RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 21, 2013, 08:24:05 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: WBZ-Loud and Clear plus UNID  (Read 4010 times)
jd
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3959


Re: WBZ-Loud and Clear plus UNID
« Reply #50 on: August 29, 2011, 12:30:51 PM »

WBZ still puts a big signal into Northern Illinois almost every night.

Not surprising at all, so what's the deal with WNVR Vernon Hills--do they get slammed?
Logged

Two trucks loaded with copies of Roget's Thesaurus collided in midtown Manhattan. Witnesses were stunned, startled, aghast, taken aback, shocked, rattled and awestruck.
cyberdad
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3076

Smoother, Fresher, Less Filling...That's Clear!


Re: WBZ-Loud and Clear plus UNID
« Reply #51 on: August 29, 2011, 12:51:54 PM »

Just doing a little quick math....

My travels so far have taken me to 47 states. I did some quick math and calculate that I've heard a Chicago "1-A clear" in 42 of them (plus three Canadian provinces).  At least 40...if not all 42...of the states, plus Manitoba, Ontario, and Quebec  involve WLS. 

The five states where I've been but haven't heard WLS or a Chicago clear would be Washington, Oregon, Utah, Arizona, and New Mexico.  British Columbia would also be on my list.  My guess is that with a determined effort, at least one Chicago signal would be do-able in each of these....even given today's crowded and noisy conditions.

I'll bet that the states you didn't hear WLS in were states you visited in more recent times, such as the last 20 years. In 1963 I heard all the Chicago clears in Oregon, Washington & British Columbia.
One specific & very memorable DX night for me was in Seattle in August 1963. I heard all the Chicago clears, plus lots of east coast stations.
That night I heard WNBC, WABC, & WCBS NYC, plus WCAU, WBZ, & WHAM all in Seattle on a Sunday night in August.
My only regret is I didn't have a tape recorder available.

Those conditions would've left me "sleepless in Seattle" fer sure!  

And yes, most of my Chicago catches in the west were back when things were less crowded/noisy.  Some of it, however, has to do with logistics and lack of a dedicated effort on my part.  One place where I have made a few attempts at the Chicago big boys is Burlington, WA....a handy place to spend the night about midway between Seattle and Vancouver.  Except for local pest KAPS on 660 a couple of miles up the road from my hotel, the location is a pretty good DX spot....relatively noise free.

And I don't recall the xylophone/vibraphone weather sounder or the ID on the WLS overnight show....although both vaguely ring a bell. (no pun intended!).  In the late 60s, I'd have been in college in Iowa....where after midnight I'd probably have been either spending quality time with my girlfriend, DXing, or hanging out on the high end of the dial flipping between KOMA, WLAC, and XERF (if not sleeping).  I didn't listen to WLS very much at night because we were in a convergence zone and it sounded awful.

Logged

Owner of a radio receiver
cyberdad
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3076

Smoother, Fresher, Less Filling...That's Clear!


Re: WBZ-Loud and Clear plus UNID
« Reply #52 on: August 29, 2011, 12:55:49 PM »

WBZ still puts a big signal into Northern Illinois almost every night.

Not surprising at all, so what's the deal with WNVR Vernon Hills--do they get slammed?

Where Radioman is, WNVR is probably invisible on their night pattern.  I'm about two miles from their stick, but they're not on all night.  In fact, they sign off pretty early which opens the door for what's usually a very good signal from WBZ
Logged

Owner of a radio receiver
radioman148
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 11747


Re: WBZ-Loud and Clear plus UNID
« Reply #53 on: August 29, 2011, 02:39:30 PM »

WBZ still puts a big signal into Northern Illinois almost every night.

Not surprising at all, so what's the deal with WNVR Vernon Hills--do they get slammed?

