RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 25, 2013, 02:56:39 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: KOKC Automation  (Read 2102 times)
frequency_modulation
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 19


KOKC Automation
« on: December 22, 2011, 08:07:20 PM »

Is there anyone on this board from KOKC?  I really have tried to continue to be a listener (yes, I do like some of the syndicated talk shows), but it seems like the station isn't even listened to by the staff.  Programs keep getting switched up half an hour in, multiple commercials playing simultaneously, it is almost like they are trying to push me away.  Does it cost that much to have just one person sit in the studio in the evening and listen to the broadcast to make sure the correct item is playing?

Of course there are other options.  I can listen to the programs online if I am not in my car or somewhere else away from a computer.  Or I can listen to another station altogether.  Either way, it is one more set of ears not hearing your local advertisers, although local advertising is pretty thin on KOKC anyway, so it may not even matter.

I have to ask, why even bother with keeping the station on the air at all?
« Last Edit: December 22, 2011, 08:16:43 PM by frequency_modulation » Logged
OKCRadioGuy
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3016


Re: KOKC Automation
« Reply #1 on: January 01, 2012, 04:30:06 PM »

?Is there anyone on this board from KOKC?" 
Rarely from what I hear.

"I really have tried to continue to be a listener (yes, I do like some of the syndicated talk shows), but it seems like the station isn't even listened to by the staff."

I think you're right.  The people at their music stations aren't interested in that format for the most part and 1520 doesn't have but a couple people on it's payroll.  Even those guys probably aren't listening all that much.  "Programs keep getting switched up half an hour in, multiple commercials playing simultaneously, it is almost like they are trying to push me away."  Can you say horrible automation and no one single dedicated person to correct the way things run?  To really get an automated station running right you really need one dedicated (VERY DEDICATED) guy or gal to spend a ton of time getting timing and closures working 100 percent right.  I've seen it done, but it requires a full time person.  "Does it cost that much to have just one person sit in the studio in the evening and listen to the broadcast to make sure the correct item is playing?"  To pay someone to sit there 24/7, it does start to add up.  Would it add up to, lets say, the cost of doing HD radio then not liking the results and turning off the sytem?  Not even close.  It's all about precieved priorities and finacing though.  Common sense can be clouded at times in larger broadcasting groups.

"Of course there are other options."  That's true.  1000 comes to mind.  I hear they make a nice showing many times in the upper part of the ratings heap unlike the station further up the dial you are discussing that has 10 times the power output.  "I can listen to the programs online if I am not in my car or somewhere else away from a computer.  Or I can listen to another station altogether.  Either way, it is one more set of ears not hearing your local advertisers, although local advertising is pretty thin on KOKC anyway, so it may not even matter."  In this day and time good automation with a few souls that are dedicated to making it run correctly can make a station like 1520 sound better than a station manned by a person.  1520 certainly doesn't sound that way.  Even when there was a fleet of board ops there, it had some rough spots in it.  A lot of it comes back to a poor quality automation system that is well past it's prime, and when it was in it's prime is sucked too.  I wouldn't wish Computer Concepts junk on anyone.

"I have to ask, why even bother with keeping the station on the air at all?"  I think the real question is why, when something clearly is a failure, changes aren't made to take the station in a totally different direction.  Many changes were made under the station's former program director (in the news-talk format) which futher ruined the station.  That's really not the change I'm talking about.  The change I speak of is totally flushing the format and doing something else with it.  Many opportunites over the years have been lost on what 1520 COULD have done and had success.  Before all the other Spanish-language stations came online in the city, 1520 should have taken that opportunity.  Next, when it was clear 92.5 would have to modernize due to demographics required for a full-power 100kw FM station, the older demo should have been served on the AM.  At the time part-timers in the building could have done a lot of voice tracking and smoke and mirrors to make that work economically and work great.  There was fear of erroding 92.5 though.  Now there's 99.7.  Game over on going with oldies on 1520.  What's left?  That's a damn good question really.   If that station was mine, I'd consider finding someone who actually cared about it enough to rent it to them.  I feel someone could do sports or some other format on that stick that would be meaningful and useful.  There are several smaller operators out there that could actually use a better signal.  But, instead we have automated garbage that barely even plays out right.  Oh well.  If a guy wants to buy a brand new hotrod and fail to change the oil in it, I guess it's his right to ruin it.  It's still enough to make a guy sick watching him do it though. Sad

Logged
ionosphere
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 428


Re: KOKC Automation
« Reply #2 on: January 03, 2012, 10:46:29 AM »

I think oldies could work at 1520. They could re-launch with their 1988 format of 50's-60's oldies. FM only really plays post-1965 stuff from what I hear.
Logged
OKCRadioGuy
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3016


Re: KOKC Automation
« Reply #3 on: January 03, 2012, 11:19:44 AM »

Even Scott Shannon's format (with the exception of his Sunday night show) isn't a 50-60s oldies format.  It does make a guy wonder why it's not done.  The demo is anchient, but isn't talk radio's audience pretty old too?
Logged
NightAire
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 797


Re: KOKC Automation
« Reply #4 on: January 04, 2012, 02:23:48 AM »

Quote
The demo is ancient, but isn't talk radio's audience pretty old too?

