RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 22, 2013, 07:28:49 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: KXOK VS KDWB 1960'S  (Read 1220 times)
radioman148
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 11750


Re: KXOK VS KDWB 1960'S
« Reply #10 on: December 11, 2011, 12:04:30 AM »



From the Laurelton Queens (NYC) area,    it was WPRO Providence in the day with a little WEJL Scranton if you nulled WPRO and caught a break from the searing violins of WVNJ 620.

But on those swell overnights when a lot of stations were off dial-wide,  KXOK could be pretty listenable.     Never did log KDWB,  though.

I'm impressed. I never knew KXOK could make it to NYC.
Logged
radioman148
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 11750


Re: KXOK VS KDWB 1960'S
« Reply #11 on: December 11, 2011, 12:06:48 AM »


CFCO comes into the northern burbs of Chicago during the day. A nice haul from Chatham, Ontario.

As you know, I'm about 25-30 miles west of you, and I've never heard them during the day except once in a while right after sunrise.  If anything, during the day here, I'll sometimes get snatches of KJSL....but even that's less frequent now that was the case as KXOK. 

I've driven by CFCO's array many times.  It's clearly visible about a mile or two north of the 401 freeway which connects Detroit-Windsor with Toronto.  Tall towers planted in level farm country ground with what I'd presume to be excellent conductivity.  No buildings, development, or anything similar nearby to obstruct or degrade the signal.

I'll have to check again soon. I know that as of a few years ago I could still hear CFCO during the day--weak but it was there.
Logged
Schroedingers Cat
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 942


Re: KXOK VS KDWB 1960'S
« Reply #12 on: December 11, 2011, 12:31:05 AM »

A few years ago, for one year, CFCO had an affiliation agreement to air the Detroit Tigers PBP.  With just 10 kW day, and a 6 kW night signal pattern that exceeds the day signal in many parts of Metro Detroit, the signal far exceeded the signal of originating station 50 kW WXYT in many areas.  I don't know if it was the embarassment, the competition, or both, but the agreement ended after one year.  Since WXYT simulcasted and then exclusively moved to FM 97.1, the point is moot. I believe they still simulcast Detroit Tiger Baseball on 1270.

CFCO has a great signal.  The day pattern has a huge major lobe to the west.  Parallelogram patterns (this pattern uses a fifth tower in addtion) can be inflexible, though, and a null which appears to be unneccessary reduces radiation to the NW.  The night pattern however is at maximum in this direction.  When I was last near Chicago before IBOC hiss from WTMJ, I could hear CFCO day and night by just tuning in a car radio near Old Orchard.
« Last Edit: December 11, 2011, 12:32:45 AM by Schroedingers Cat » Logged
cyberdad
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3082

Smoother, Fresher, Less Filling...That's Clear!


Re: KXOK VS KDWB 1960'S
« Reply #13 on: December 11, 2011, 07:58:12 PM »

CFCO used to put a respectable nighttime signal into the Detroit area even back when they were 1kw.  Definitely not competitive with the local signals, but still listenable.

I don't doubt at all that CFCO is doable daytime in the Chicago area.  I've just never been able to snag it myself.  I may be just a little too far west, but I'll probably give it another try.
Logged

Owner of a radio receiver
Scott Fybush
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4285


Re: KXOK VS KDWB 1960'S
« Reply #14 on: December 11, 2011, 07:59:49 PM »

CFCO is one of just two AM signals that are consistently listenable, day and night, both at my home in suburban Rochester NY and at my in-laws' place in Fort Wayne, Indiana, 500 miles west of here. (The other is WJR.)
Logged

All kinds of good stuff over at http://www.fybush.com
cyberdad
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3082

Smoother, Fresher, Less Filling...That's Clear!


Re: KXOK VS KDWB 1960'S
« Reply #15 on: December 11, 2011, 08:10:59 PM »

Interesting stuff, Scott.  And impressive coverage.  Assuming CFCO is audible daytime in the Chicago area, then they'd be the only Detroit area signal audible here other than WJR.  (Although CKLW might also make that list for someone with a really good radio).

Anyway....a quickie question for you as the "tower guy"....

In my post the other day, I mentioned that I've driven by their array many times and that the CFCO sticks are clearly visible from the 401 freeway....a couple of miles away.  As I said, the towers are tall.  Then after my post, I was actually thinking of posting again specifically to ask you if you knew anything about these....are they quarter wave, half wave or whatever.  I'm not particularly knowledgeable about a.m. radio tower heights and the physics involved.
Logged

Owner of a radio receiver
Scott Fybush
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4285


Re: KXOK VS KDWB 1960'S
« Reply #16 on: December 11, 2011, 09:08:59 PM »

If the data reported to the FCC is accurate (and that's not always a given with Canadian stations), CFCO's towers aren't especially high - four of them are 76 degrees and a fifth is 85 degrees, just short of a quarter-wavelength.

But that's hardly unusual for a station at 630 on the dial, where a full wavelength is about 475 meters. A quarter-wave tower on 630 would be just under 400 feet tall.
Logged

All kinds of good stuff over at http://www.fybush.com
Schroedingers Cat
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 942


Re: KXOK VS KDWB 1960'S
« Reply #17 on: December 11, 2011, 10:31:54 PM »

Before WBBM was IBOC, I heard WSGW 790 Saginaw in the daytime near Union Grove, WI.  And people along Lake Shore Drive have reported places where WBBM was nulled and WSGW reinforced by tall buildings, at least before IBOC.  It seems like CHYR 710 could have been heard before they moved to FM.  Someone here reported that WCAR 1130 was heard days in Chicago before WISN moved to 1130.  I seem to remember CKLW 800 coming in a little in the daytime.  WKAR 870 East Lansing also came in near Chicago.
Logged
radioman148
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 11750


Re: KXOK VS KDWB 1960'S
« Reply #18 on: December 11, 2011, 10:49:42 PM »

Before WBBM was IBOC, I heard WSGW 790 Saginaw in the daytime near Union Grove, WI.  And people along Lake Shore Drive have reported places where WBBM was nulled and WSGW reinforced by tall buildings, at least before IBOC.  It seems like CHYR 710 could have been heard before they moved to FM.  Someone here reported that WCAR 1130 was heard days in Chicago before WISN moved to 1130.  I seem to remember CKLW 800 coming in a little in the daytime.  WKAR 870 East Lansing also came in near Chicago.


You are right about WCAR. I used to hear it in the Chicago area during the day before WISN moved to 1130. Also heard CKLW during the day & still hear East Lansing's 870 in the daytime.
Logged
Icangelp
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 858


Re: KXOK VS KDWB 1960'S
« Reply #19 on: December 12, 2011, 08:47:48 AM »

Before WBBM was IBOC, I heard WSGW 790 Saginaw in the daytime near Union Grove, WI.  And people along Lake Shore Drive have reported places where WBBM was nulled and WSGW reinforced by tall buildings, at least before IBOC.  It seems like CHYR 710 could have been heard before they moved to FM.  Someone here reported that WCAR 1130 was heard days in Chicago before WISN moved to 1130.  I seem to remember CKLW 800 coming in a little in the daytime.  WKAR 870 East Lansing also came in near Chicago.

S C. Was CHYR the station that, at one time, operated on separate frequencies for day and night?
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.442 seconds with 20 queries.