Where Radioman is, WNVR is probably invisible on their night pattern.  I'm about two miles from their stick, but they're not on all night.  In fact, they sign off pretty early which opens the door for what's usually a very good signal from WBZ

Cyberdad is right. Where I am WNVR is not usually an issue. Sometimes in the early evening I can hear it mixing with WBZ, but most often it's just WBZ.
Logged
BRNout
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4558

IBOC buzz-kill


Re: WBZ-Loud and Clear plus UNID
« Reply #54 on: August 30, 2011, 07:58:41 AM »

A bigger problem for midwest reception of WBZ is the IBOC jamming from adjacent WHO - at times it can render WBZ unlistenable. 
Logged
radioman148
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 11747


Re: WBZ-Loud and Clear plus UNID
« Reply #55 on: August 30, 2011, 08:27:25 AM »

A bigger problem for midwest reception of WBZ is the IBOC jamming from adjacent WHO - at times it can render WBZ unlistenable. 

That's true & it's hard to null WHO when listening to WBZ from the midwest.
Logged
vibe
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1249


Re: WBZ-Loud and Clear plus UNID
« Reply #56 on: August 30, 2011, 01:37:45 PM »

I have a Bose Wave Radio-not the highest of hi tech; but in the summer of 2006 or was it 2007, I had a stronger WBZ than WHO in eastern IA on night 1 and an equal WBZ and WHO in SE IA the next few nites. Off topic-that was sightseeing heaven: one could play 18H of golf w cart, eat a full blown ribeye dinner, drink 75 cent drafts at her bar AND get a room that was safe for LESS than $60.  That was the time I got KFI from just outside Richmond IA on I-70.  Is it possible that some radios are better with "blocking" IBOC or am I all wet 9from Hurricane Irene)?
I do believe I had WHO last nite here in Central Mass but was too sleepy to ID it. Gotten it numerous times when conditions to the W were favorable.  After all it was round midnight.
I tried for WBZ in western KS (near garden City) but there was a strong 1030 in the area.
Logged
radioman148
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 11747


Re: WBZ-Loud and Clear plus UNID
« Reply #57 on: August 30, 2011, 02:35:06 PM »

I have a Bose Wave Radio-not the highest of hi tech; but in the summer of 2006 or was it 2007, I had a stronger WBZ than WHO in eastern IA on night 1 and an equal WBZ and WHO in SE IA the next few nites. Off topic-that was sightseeing heaven: one could play 18H of golf w cart, eat a full blown ribeye dinner, drink 75 cent drafts at her bar AND get a room that was safe for LESS than $60.  That was the time I got KFI from just outside Richmond IA on I-70.  Is it possible that some radios are better with "blocking" IBOC or am I all wet 9from Hurricane Irene)?
I do believe I had WHO last nite here in Central Mass but was too sleepy to ID it. Gotten it numerous times when conditions to the W were favorable.  After all it was round midnight.
I tried for WBZ in western KS (near garden City) but there was a strong 1030 in the area.

You might have been in WHO's cancellation zone when you were in Eastern Iowa.
Logged
vibe
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1249


Re: WBZ-Loud and Clear plus UNID
« Reply #58 on: August 30, 2011, 05:56:04 PM »

Probably the case.
Logged
cyberdad
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3076

Smoother, Fresher, Less Filling...That's Clear!


Re: WBZ-Loud and Clear plus UNID
« Reply #59 on: August 30, 2011, 07:53:28 PM »

I went to college in Eastern Iowa, and two of my kids are University of Iowa graduates. 

Okay...I'll go off topic for a moment myself... Mt. Hamil Tap, Huffton, IA (not on most maps)...Late 60s-early 70s...Half a fried chicken, fries, slaw, AND a pitcher of PBR all for less than five bucks.  Plus live entertainment.  (Chix was $3.50...and always excellent.  Pitcher was $1.35)

Anyway, what I can report from all my experience there, is that Eastern Iowa is indeed in WHO's nighttime convergence zone. The result is WBZ usually had (and probably still has) a better nighttime signal.
Logged

Owner of a radio receiver
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.261 seconds with 19 queries.