RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 23, 2013, 12:49:27 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: WBZ-Loud and Clear plus UNID  (Read 4020 times)
IT_Guru
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 247


Re: WBZ-Loud and Clear plus UNID
« Reply #20 on: August 06, 2011, 10:30:45 AM »

Tonight poking around on the AM Band, I landed on 1030 and to my amazement WBZ, a station I kind of grew up with came in booming on the radio. Underneath 'BZ was a music station, it was weak and I couldn't tell what kind of music they were playing. It might have been religious music.

WEBS 1030 in Calhoun, GA broadcasts 24/7 and has an oldies format. They only run 3 watts at night so I doubt this is what you were hearing. WBZ starts overpowering them less than 5 miles from the transmitter. During the day they run 5,000 watts and can be heard in parts of North Metro Atlanta.
Logged
jd
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3960


Re: WBZ-Loud and Clear plus UNID
« Reply #21 on: August 06, 2011, 10:56:42 AM »

KCTA is a daytime, so unless they are operating during unlicensed hours as so many station are, that shouldn't be them.

I could be wrong but I'd also say it's unlikely that KCTA would be on at night; over the years they've pretty much played by the rules from what I've seen.

KCTA did pursue the idea of getting nighttime service with 1,000 watts several years back but there were some problems with the filing of the application and it was eventually dismissed.  It probably would have worked, although besides WBZ interference to Mexico City would have been a real concern.  Scroll down this page to see the pattern they had proposed: www.fccinfo.com/CMDProEngine.php?sCurrentService=AM&tabSearchType=Appl&sAppIDNumber=285382&sHours=N
« Last Edit: August 06, 2011, 11:11:01 AM by jd » Logged

Two trucks loaded with copies of Roget's Thesaurus collided in midtown Manhattan. Witnesses were stunned, startled, aghast, taken aback, shocked, rattled and awestruck.
MarioMania
California
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1256


Re: WBZ-Loud and Clear plus UNID
« Reply #22 on: August 06, 2011, 12:37:28 PM »

How about WBZ/KDKA IBOC?? Or is it too weak to interfere with both station??
Logged
radioman148
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 11749


Re: WBZ-Loud and Clear plus UNID
« Reply #23 on: August 06, 2011, 03:35:53 PM »

How about WBZ/KDKA IBOC?? Or is it too weak to interfere with both station??

Depending on where you are in the east it can be messy.
Logged
MarioMania
California
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1256


Re: WBZ-Loud and Clear plus UNID
« Reply #24 on: August 06, 2011, 10:47:11 PM »

Let's say Kentucky
Logged
radioman148
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 11749


Re: WBZ-Loud and Clear plus UNID
« Reply #25 on: August 07, 2011, 08:24:32 AM »

Let's say Kentucky

Dont know. I'm in Illinois.
Logged
cyberdad
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3080

Smoother, Fresher, Less Filling...That's Clear!


Re: WBZ-Loud and Clear plus UNID
« Reply #26 on: August 07, 2011, 01:00:06 PM »


KCTA did pursue the idea of getting nighttime service with 1,000 watts several years back but there were some problems with the filing of the application and it was eventually dismissed.  It probably would have worked, although besides WBZ interference to Mexico City would have been a real concern.  Scroll down this page to see the pattern they had proposed: www.fccinfo.com/CMDProEngine.php?sCurrentService=AM&tabSearchType=Appl&sAppIDNumber=285382&sHours=N

Interesting pattern in that it appears a small lobe is aimed somewhat (if not directly) toward Mexico City.  IME, Mexico City's 1030 is one of the weaker blowtorches based there....although its still a fairly easy catch on the Gulf coast.

As for WBZ, one of my more remarkable catches was as a teenager in 1964.  WBZ in a motel room in Flagstaff, AZ.  GE table model clock radio (tube).  Good signal...nothing faint or weak about it.
Logged

Owner of a radio receiver
radioman148
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 11749


Re: WBZ-Loud and Clear plus UNID
« Reply #27 on: August 07, 2011, 02:57:58 PM »


KCTA did pursue the idea of getting nighttime service with 1,000 watts several years back but there were some problems with the filing of the application and it was eventually dismissed.  It probably would have worked, although besides WBZ interference to Mexico City would have been a real concern.  Scroll down this page to see the pattern they had proposed: www.fccinfo.com/CMDProEngine.php?sCurrentService=AM&tabSearchType=Appl&sAppIDNumber=285382&sHours=N

Interesting pattern in that it appears a small lobe is aimed somewhat (if not directly) toward Mexico City.  IME, Mexico City's 1030 is one of the weaker blowtorches based there....although its still a fairly easy catch on the Gulf coast.

As for WBZ, one of my more remarkable catches was as a teenager in 1964.  WBZ in a motel room in Flagstaff, AZ.  GE table model clock radio (tube).  Good signal...nothing faint or weak about it.

Back in the 60s when the frequencies were really clear I caught WBZ in Seattle along with WABC, WNBC, & WCBS. Because of their directional array, WBZ had a great signal towards the west.
Logged
ddsparxx
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1723


Re: WBZ-Loud and Clear plus UNID
« Reply #28 on: August 07, 2011, 04:12:10 PM »

About the KDKA/WBZ IBOC:

In northern VA, I described it  "messy" as the IBOC jammer from WBZ is loud at night here and it often overpowers KDKA's signal. It would probably be a bit less messy in KY and probably less so in western KY. I haven't been in Kentucky for a long time and didn't listen to 1030/1020 there at night, so I'm just guessing what would be like listening there at night.
« Last Edit: August 07, 2011, 04:14:29 PM by ddsparxx » Logged
BRNout
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4558

IBOC buzz-kill


Re: WBZ-Loud and Clear plus UNID
« Reply #29 on: August 10, 2011, 10:45:58 AM »

Back in the 60s when the frequencies were really clear I caught WBZ in Seattle along with WABC, WNBC, & WCBS. Because of their directional array, WBZ had a great signal towards the west.

In February 1987, I picked up a clear signal from WBZ - under KTWO - from Park City, UT.  This was with a garden-variety Walkman in an interior room facing the atrium!!  The noise level on the band was a lot lower, even then.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.381 seconds with 19 queries.