RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 18, 2013, 11:37:17 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The new 100.7  (Read 997 times)
Elephant
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 357


The new 100.7
« on: November 20, 2011, 11:50:01 AM »

Here's the signal.  250 watts at 699 feet.  It's almost as good at 97.3's full power signal.  What will they do with it?

http://www.radio-locator.com/cgi-bin/pat?call=W264BW&service=FX&status=C&hours=U
Logged
js
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 227


Re: The new 100.7
« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2011, 12:08:46 PM »

Is it on the air?  Here in Fairfield, I'm hearing WEEC Springfield.
Logged
Elephant
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 357


Re: The new 100.7
« Reply #2 on: November 20, 2011, 12:15:46 PM »

I don't know.  I'm too far north to be able to tell, but if you look at FCC filings, they have some interesting plans for 106.3 and 106.7 up north. 
Logged
secondchoice
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2247


Re: The new 100.7
« Reply #3 on: November 20, 2011, 12:25:12 PM »

Here's the signal.  250 watts at 699 feet.  It's almost as good at 97.3's full power signal.  What will they do with it?

http://www.radio-locator.com/cgi-bin/pat?call=W264BW&service=FX&status=C&hours=U

If CC does like they have in Atlanta, it will eventually be carrying WLW.  CC's 92.3 "Atlanta area translator" is carrying WGST.  Of course the WGST translator has better night time coverage than 640.  I live too far north and still get 92.3 WDEF Chattanooga.  IMHO WGST has the worst signal for a 50KW with a good low dial position station.  WLW covers this signal so why it is tied to WEBN I do not know.
Logged
js
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 227


Re: The new 100.7
« Reply #4 on: November 20, 2011, 12:30:28 PM »

Are they taking over the Air-1 repeater @ 106.3?  I heard it was on the old 96 Rock tower.  It looks like that's the location.

http://radio-locator.com/info/W292DT-FX
« Last Edit: November 20, 2011, 12:35:33 PM by js » Logged
Elephant
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 357


Re: The new 100.7
« Reply #5 on: November 20, 2011, 12:36:47 PM »

The difference is, WGST has a terrible nighttime signal.  WLW doesn't need any help.  I suspect this will be a music format and it will probably be simulcast on one of, or both of the 106.3/106.7 translators to cover the north side of the market.
Logged
Elephant
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 357


Re: The new 100.7
« Reply #6 on: November 20, 2011, 04:01:50 PM »

And here's the proposed contour for 106.3.  Add the two signals and you got a pretty decent coverage.

http://maps.google.com/?q=http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/contourplot.kml?gmap=2%26appid=1450287%26call=W292DT%26freq=106.3%26contour=60%26city=AUBURN%26state=OH
Logged
ncincy1
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 215


Re: The new 100.7
« Reply #7 on: November 20, 2011, 05:38:08 PM »

From Radio Insight's Translator Report - November 6 edtion:

"The co-op moves of EMF Broadcasting and Clear Channel take us this time to the Cincinnati area. 106.3 W292CO Middletown, OH has applied to move to 106.7 where it will jump from 55 watts to 100, while rebroadcasting an HD subchannel of 107.1 WKFS. The move of the former will allow 106.3 W292DT Auburn, OH to jump from 10 to 250 watts rebroadcasting 102.7 WEBN-HD2. WEBN-HD2 is also due to be the parent station for 100.7 W264BW Norwood, OH."

So, it looks like they will be broadcasting WEBN-HD2 on these signals covering the metro (I-275 loop). Hmmm?
Logged
ncincy1
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 215


Re: The new 100.7
« Reply #8 on: November 20, 2011, 05:42:39 PM »

On a somewhat related note, no takers (yet) for the WNKU translator on 94.5 covering the north metro. Still would be nice if WDJO am would take it.  Grin
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.265 seconds with 20 queries.