It is...  that's why talk is going to FM, thinking if they change bands they can lower the average age of their listener.  Results have been minimal, from what I've heard.

Sports talk looks like they could be a rough row to plow considering AM 640 and FM 98.1...  the AM is nicely complimented by 1550 in Sapulpa I'm betting, and that FM signal looks REALLY nice for the OKC area.

Looks like there are already multiple Spanish-language stations, too...  so that's out.

Standards are about the only format that it looks like isn't already covered in OKC...  and that audience is a worse demo than talk OR early oldies.

I suppose they could go to a 24/7 news feed, simulcasting CNN or something...  I'm not aware of anybody ever making much noise doing that, though.

"Dollar a hollar" infomercials are about the only thing I can think of that would be guaranteed to be a money-maker.  Anything else seems pretty high-risk....

...It's a shame, though, when a signal like that can't be used to win in the market...   Sad
Logged

The 80s Greatest Hits: http://BlackLightRadio.com
ionosphere
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 428


Re: KOKC Automation
« Reply #5 on: January 04, 2012, 03:45:04 PM »

Quote
The demo is ancient, but isn't talk radio's audience pretty old too?

Sports talk looks like they could be a rough row to plow considering AM 640 and FM 98.1...  the AM is nicely complimented by 1550 in Sapulpa I'm betting, and that FM signal looks REALLY nice for the OKC area.


Talk about a saturated market. Including 98.1 and 640, the OKC metro is serviced by a total of 4 sports talk stations. Jox 930 couldn't even make it...and it was a sister of The Sports Animal.
Logged
BobbyTbone
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 22


Re: KOKC Automation
« Reply #6 on: January 05, 2012, 03:50:20 AM »

Standards are about the only format that it looks like isn't already covered in OKC...  and that audience is a worse demo than talk OR early oldies.

Actually, the old American songbook (standards) is in Oklahoma City at 105.3 The Martini.
http://www.facebook.com/1053themartini

Logged
billyg
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1608


Re: KOKC Automation
« Reply #7 on: January 06, 2012, 05:51:32 AM »

I said this before, shows like Ingram and Savage do well in other markets, but dont seem to get much of an audience in OKC. I'd love to see 50's and mostly 60's oldies on the big 1520 too.
« Last Edit: January 06, 2012, 05:56:41 AM by billyg » Logged

Billy G.
60's Jangle Radio on Live365.com
http://www.live365.com/stations/bgspradlin4
OKCRadioGuy
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3016


Re: KOKC Automation
« Reply #8 on: January 06, 2012, 12:59:00 PM »

Billy, I two big factors figure into why 1520 hasn't been able to realize more ratings with Ingram and Savage.  First, our average drive time in our cars here is pretty short.  That doesn't keep people listening all that long so it hurts talk formats.  Being that 1520 is AM, in-home or business listening is harder.  Secondly, there's not a large news staff to fill in between the talk product.  It's hit-or-miss for them to cover breaking news due to lack of having someone to cover it.  If it is covered it's someone else really out on the streets and their read of it, etc.  There's plenty of reasons to dial around and try to find out what is going on the city because you're not getting the entire package at 1520.  There is also no good local morning show talk host or afternoon local talk show host to build on.  1520 is ran on the cheap which results in lower output. It's sort of like the laws of physics.  Plenty of people try to defy them, but few are able to sucessfully.  Bypassing costs translates to bypassing listeners which of course means revenue won't follow.  That's where 1520 is.
Logged
billyg
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1608


Re: KOKC Automation
« Reply #9 on: January 06, 2012, 04:39:55 PM »

Billy, I two big factors figure into why 1520 hasn't been able to realize more ratings with Ingram and Savage.  First, our average drive time in our cars here is pretty short.  That doesn't keep people listening all that long so it hurts talk formats.  Being that 1520 is AM, in-home or business listening is harder.  Secondly, there's not a large news staff to fill in between the talk product.  It's hit-or-miss for them to cover breaking news due to lack of having someone to cover it.  If it is covered it's someone else really out on the streets and their read of it, etc.  There's plenty of reasons to dial around and try to find out what is going on the city because you're not getting the entire package at 1520.  There is also no good local morning show talk host or afternoon local talk show host to build on.  1520 is ran on the cheap which results in lower output. It's sort of like the laws of physics.  Plenty of people try to defy them, but few are able to sucessfully.  Bypassing costs translates to bypassing listeners which of course means revenue won't follow.  That's where 1520 is.

True, about the "Entire Package". There are holes that KTOK has that 1520 can fill.  They could become the KRLD of OKC with lots of emphasis on local news, traffic and weather info. But it takes a lot of cash to run and promote that kind of station.

as long as Renda continues to run 1520 on the cheap with a small staff, low budget, no promotion, and a hodgepodge schedule of second-third string talkers they'll never be a serious contender.

« Last Edit: January 06, 2012, 04:46:55 PM by billyg » Logged

Billy G.
60's Jangle Radio on Live365.com
http://www.live365.com/stations/bgspradlin4
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.252 seconds with 20 queries.