RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 19, 2013, 04:55:00 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: A Trend Which May Help HD Radio Become Profitable  (Read 3381 times)
Savage
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3274


Re: A Trend Which May Help HD Radio Become Profitable
« Reply #30 on: April 29, 2011, 12:17:10 PM »

Again: the issue isn't whether Big Radio versus small operators are using HD subs as sources for analog translators.  IMO the problem is using HD as a tool to evade ownership caps, since the translators are in effect mini-Class A facilities in many major markets.

Maybe this doesn't apply in Detroit, but it does elsewhere.
Logged
local oscillator
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 230


Re: A Trend Which May Help HD Radio Become Profitable
« Reply #31 on: April 29, 2011, 05:29:24 PM »

These HD sidechannels on translators are a bad idea, no matter where they are and/or who put them on the air.  I can see this nonsense in time being the only thing separating HD Radio from its ultimate demise.  Isn't it telling that the only redeeming quality of this junk science is as a backdoor justification to independently program an analog translator?

Here's an interesting thread on the Detroit situation from the Michigan Buzzboard:  http://mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=32385.
Logged
Savage
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3274


Re: A Trend Which May Help HD Radio Become Profitable
« Reply #32 on: April 30, 2011, 10:02:01 AM »

If "in time" is the time horizon for the HD subs being the only factor separating HD Radio from oblivion, time has galloped into fast-forward mode like an obscenity delay whose DUMP button has just been pushed.  There is literally no broadcaster or listener interest in the digital signals, other than a handful of industry enthusiasts, engineers with careers invested in HD and a tiny but loud band of consumer-tinkerers.  Oh yes, and NPR, which finds HD a nice way to shut up supporters clamoring for specialty formats....at NO expense to stations, thank you very much, pro-pubcaster Congress.

The industry is rife with reports of interference, rampant muting, silent carriers, coverage-hobbled HD signals, listener complaints, endless weird glitches plus local management distrust of HD subprogramming as possibly fragmenting precious listenership.  There are no receivers any more - at least not enough to mention.  Informed professional opinion about HD ranges from "profound disinterest" to "virulent hatred."

Using analog translators to generate an audience for HD subs is ba$$ackwards.  Can it be done?  Sure, but it kind of makes you wag your head in bewilderment.  So....the radio industry has bought an Aston-Martin classic roadster and turned it into a decorative planter?  Now THAT'S a smart use of resources....  Roll Eyes

Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.398 seconds with 20 queries.