
jfrancispastirchak
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1590


Re: Why 1964?
« Reply #87 on: January 08, 2013, 06:00:37 PM »


Anywho, 1964-----  I no longer here any of the Motown greats - "Where Did Our Love Go" and "My Guy" - used to be overplayed, but now there in the trash and I want them out. 

This afternoon I heard the Supremes/Temptations, I'm Gonna Make You Love Me.  That song of course post-dates our 1964 window, but that same station rotates plenty of Mowtown, much of it from '64.   
Logged
LARadioRewind
One of us is stupid and it's not you!
rimember

Online Online

Posts: 1117


Re: Why 1964?
« Reply #88 on: January 08, 2013, 08:26:27 PM »

You know what I would love to hear? "Oh golly gee, Steve, no---please tell me!" I'd love to hear Dee Dee Warwick's original version of I'm Gonna Make You Love Me. It peaked at #88 in December of 1966. (Dee Dee was Dionne's younger sister.) In March of 1968, Madeline Bell got to #26 with a remake. Then came the Supremes/Temptations version, which got to #2 (behind Marvin Gaye's I Heard It Through The Grapevine).
Logged
Biondi4Mayor
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 237


Re: Why 1964?
« Reply #89 on: January 08, 2013, 08:37:02 PM »

You know what I would love to hear? "Oh golly gee, Steve, no---please tell me!" I'd love to hear Dee Dee Warwick's original version of I'm Gonna Make You Love Me. It peaked at #88 in December of 1966. (Dee Dee was Dionne's younger sister.) In March of 1968, Madeline Bell got to #26 with a remake. Then came the Supremes/Temptations version, which got to #2 (behind Marvin Gaye's I Heard It Through The Grapevine).

Funny you should mention Warwick's.  Heard it this weekend (online of course) at PopGoldRadio.com --- sorry for the plug (I'm not associated I swear  Smiley )

Well in my market (Chicago) Motown got the boot.  Save for a few on weekends at an urban station.  Glad to hear they're still around elsewhere.  I am a HUGE Motown freak (esp. Supremes/Temptations --- no finer records than that  Cool )
Logged

BEST online Oldies source - www.popgoldradio.com
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.361 seconds with 20 queries.