RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 24, 2013, 02:20:58 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: AM rebound!  (Read 1222 times)
JonEllis
Guest
AM rebound!
« on: November 22, 2005, 11:25:29 PM »

I see KFAN tied for 10th in Arbitron's summer book, and has moved up to #9 in the first month of the fall book.  When was the last time the Twin Cities had three stations in the top 10 12+?  I've been following the ratings for about 15 years and I can't recall a time where there have been 3 in the top 10.  (And IIRC, there was only one in the early `90s - WCCO - before KSTP's talk format really took off.)

Also, interesting to note that 630, 950, and 1280 have all returned to the 12+ ratings in recent years.  There was a long period where only 830, 1130, 1400/1470, and 1500 showed up.

AM ain't dead!
Logged
wkbam1690
Guest
Re: AM rebound!
« Reply #1 on: November 23, 2005, 01:54:55 PM »

> I see KFAN tied for 10th in Arbitron's summer book, and has
> moved up to #9 in the first month of the fall book.  When
> was the last time the Twin Cities had three stations in the
> top 10 12+?  I've been following the ratings for about 15
> years and I can't recall a time where there have been 3 in
> the top 10.  (And IIRC, there was only one in the early `90s
> - WCCO - before KSTP's talk format really took off.)
>
> Also, interesting to note that 630, 950, and 1280 have all
> returned to the 12+ ratings in recent years.  There was a
> long period where only 830, 1130, 1400/1470, and 1500 showed
> up.
>
> AM ain't dead!
>
All that IBOC hash must really be drawing the listeners...
Logged
neutral_observer
Guest
Re: AM rebound!
« Reply #2 on: November 28, 2005, 10:15:00 PM »

> When was the last time the Twin Cities had three stations in the
> top 10 12+?  


Never....there have always been ten stations in the top 10!   Wink
Logged
Northpine
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 31


Re: AM rebound!
« Reply #3 on: November 10, 2006, 04:20:07 PM »

Apparently that's true .. it isn't. A good example is up in Fargo. Two brand new AM stations are getting ready to take to the air - KKAG (740) and WZFN (1100). And the best part is that both are 50,000 watt furnaces with huge signals.

It does seem true...AM is still alive and well  Grin
Logged
MN Maniac
Guest
Re: AM rebound!
« Reply #4 on: November 11, 2006, 09:50:33 AM »

Apparently that's true .. it isn't. A good example is up in Fargo. Two brand new AM stations are getting ready to take to the air - KKAG (740) and WZFN (1100). And the best part is that both are 50,000 watt furnaces with huge signals.

It does seem true...AM is still alive and well  Grin


AM would be even stronger if the weaker stations were removed from the band.  You know, the ones that serve no useful purpose.  Low power, shoehorned directional signals which only simulcast the FM and cause interference to other co-channel or adjacent channel stations.

This is what the expanded band was *supposed* to be about.  The idea was to remove the biggest interference-makers and relocate them above 1600Khz.  Unfortunately, it now looks like the FCC will allow the "old" allocations to remain active or to be reactivated, if now dark.  Witness the resurrection of 1550 in Cassleton.  This was KQWB's original frequency, vacated when they moved to 1660.  It should stay that way.

Logged
pbf1
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1499


Actually...
« Reply #5 on: November 12, 2006, 02:38:37 PM »

Never....there have always been <i>ten</i> stations in the top 10!   Wink


Actually, there have not always been 10 stations in the top 10.  Once upon a time, there weren't 10 stations!    hehehe
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.229 seconds with 19 queries.