RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 18, 2013, 03:38:50 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: A new low for Rush Limbaugh (if that's not redundant)...  (Read 3582 times)
Holland Cooke
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2166


RE "I hope he fails." How can any American say that?
« Reply #30 on: November 14, 2010, 08:47:56 PM »

I was raised that whether your side won or lost an election, you always support..or at least work with...the winner.

Seems quaint now, eh?

Most-compelling TV of the year: Chilean miners' rescue.
Made you want to stand-up-and-cheer.
Countrymen, brothers, all-on-the-same-team.
We envy 'em.
Logged
Board Editor 1
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2154


Re: A new low for Rush Limbaugh (if that's not redundant)...
« Reply #31 on: November 15, 2010, 06:46:14 AM »

Some posts from this thread have been moved to Take It Outside


http://boards.radio-info.com/smf/index.php?topic=179119.msg1562830#msg1562830
Logged
Don C
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 550


Re: RE "I hope he fails." How can any American say that?
« Reply #32 on: November 15, 2010, 08:53:04 AM »

Seems quaint now, eh?

Most-compelling TV of the year: Chilean miners' rescue.
Made you want to stand-up-and-cheer.
Countrymen, brothers, all-on-the-same-team.
We envy 'em.

All we have to do is put our lawmakers in a mine during their sessions and bring them out in an oversized cigar tube at the end.
Logged
UpstateNYBill
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 201


Re: A new low for Rush Limbaugh (if that's not redundant)...
« Reply #33 on: November 15, 2010, 01:43:01 PM »

I thought Rush's previous low was that cheezy soft keyboard music output they put out in the early 90's.
Logged
Holland Cooke
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2166


New Topic
« Reply #34 on: November 15, 2010, 03:07:56 PM »

Rush broke Rule 1: "Only pick on people bigger than you are," when he did a whole segment today ON ED SCHULTZ, complete with what-Rush-calls "audio sound bites" from Ed's Friday TV show.

We'll howl-about-it, on "The Ed Show" tonight, 6-7ET, on MSNBC.

Hopefully, El Rushbo will still be airchecking...

HC

PS: If it's a sound bite...on radio...it WOULD be audio, right?
Logged
Holland Cooke
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2166


IDEA: Bug-out?
« Reply #35 on: November 16, 2010, 11:54:57 AM »

Suggestion: If Speech is more-Free at TIO, let's discontinue this conversation here, and simply migrate to:

http://boards.radio-info.com/smf/index.php?topic=179119.msg1562830#msg1562830
Logged
Holland Cooke
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2166


It's official...
« Reply #36 on: December 03, 2010, 04:47:25 PM »

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/12/3/925203/-Talk-Radio-Embarrassment-of-the-Year:-Rush-Limbaugh
Logged
Silkie
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 11273

No irony there.


Re: A new low for Rush Limbaugh (if that's not redundant)...
« Reply #37 on: December 03, 2010, 04:59:28 PM »

Nobody cares.
Logged

Be yourself, everybody else is already taken. - Oscar Wilde
Holland Cooke
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2166


RE "Nobody cares."
« Reply #38 on: December 04, 2010, 07:48:00 AM »

It's worse than that!

Seems like nobody-who-manages-a-Limbaugh-affiliate-station LISTENS.
They don't care-enough to LISTEN.
They don't have to.  Syndicated programming is plug-N-chug, the station is on auto-pilot.
This once-great station is now dismissively referred to as "the AM."
Meanwhile management spends disproportionate time propping-up sister music FMs that are losing to iPod, Pandora, et al.
(http://hollandcookemedia.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/nielsen-audiominutes.jpg?w=468&h=342)

Managers of Limbaugh affiliates hear-ABOUT -- rather than hear, in real-time -- these offensive episodes.

Few industries exemplify what's-wrong-with the economy better than radio.
Big picture: Why we're in a global recession: debt.
The world's people spent more-money-than-there-is-in-the-world.

Zoom-into close-up shot of radio: 1996 de-regulation went too far.
Station-trading pig-out resulted in untenable debt.
Stations can no longer afford to do the local programming that made radio unique.
So Rush Limbaugh is now -- in late-Bush-era corporate bailout parlance -- "too big to fail."
« Last Edit: December 04, 2010, 07:51:33 AM by Holland Cooke » Logged
MattParker
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1201


Re: Amen
« Reply #39 on: December 04, 2010, 08:00:05 AM »

It's worse than that!

Seems like nobody-who-manages-a-Limbaugh-affiliate-station LISTENS.
They don't care-enough to LISTEN.
They don't have to.  Syndicated programming is plug-N-chug, the station is on auto-pilot.
This once-great station is now dismissively referred to as "the AM."
Meanwhile management spends disproportionate time propping-up sister music FMs that are losing to iPod, Pandora, et al.
(http://hollandcookemedia.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/nielsen-audiominutes.jpg?w=468&h=342)

Managers of Limbaugh affiliates hear-ABOUT -- rather than hear, in real-time -- these offensive episodes.

Few industries exemplify what's-wrong-with the economy better than radio.
Big picture: Why we're in a global recession: debt.
The world's people spent more-money-than-there-is-in-the-world.

Zoom-into close-up shot of radio: 1996 de-regulation went too far.
Station-trading pig-out resulted in untenable debt.
Stations can no longer afford to do the local programming that made radio unique.
So Rush Limbaugh is now -- in late-Bush-era corporate bailout parlance -- "too big to fail."

Amen.

But let's remember who brought radio "deregulation."  The Democrats, generally, and specifically, the inventor of the Internet, Al Gore.  Only Nixon could go to China and only Al Gore could deregulate broadcasting.  Like station managers don't listen, so-called progressives don't follow the money when Democrats are involved.

Remember the good old days when broadcasting was regulated, people listened and stations were profitable?  The old regs were supposed to serve the public interest, convenience and necessity.  Maybe instead they protected suits from their own avarice and incompetence.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.186 seconds with 20 queries.