RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 20, 2013, 05:24:11 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Why they were on Top  (Read 3237 times)
johnbasalla
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1331


Why they were on Top
« on: July 18, 2011, 07:17:54 PM »

I believe I have discovered the main reason that during the 1950s, "I Love Lucy", "The Honeymooners" and to a lesser extent "The Phil Silvers Show - aka - "You'll Never Get Rich" were the sitcoms of note, and the ones that have stood the test of time better then the many other shows that were on the TV landscape during that decade. They were laugh out loud funny, whereas many of the other shows were mild in comparison. Those other shows had few riotous laugh out loud moments, replaced instead by pleasant "snickers". So credit goes to the writers and actors. I remember my father saying that someone told him "You gotta watch Jackie Gleason's "Honeymooners". My dad put it on, and it instantly became appointment television. Shows like "I Love Lucy" also had more energy. My favorite 1950s sitcom is "Topper", yet I notice how low key it is and I often leave an episode thinking..."they could have made it funnier".

Other shows that are up there in the laughs department were "Amos and Andy" and "The Burns and Allen Show", although to me, Burns and Allen suffered a little in the energy department.  I haven't seen enough episodes of "I Married Joan", but that may be a contender too.
Logged
cd637299
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3849


Re: Why they were on Top
« Reply #1 on: July 18, 2011, 07:26:06 PM »

I was alerted over 10 years ago by a radio guy, to check out "Burns & Allen" (our TV stations did not show it much when I was growing up).  He sent me 1 episode from the final season.....it was (I suppose) ahead of its time, especially as George talks to us during the action, not exactly, but something like:  "I better get in there now, or else there's no plot"....

Now that (finally) Antenna TV has it, I am recording it when I can.

I wish I had seen more of "Dobie Gillis."  Now I think it was way ahead of its time, as was B&A.....especially all the hyper-dialogue.

cd

Logged
landtuna
rimember

Online Online

Posts: 6487


Re: Why they were on Top
« Reply #2 on: July 18, 2011, 08:09:44 PM »

I haven't seen enough episodes of "I Married Joan", but that may be a contender too.

Don't bother.  A very poor imitation of "Lucy" despite the presence of the very funny Jim Backus.

And, although the sitcom's of the 50's may not have hit the humor meter as have more recent shows there were a plethora of variety shows that did.  Red Skelton, George Gobel, Steve Allen (and his wacky cast of characters) and, of course, Jack Benny. 
Logged
gregg75
STOP THE PRESSES !!!
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2754


Re: Why they were on Top
« Reply #3 on: July 18, 2011, 09:05:36 PM »

I watched a couple Dobie Gills episodes on Me-TV the other day. It was ok, but some of the
segments were pretty cartoonish. At the end it was almost like, well we're running out of
time..........how can we end this in 2 minutes.

I've noticed in a lot of the shows from this era PEOPLE ARE WEARING A LOT OF SWEATERS,
even the guys. There must have been some kind of sweater fad in the late 50's to early 60's.
Logged

Atlanta's BEST web-streaming Dance stations
(right click player page for faster connection)


Rhythmic AC/Disco-Dance-Funk 1975-1990+
http://www.krykey.com/Radio/PRSPage.aspx?id=956

Dance-House/Rhythmic AC (late 80's-today)
http://www.krykey.com/Radio/PRSPage.aspx?id=1885
Mark
Looking for a parody of laughs?
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3341


Re: Why they were on Top
« Reply #4 on: July 18, 2011, 09:52:37 PM »

I Love Lucy holds up because of the writing. I am a huge fan of OTR and a lot of the Lucy episodes are taken word for word from My Favorite Husband radio. It is just as funny on the radio.

I find Leave It To Beaver hold up well too. All though most people who knock it really haven't watched it much. I think it's amazing to have a show on that long and I can't recall one episode that focused on June or Ward. It was always the kids or Eddie or Lumpy.

I think I Married Joan was good in its own way. It's only when you compare it to Lucy that you get a false idea. Joan Davis was more physical and gawky in her comedy than, Lucille Ball, much like Cass Daley was.

Burn and Allen is a pale imitation of the radio show, as is Jack Benny both were hundreds of times funnier on radio.

The problem is both show had been around so long on radio they had too many inside jokes. And Jack Benny was even worse as he could start a show on one week and finish it on the next and there was not a lot of continuity between shows.

