RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 22, 2013, 10:41:10 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: WPLJ To Pick Up Alt-Rock Format?  (Read 951 times)
MarcR
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 542


Re: WPLJ To Pick Up Alt-Rock Format?
« Reply #10 on: November 02, 2005, 08:22:53 PM »

>  I have to disagree with you there they didnt play it too
> safe at all in fact that didnt play the tight songs and they
> werent the safe ones. They got right abord the Limp Bizkit
> bandwagon because Steve Kingston's whole orientation was New
> Jjersey he thought that the only way to get an audience was
> to superserve the angry teens, and that is a major reason
> why they failed. By the time Rob Cross came into the picture
> they were well established as the nu metal station that
> could never shakle that rep that and the fact that New York
> is just not a rock town I know noone likes hearing it but
> all rock sticks ahave failed WNEw the legendary station
> witha one share which is getting better numbers now playing
> classic dance than they ever did as a rock station, Q104
> which in truth was one of teh worst programmed active rock
> stations ever heard and finally krock.
>
  You might've had an interesting point or two to make but I can hardly
understand a damn thing you wrote. You need to reign in those run-on sentences!
(PS: You Are Indeed A Boring Windbag! LOL!!)
Logged
Norm Rosen
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 411


Re: WPLJ To Pick Up Alt-Rock Format?
« Reply #11 on: November 03, 2005, 10:03:51 AM »

WXRK is doing so well that they are dumping it's format.
Not a good argument
 Could there be a possibility WPLJ will pick up alt-rock by
>
> > Jan. 6, '06?  If WPLJ flips from hot AC to alt-rock, then
> > WNEW could throw in some hot AC/AAA based artists.
> >
>
>
>
>
> My_Humps:
>
> Why would WPLJ experiment with a format that has FAILED WXRK
> and PLJ is doing well with its demographics?
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>

______________
Norm Rosen

Logged

Norm Rosen
thataveragejoe
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 864

I'm not really Joe...


Re: WPLJ no but...
« Reply #12 on: November 03, 2005, 10:19:52 AM »

> Could there be a possibility WPLJ will pick up alt-rock by
> Jan. 6, '06?  

PLJ?Huh No. Def Not.
I think you could make an argument about CD 101.9 flipping. That would be an interesting discussion.


>If WPLJ flips from hot AC to alt-rock, then
> WNEW could throw in some hot AC/AAA based artists.

Again no. 107.1 WXPK is already AAA.
Logged

I am not a pessimist, I'm an optimist with experience.
DavidEduardo
rimember

Online Online

Posts: 24792

“Fashion changes, but style endures.” - Chanel


Re: WPLJ no but...
« Reply #13 on: November 03, 2005, 10:37:27 AM »

> > Could there be a possibility WPLJ will pick up alt-rock by
>
> > Jan. 6, '06?  
>
> PLJ?Huh No. Def Not.
> I think you could make an argument about CD 101.9 flipping.

WQCD bills as much as or just slightly more than WPLJ. The chances of it flipping are about as close to zero as you can get.

> That would be an interesting discussion.

And decidedly one-sided.
Logged

“Change will not come if we wait for some other person, or if we wait for some other time. We are the ones we've been waiting for. We are the change that we seek.” - Barack Obama

www.americanradiohistory.com - Broadcasting Magazine and Yearbooks and RCA Broadcast News, Television Magazine & More.
thataveragejoe
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 864

I'm not really Joe...


Re: WPLJ no but...
« Reply #14 on: November 03, 2005, 10:53:03 AM »

> > I think you could make an argument about CD 101.9
> flipping.
>
> WQCD bills as much as or just slightly more than WPLJ. The
> chances of it flipping are about as close to zero as you can
> get.
>
> > That would be an interesting discussion.
>
> And decidedly one-sided.
>

Well now I see you are clearly just trying to personally attack me. But in any case you can make the argument based on the fact that Emmis owns the very sucessful alternative station Q101 in Chicago. If alternative to were to reappear in NY, it needs to be done right and that would be a good place to start. Anyone can share their opinion. After all, none of us knows what the future holds. You apparently feel the need to always be arrogant and right.
Logged

I am not a pessimist, I'm an optimist with experience.
CHRles
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 5170


Re: WPLJ no but...
« Reply #15 on: November 03, 2005, 12:33:32 PM »

>
> Well now I see you are clearly just trying to personally
> attack me. But in any case you can make the argument based
> on the fact that Emmis owns the very sucessful alternative
> station Q101 in Chicago. If alternative to were to reappear
> in NY, it needs to be done right and that would be a good
> place to start. Anyone can share their opinion. After all,
> none of us knows what the future holds. You apparently feel
> the need to always be arrogant and right.
>
He's not personally attacking you. He's just telling you something you don't want to hear - the truth! All David wrote is the facts about WQCD's billings.
All you're writing is propaganda, I mean I like Q-101 Chicago, but it's hardly what one would call a success ratings-wise.
Logged
Frish
Guest
Re: WPLJ To Pick Up Alt-Rock Format?
« Reply #16 on: November 03, 2005, 12:45:56 PM »

