RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 19, 2013, 06:58:52 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: KUSF (simulcasting KDFC) at reduced signal strength  (Read 2553 times)
buffalo1
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 21


KUSF (simulcasting KDFC) at reduced signal strength
« on: June 27, 2011, 04:57:24 PM »

The KDFC website reports that equipment work done on KUSF (90.3)  early Friday morning made things worse, rather than better. The signal is still, on Monday afternoon, barely audible in the North Bay, where it was not very strong, but at least listenable, before. The signal seems to be losing out to KWMR, 90.5, Pt. Reyes Station. It was not made clear if the work that created the problem was part of the relocation of the KUSF transmitter to a higher elevation site in Marin County.   
Logged
recto101
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3146


Re: KUSF (simulcasting KDFC) at reduced signal strength
« Reply #1 on: June 29, 2011, 12:10:50 PM »

I hope KDFC can serve the entire Bay Area well soon.
Logged
e-dawg
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1312


Re: KUSF (simulcasting KDFC) at reduced signal strength
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2012, 01:34:18 AM »

Is KDFC (KUSF) is broadcastiing from their new tower on Wolfback ridge?  Right now I can hear 90.3 signal in my apartment southern part of San Francisco.
Logged
DavidKaye
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2308

Okay, you got me. I wasn't going to be here, but


Re: KUSF (simulcasting KDFC) at reduced signal strength
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2012, 04:51:48 AM »

The KDFC website reports that equipment work done on KUSF (90.3)  early Friday morning made things worse, rather than better. The signal is still, on Monday afternoon, barely audible in the North Bay, [....]

Then why not listen on 89.9?  KDFC comes in just fine from Angwin through most of central Marin and into Sonoma and Napa counties.


Logged
brian.marchand
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 247


Re: KUSF (simulcasting KDFC) at reduced signal strength
« Reply #4 on: January 22, 2012, 12:51:48 AM »

KUSF 90.3 is broadcasting from their new tower. They filed a license to cover a couple weeks ago and the license has been granted by the FCC. I wonder if the signal is better now. I found this on their website.

http://www.kdfc.com/pages/9066018.php?

"*90.3 San Francisco Update: January 18, 2012*"

"The signal for 90.3 has been moved from the University of San Francisco campus (the current license holder of the signal) to a hill above Sausalito. The signal is in a testing phase. This will improve coverage from Northern Marin to SFO, and along the same latitudes in the East Bay on the west side of the hills from El Cerrito to Oakland, and possibly further south. Line of site constraints and building penetration issues may cause continued reception problems in some areas, but generally this new antenna location should be a vast improvement for many in the coverage area of this signal."

"We continue to look for solutions for improved coverage for areas still not covered by our current signals. Thanks for your patience and support."


Bill Lueth
President
Classical KDFC
« Last Edit: January 22, 2012, 12:57:24 AM by brian.marchand » Logged
weav
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 383

They PAID me to mess with radio gear?!


Re: KUSF (simulcasting KDFC) at reduced signal strength
« Reply #5 on: January 22, 2012, 11:29:23 AM »

"Line of site"?  I would expect the president of a classical station holding company to be more literate than that...

Logged
buffalo1
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 21


Re: KUSF (simulcasting KDFC) at reduced signal strength
« Reply #6 on: January 25, 2012, 11:10:10 AM »

KDFC and KUSF each broadcasting different selections of classical music and different announcements. This presumably has to do with the latter transmitter being tested at its new Marin County location, probably with recordings of earlier programs. I didn't expect to see KUSF moved to Marin until the FCC approved the sale of the station. The latest update on the KDFC website states that the University of San Francisco still owns KUSF. Perhaps the FCC granting permission for the transmitter move is an indication that they will probably approve the sale in the near future.     
Logged
buffalo1
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 21


Re: KUSF (simulcasting KDFC) at reduced signal strength
« Reply #7 on: February 20, 2012, 11:57:36 AM »

KDFC not heard since at least as early as 6 a.m. today. A strong carrier in the North Bay, but 'dead air'. KUSF heard with normal KDFC programs. Several persons have commented on the KDFC outage on their webpage, but no one from the station has responded.
Logged
e-dawg
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1312


Re: KUSF (simulcasting KDFC) at reduced signal strength
« Reply #8 on: May 08, 2012, 01:14:43 AM »

Speaking of KDFC, I know they will add a south bay signal on May 24th, 2012.  Is their Eureka/Arcata translator is still on the air or not?  I don't see them mention on their website, or on the radio.
Logged
travisl5678
SF Bay Area
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1567


Re: KUSF (simulcasting KDFC) at reduced signal strength
« Reply #9 on: May 08, 2012, 02:46:34 PM »

The Eureka translator has been silent for a while. I think it had something to with an interference issue with another translator that came on the air
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.379 seconds with 20 queries.