Gracie Allen was simply a genius and George pulled her strings. Gracie was not an ad libber and only spoke what was written but she pulled it off. When Chrissie "Three's Company" Snow or Rose "Golden Girls" Nyland, were confused but they came across as stupid and it wasn't always consistently so. Compare a similar show on radio called My Friend Irma, she was just stupid.

You actually believed Gracie had a thought disorder. Gracie didn't come across as stupid but simply illogical. This didn't transfer over to TV as well, because Gracie Allen was tired and sick (she had a weak heart)

My favourite example of this is Fred Allen. If you listen to him on radio he was hysterical, but it did not transfer over to TV well. If you saw the words come out of his mouth, it was offensive somehow.



Logged
RicoGregg
rimember

Online Online

Posts: 1784

The walking one and only


Re: Why they were on Top
« Reply #5 on: July 19, 2011, 03:38:51 AM »


Gracie Allen was simply a genius and George pulled her strings. Gracie was not an ad libber and only spoke what was written but she pulled it off. When Chrissie "Three's Company" Snow or Rose "Golden Girls" Nyland, were confused but they came across as stupid and it wasn't always consistently so. Compare a similar show on radio called My Friend Irma, she was just stupid.


You're darn tootin' that Gracie Allen was a genius. She was arguably the greatest female TV comic ever. Certainly one of the greatest.

Chrissy Snow/Suzanne Somers doesn't deserve to be in the same paragraph as Gracie. She couldn't carry Gracie's syntax.

Another thing that made me  Angry was back "in the day" when Roseanne Barr was married to Tom Arnold, calling herself Roseanne Arnold, and being on the cover of TV Guide with red hair, and comparing herself to Lucy, Gracie, and other femme greats. Made me sick.
Logged

"Go native. Go overt. Be animalistic, and always play fair." - R. Crumb
Limp73
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 475


Re: Why they were on Top
« Reply #6 on: July 19, 2011, 04:20:55 AM »

Phil Silvers played Sgt. Bilko to the hilt.
Lucy and the writes made I Love lucy the timeless classic that it is.
From what I've read on the web, Joan Davis was hateful and arrogant and Jim Backus had a hellish time working with her.
Topper was lighthearted stuff for the older folks in the 50s. Remembered watching sydnicated reruns of that show in the late 60s, despite the pre-ercorded laughtracks and applause....but that was quite common in that decade. Lucy was hysterically funny enough it didn't need a laughtrack.
Logged
firepoint525
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 6502


Re: Why they were on Top
« Reply #7 on: July 19, 2011, 09:43:52 AM »

The "roller coaster" episode of Leave It To Beaver was one of my fave episodes of that show.  I caught it on TV Land, then watched it again when I saw that they were going to air it again.  I loved roller coasters as a kid (and still do!).  While I was watching the roller coaster episode of Beaver on one of those occasions, my parents were also watching it at their home, and said that it reminded them of me!  Grin
Logged
cd637299
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3849


Re: Why they were on Top
« Reply #8 on: July 19, 2011, 09:55:44 AM »

The "roller coaster" episode of Leave It To Beaver was one of my fave episodes of that show.  I caught it on TV Land, then watched it again when I saw that they were going to air it again.  I loved roller coasters as a kid (and still do!).  While I was watching the roller coaster episode of Beaver on one of those occasions, my parents were also watching it at their home, and said that it reminded them of me!  Grin

I thought I saw almost every ep of Beaver....don't remember that one.  Could you run it down for me, and in which season?  (I would know the season by the openings.)

BTW "Dobie" & the 1952-58 episodes of "Burns & Allen" are *not* on DVD.  Only the public domain stuff....Antenna TV must really be butchering B&A for commercials.  Didn't B&A close each ep in front of a curtain ("Say goodnight, Gracie" "Goodnight, Gracie")?  That part is totally gone.  (Unless they did not do that for 1952-53.)

cd
Logged
Lkeller
rimember

Online Online

Posts: 6635


Re: Why they were on Top
« Reply #9 on: July 19, 2011, 10:18:09 AM »

I think your thesis is right-on, johnbasalla.  The high energy comedies that went for big laughs are timeless, and that makes sense.  American culture hasn't really changed that much in terms of what people find funny.  The old sitcoms that seem dated are the "mannered" and polite ones.

A good example is Life With Elizabeth.  I checked out an episode or two a couple of years ago in the middle of all that Betty White mania.  It was her first series. It has some amusing moments, but it moves like molasses, and seems very dated.

Here's a 1954 episode - I believe the announcer in the beginning is Jack Narz, later a game-show host: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzu-H6R3RG0
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.324 seconds with 20 queries.