> >  I have to disagree with you there they didnt play it too
> > safe at all in fact that didnt play the tight songs and
> they
> > werent the safe ones. They got right abord the Limp Bizkit
>
> > bandwagon because Steve Kingston's whole orientation was
> New
> > Jjersey he thought that the only way to get an audience
> was
> > to superserve the angry teens, and that is a major reason
> > why they failed. By the time Rob Cross came into the
> picture
> > they were well established as the nu metal station that
> > could never shakle that rep that and the fact that New
> York
> > is just not a rock town I know noone likes hearing it but
> > all rock sticks ahave failed WNEw the legendary station
> > witha one share which is getting better numbers now
> playing
> > classic dance than they ever did as a rock station, Q104
> > which in truth was one of teh worst programmed active rock
>
> > stations ever heard and finally krock.
> >
>   You might've had an interesting point or two to make but I
> can hardly
> understand a damn thing you wrote. You need to reign in
> those run-on sentences!
> (PS: You Are Indeed A Boring Windbag! LOL!!)
>


 Think what you like about my grammar etc, but I also know what I am talking about in more posts than most.

 Ps You're just jealous!

 There, succinct enough for you?

LOl
Logged
Frish
Guest
Re: WPLJ no but...
« Reply #17 on: November 03, 2005, 12:52:23 PM »

> >
> > Well now I see you are clearly just trying to personally
> > attack me. But in any case you can make the argument based
>
> > on the fact that Emmis owns the very sucessful alternative
>
> > station Q101 in Chicago. If alternative to were to
> reappear
> > in NY, it needs to be done right and that would be a good
> > place to start. Anyone can share their opinion. After all,
>
> > none of us knows what the future holds. You apparently
> feel
> > the need to always be arrogant and right.
> >
> He's not personally attacking you. He's just telling you
> something you don't want to hear - the truth! All David
> wrote is the facts about WQCD's billings.
> All you're writing is propaganda, I mean I like Q-101
> Chicago, but it's hardly what one would call a success
> ratings-wise.
>
 Yeah q101 is a decent enough station but it isnt really "successful". For a station in market number 3 you cant name any of the airstaff with the exception of Mancow and they suffer a similar ratings quandry as krock and many of the Stern anchored stations. They dissapear after their morning show goes off. They just revamped the station with their "q101 on shuffle" approach meaning they moved away from their active rock incarnation (because they were being beaten by the Zone  there) and went back to a true alternative posture, luckily the Zone flipped and Q survived. Survival is not success by the standards you're suggesting.

 No personal attack meant here.
Logged
thataveragejoe
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 864

I'm not really Joe...


Re:well
« Reply #18 on: November 03, 2005, 12:55:36 PM »

> All you're writing is propaganda, I mean I like Q-101
> Chicago, but it's hardly what one would call a success
> ratings-wise.
>
Propaganda is a bit strong and poor choice of a word. There needs to be a defined cause as well as a fallacy of information. Since I am not promoting any cause whatsoever (merely an idea) nor have I made up things you would be incorrect.
Of course all of these threads about flipping random stations are rediculous. But anything is possible. Nearly no one thought CBSFM would go Jack of all things and look what happened. You can almost make a theory about any station doing something completely different, but that doesn't make it propaganda.
Logged

I am not a pessimist, I'm an optimist with experience.
thataveragejoe
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 864

I'm not really Joe...


q101
« Reply #19 on: November 03, 2005, 12:59:36 PM »

>  Yeah q101 is a decent enough station but it isnt really
> "successful". For a station in market number 3 you cant name
> any of the airstaff with the exception of Mancow and they
> suffer a similar ratings quandry as krock and many of the
> Stern anchored stations. They dissapear after their morning
> show goes off. They just revamped the station with their
> "q101 on shuffle" approach meaning they moved away from
> their active rock incarnation (because they were being
> beaten by the Zone  there) and went back to a true
> alternative posture, luckily the Zone flipped and Q
> survived. Survival is not success by the standards you're
> suggesting.
>
>  No personal attack meant here.
>

None taken Smiley And you are a little closer to what I meant. I meant Q101 is a better alternative station compared to others of its kind. I wasn't claiming that q101 did great in Chicago...apparently that's what everyone else thought. That is self explanatory.
Logged

I am not a pessimist, I'm an optimist with experience.
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.328 seconds with 19 queries.