RadioDiscussions.com

 
Login June 19, 2013, 09:06:19 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: KXOK VS KDWB 1960'S  (Read 1259 times)
JohnnyOhJohnny
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 211


KXOK VS KDWB 1960'S
« on: December 08, 2011, 10:58:49 PM »

Does anyone remember getting KXOK in the twin cities when KDWB went off the air? or Vice Versa?  Huh
Logged
cyberdad
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3109

Smoother, Fresher, Less Filling...That's Clear!


Re: KXOK VS KDWB 1960'S
« Reply #1 on: December 09, 2011, 12:04:49 PM »

Nope.....

When I started going to the Twin Cities on a regular basis for business in the 80s, KDWB was an oldies station with a lousy nighttime signal.  I don't remember offhand if the St. Louis station had switched calls by then or not, but when KDWB was off....or more correctly went silent...CKRC from Winnipeg was normally top dog.  Of course, CKRC has also been silent itself for at least a dozen years or so.

When I was in College in southeast Iowa in the late 60s, KXOK was a rather popular daytime listen, but disappeared completely when they went to their nighttime pattern.   I mention this because the school was located on a direct line between St. Louis and St. Paul.  (And indeed is now on the "Avenue of the Saints" highway).
Logged

Owner of a radio receiver
vibe
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1249


Re: KXOK VS KDWB 1960'S
« Reply #2 on: December 09, 2011, 03:36:56 PM »

I stayed at the Avenue of the Saints motel in Donellson IA (2008?).  Small town, quiet, good AM spot to DX because of lack of external noise. 
Cool town- pop. 1000 or so w/ a 9H golf course-18H w/ cart $15.  12 oz rib eye, salad, potato 6.95, and stock car racing on Sat nites.  But a good spot to explore nearby Ft. Madison, Keokuk, Nauvoo and other places. 
So I'm off topic-the place was really nice, clean, and $30 or so.  And the ground conductivity was something else as the room backed up to a cornfield.
Logged
cyberdad
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3109

Smoother, Fresher, Less Filling...That's Clear!


Re: KXOK VS KDWB 1960'S
« Reply #3 on: December 09, 2011, 07:29:23 PM »

Ahh....Donellson, IA.... 

About 15 miles from where I went to school.  Once went out with a girl from there. 

But my favorite memory was being in my roommate's car and getting stopped by the local cop (apparently a close relative of Barney Fife) after a standard Friday night beer drinking episode.  While my roomate was busy successfully talking his way out of a ticket, three of us were standing behind the 1959 Ford squad car (this was now 1969). After we discretely finished relieving ourselves behind the rear bumper, we noticed that most of the lights etc. on the car were simply glued onto the vehicle.  Not hooked up to anything!  Bogus...purely for effect!

There's more to the story, but far be it from me to veer off topic.
Logged

Owner of a radio receiver
radioman148
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 11779


Re: KXOK VS KDWB 1960'S
« Reply #4 on: December 09, 2011, 09:40:57 PM »

Speaking of KXOK, I used to be able to hear it in the Northern Chicago suburbs sometimes during the day in the 60s. If I positioned the radio one way I heard KXOK, if I moved it the other way CFCO.
Anyway KXOK was a great Top 40 station back then. At night their directional pattern made it impossible for me to hear around Chicago, but it came in
like a local in New Orleans when I visited family there.
Logged
Schroedingers Cat
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 965


Re: KXOK VS KDWB 1960'S
« Reply #5 on: December 09, 2011, 09:44:12 PM »

When KDWB (or whatever the call letters are on 630 this week), and apparently CKRC, went silent or became daytime only, it allowed CFCO Chatham, ON to upgrade to 6 kW night using five of their existing towers.  The pattern maximum to the NW is equivalent to about 30 kW based on Class B minimum efficiency.  If they had built a new antenna array, they might have been able to run even more power, but you may notice that CFCO comes in a good percentage of the time at night now.
Logged
radioman148
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 11779


Re: KXOK VS KDWB 1960'S
« Reply #6 on: December 09, 2011, 11:48:17 PM »

When KDWB (or whatever the call letters are on 630 this week), and apparently CKRC, went silent or became daytime only, it allowed CFCO Chatham, ON to upgrade to 6 kW night using five of their existing towers.  The pattern maximum to the NW is equivalent to about 30 kW based on Class B minimum efficiency.  If they had built a new antenna array, they might have been able to run even more power, but you may notice that CFCO comes in a good percentage of the time at night now.

CFCO comes into the northern burbs of Chicago during the day. A nice haul from Chatham, Ontario.
Logged
Steve Green NEPA
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 636


Re: KXOK VS KDWB 1960'S
« Reply #7 on: December 10, 2011, 07:03:32 AM »



From the Laurelton Queens (NYC) area,    it was WPRO Providence in the day with a little WEJL Scranton if you nulled WPRO and caught a break from the searing violins of WVNJ 620.

But on those swell overnights when a lot of stations were off dial-wide,  KXOK could be pretty listenable.     Never did log KDWB,  though.
Logged
cyberdad
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3109

Smoother, Fresher, Less Filling...That's Clear!


Re: KXOK VS KDWB 1960'S
« Reply #8 on: December 10, 2011, 03:46:28 PM »

KDWB's 500-watt nighttime pattern was very directional and narrow to the west.  I never heard it here in the Chicago area....or in Iowa.  In fact, during the late '80s, when I'd visit a customer of mine in Lakeville, MN....about 20 miles south of downtown Minneapolis...I'd get splatter in the car radio from WOI in Ames, IA.  Even at 5kw, the daytime signal was also directional and not that great.  The fact that the ground conductivity immediately around the Twin Cities is generally pretty lousy didn't help matters.

As for CFCO, when I was in Northern Minnesota and in Winnipeg a couple of months ago, it was roaring in each night.  I was a little surprised, but the equivalent of 30kw aimed at me would certainly explain things!
Logged

Owner of a radio receiver
cyberdad
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3109

Smoother, Fresher, Less Filling...That's Clear!


Re: KXOK VS KDWB 1960'S
« Reply #9 on: December 10, 2011, 04:00:27 PM »


CFCO comes into the northern burbs of Chicago during the day. A nice haul from Chatham, Ontario.

As you know, I'm about 25-30 miles west of you, and I've never heard them during the day except once in a while right after sunrise.  If anything, during the day here, I'll sometimes get snatches of KJSL....but even that's less frequent now that was the case as KXOK. 

I've driven by CFCO's array many times.  It's clearly visible about a mile or two north of the 401 freeway which connects Detroit-Windsor with Toronto.  Tall towers planted in level farm country ground with what I'd presume to be excellent conductivity.  No buildings, development, or anything similar nearby to obstruct or degrade the signal.
Logged

Owner of a radio receiver
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.202 seconds with 20 queries.