RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 24, 2013, 12:47:44 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Texar Audio Prism  (Read 1451 times)
Bill DeFelice
Computer & Broadcast Technologist
rimember

Online Online

Posts: 2476

Past engineer of WMNR-FM, WMMM/WCFS-AM, WREF, WEBE


Re: Texar Audio Prism
« Reply #10 on: August 19, 2011, 04:27:05 PM »

Thanks, Paul. I knew I was at a station that had a Phoenix but I was starting to doubt I saw what I remembered. Thanks for the clarification.
Logged

HobbyBroadcaster.net
The references for legal low-power license free broadcasting under FCC Part 15 regulations.
Legal & technical references, equipment reviews, how-to's and more!
NightAire
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 797


Re: Texar Audio Prism
« Reply #11 on: August 20, 2011, 02:51:10 AM »

Regarding the comment about the filters making it sound "very much like AM:"

It's worth mentioning that AM broadcasts (up until the digital debacle) have, for about the past 25 years, sounded truly exceptional.

The problem has been the receivers.  Manufacturers would make a $650 receiver, spend $649.51 on the FM portion, and 49 cents on the AM.

That's how you end up with AM receiver specs like Total Distortion: 3% and Response: 275 - 2800 Hz.

Most AM stations have been flat to the NRSC standard, 50 Hz to 9800 Hz, for about a quarter century.  Unfortunately, the audience has rarely heard what is being broadcast due to the horrible receivers...  yet, the FM sounds great, so it MUST be AM's problem...

If you're streaming in standard mp3 at 80 kbps or lower in stereo, as mentioned above, that 10 Khz rolloff could be a God-send.  I think you would also be shocked to hear just how crisp a response to 10 Khz really is!  (Most home cassette decks, for example, rarely produced anything over 11 Khz, and often a LOT less.)

I agree with this idea of giving it a try; I think you'll be pleasantly surprised!
Logged

The 80s Greatest Hits: http://BlackLightRadio.com
LA_Guy
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1158


Re: Texar Audio Prism
« Reply #12 on: August 23, 2011, 07:32:06 PM »

The Phoenix does have a NRSC filter. It also has a cool distortion limiting clipper. They have a VCA driving the clipper and the its compared with the input via a biased comparator/integrator.  If the clipping gets too deep, the VCA lowers its drive. There's a control that you can use to set the ultimate clip depth by varying the bias.

I ran a Prism/Phoenix in a cool way at 850 in Boston-I put a rebuilt BL40 Modulimiter in between the Prism part and the Phoenix clipper/filter (I also narrowed the bandwidth of the last three bands in the Prism, IIRC I crossed over between bands 2 and 3 at around 700 Hz and 3 and 4 at 2.5 kHz).  I put a 600 ohm resistor on the transformer output and used the unbalanced monitor output to drive the clipper/filter. We ran a mono Compellor/Aphex combination at the studio in front of the microwave STL and ran the Audio Prism part as a fast AGC. It CRANKED! My replacement put on a 9100B Optimod-which in my opinion didn't sound near as good. Last I saw it was at 1510 in Boston (on their MW-50 standby). 
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.22 seconds with 19 queries.