gregg75
STOP THE PRESSES !!!
rimember
Offline
Posts: 2754
|
 |
« on: August 12, 2011, 11:10:14 PM » |
|
Would you like to see much of reality TV replaced by network movies? Here is a list of all the network movies in 1973 from wikipedia. Are they due a come back? I know we have a lot more channels and choices now, but we also have a lot more movies. I would think movies (already made) would be cheaper for the networks than reality shows. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973%E2%80%9374_United_States_network_television_scheduleSUNDAYABC MOVIE 8:30-10:30 NBC MOVIE 8:30-10:30 MONDAYNBC MOVIE 9-11PM TUESDAYABC MOVIE 8:30-10PM CBS MOVIE 9:30-11PM WEDNESDAYABC MOVIE 8:30-10PM NBC MOVIE 8:30-10PM THURSDAYCBS MOVIE 9-11PM FRIDAYCBS MOVIE 9-11PM SATURDAYABC MOVIE 8:30-10PM NBC MOVIE 9-11PM
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: August 12, 2011, 11:14:40 PM by gregg75 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TexasTom
rimember
Offline
Posts: 992
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: August 12, 2011, 11:39:32 PM » |
|
Remember that in 1973, the only way to see movies once they fell out of first run (other than the rare theatrical re-release) was to watch them when they were broadcast on TV. There were no DVDs, Blu Ray disks, prerecorded VHS tapes, pay movie channels, pay per view movies, or streaming video as alternative sources to see those movies. Except for a very small number of households with industrial grade video tape recorders at home, no one was able to record and archive broadcasts of movies for re-watching in the future.
Consequently, when a movie showed up on network TV, it was a very big deal -- and the box office blockbusters translated to huge ratings. Today, it's a very different matter...there are so many different places to see movies that there is nothing special about a movie being shown on broadcast television. And that's reflected in the ratings, which generally aren't all that good when theatrical films run on broadcast networks.
So, no, we probably aren't going to get those movie nights back...although I tend to agree that they'd be an improvement over the reality shows. But then I'd personally consider signing off for transmitter maintenance to be an improvement over most reality television.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bpatrick
rimember
Offline
Posts: 8900
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: August 13, 2011, 08:44:11 AM » |
|
And you won't see much except the occasional CBS Hallmark specials.
What was really sad was the decline and fall of the miniseries. Remember in the '70s and '80s when those things were real events that seemed to hook the entire country: "Rich Man, Poor Man," "Roots," "Holocaust," "Shogun," "The Winds Of War," "The Thorn Birds," "Lonesome Dove"? Classic television all. But there were also a fair share of forgettable ones (anyone remember "A.D."?) and a problem: if the miniseries didn't attract a large audience the first night, forget it; few people were going to join them in progress. And I don't think you could get people to commit to as much as seven or eight nights anymore (part of the reason for the success of "Roots," aside from the story, was cold and snow in the eastern half of the country that week, Jan. 23-30, 1977, but there weren't the alternatives we have now).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Lkeller
rimember
Offline
Posts: 6634
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: August 13, 2011, 09:27:53 AM » |
|
You must not be watching basic cable. Networks like FX run a fair number of theatrical films. Personally, I never watch. Why would I want to see "edited for content and time" films with commercial interruptions when I can see them in their original uncensored form without commercials - via so many other sources?
As for mini-series, they were given up by the major networks a couple of decades ago as too costly to produce. They have been replaced by many fine short series (Breaking Bad, Mad Men, etc.) on the basic cable channels.
Count me as one vote for the way TV is today, not 30 years ago.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: August 13, 2011, 09:32:56 AM by Lkeller »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SteveRichards
rimember
Offline
Posts: 345
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: August 13, 2011, 10:01:11 AM » |
|
And because of all the commercials now, a movie takes forever to watch on TV. Most movies that would have been allotted a 2-hour time slot 15 or 20 years ago now have to run 2 1/2 hours to get in all the spots. And then there is all the editing, etc. Watching a movie on TV just isn't that pleasant anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Corky Marlowe
rimember
Offline
Posts: 1331
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: August 13, 2011, 02:26:10 PM » |
|
Seems like a fair number of the timeslots in the first post were made-for TV, like the ABC Movie Of The Week, which was on Tuesday and Wednesday. Also, wasn't Sunday night NBC's Mystery Movie (Columbo, McCloud, McMillan & Wife, etc)?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
gregg75
STOP THE PRESSES !!!
rimember
Offline
Posts: 2754
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: August 13, 2011, 02:46:17 PM » |
|
Looks like they were still counting them as movies though.
THIS-TV seems to be making a lot out of the older movies and seeing as they have the most affiliates of any sub-channel, there must be an audience (although older) for them.
The networks now run an occasional SPECIAL MOVIE with some quite current. I'd think if ABC had one of those every Wednesday it could become popular again. But they'd probably have to move some reality series to make room. Everybody always wants to do what everybody else is doing. Is there no counter programming anymore?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
therealjm12
rimember
Offline
Posts: 1243
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: August 13, 2011, 06:18:47 PM » |
|
I know, back in the day, ABC was very successful with the Tuesday and Wednesday Movies of the week. They were able to attract such hungry producers as a very young Steven Spielberg, Arron Spelling David Wolper, among others. It was the start of Kolchak the Night Stalker -one of my all time favorites. It was a formula that worked and might work today but would be a gamble. Reality shows are cheaper to produce and attract pretty much brainless audiences -which work for the nets. Those movies have pretty much disappeared. I have never seen them packaged and rerun.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"We are just voices in the air, but we make radio alive". - Dr. Johnny Fever
|
|
|
searadiofreak
rimember
Offline
Posts: 1784
radio is still alive and well!
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: August 13, 2011, 07:46:09 PM » |
|
I think the point has been made we are dealing with a totally different television era back in the 60's/70's, as it applies to movies. The landscape is totally different due to technology, as has been mentioned.
However, kudos to TMC, who STILL runs movies uninterupted, and they are still on many cable systems. They have been slow to move to newer titles (and by newer I mean 80's/90's!) but I still appreciate this channel, and still appreciate cable operators that run this channel on their basic lineup.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: August 13, 2011, 07:48:00 PM by searadiofreak »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
johnnyu
rimember
Online
Posts: 414
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: August 13, 2011, 08:10:43 PM » |
|
ABC is showing Harry Potter tonight.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|