RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 23, 2013, 07:58:05 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Dr. Bill Wattenburg  (Read 2812 times)
Radioisbest
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 13


Re: Dr. Bill Wattenburg
« Reply #10 on: January 17, 2012, 12:51:17 AM »

Hilly Rose once said that Dr. Wattenburg was the smartest man in the world, and he spoke over the heads of the Western United States!

Funny how you remember things like that!
Logged
MC
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1018


Re: Dr. Bill Wattenburg
« Reply #11 on: January 17, 2012, 06:38:10 AM »

I used to bet on what time Watenberg would blow a gasket.   I think they need to promote the new line-up more at 910.
Logged
Phedeks
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 71


Re: Dr. Bill Wattenburg
« Reply #12 on: January 17, 2012, 02:09:13 PM »

I don't know how or why anybody would listen to this condescending nut job. He belittles his callers and thinks he's GOD, if they even question him.  His stance on global warming sets him into a rage when somebody mentions it. Most intelligent people can disagree without resorting to personal attacks and insults, unlike this blowhard. 
Logged
radio dx
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 379


Re: Dr. Bill Wattenburg
« Reply #13 on: January 17, 2012, 07:34:07 PM »

I don't know how or why anybody would listen to this condescending nut job. He belittles his callers and thinks he's GOD, if they even question him.  His stance on global warming sets him into a rage when somebody mentions it. Most intelligent people can disagree without resorting to personal attacks and insults, unlike this blowhard. 

It's pure entertainment
Logged
HCochet
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 147


Re: Dr. Bill Wattenburg
« Reply #14 on: January 18, 2012, 02:02:44 AM »

I don't know how or why anybody would listen to this condescending nut job. He belittles his callers and thinks he's GOD, if they even question him.  His stance on global warming sets him into a rage when somebody mentions it. Most intelligent people can disagree without resorting to personal attacks and insults, unlike this blowhard. 
I always liked his show. Sometimes he talked about the same thing too much. Tongass National Forrest in the late 80s (early 90s?) (Japan had a contract to buy logs at $1.00 per tree!). I'm on his side on nukes and global warming. We're not at fault for it. The Earth has had ice ages and warming periods off and on for millions of years. I don't agree with him on everything, but I miss his show on KGO. If/when he spoke about the same thing too much, he always did say his show was open. That you could call and talk about something else.
Logged
MC
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1018


Re: Dr. Bill Wattenburg
« Reply #15 on: January 18, 2012, 07:12:07 AM »

I called in once and said that they should tear-up on lane of all freeways for a mountain bike lane to save energy.  You could hear his veins in his neck getting larger over the air.

 Politically, he does not fit in the typical talk radio box.  You never know who he will back,  He backed Clinton and harry Reid for example, so at least he is not of the Dems bad, Repubs good talk radio mindset.
Logged
HCochet
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 147


Re: Dr. Bill Wattenburg
« Reply #16 on: January 18, 2012, 09:47:53 PM »

I called in once and said that they should tear-up on lane of all freeways for a mountain bike lane to save energy.  You could hear his veins in his neck getting larger over the air.

 Politically, he does not fit in the typical talk radio box.  You never know who he will back,  He backed Clinton and harry Reid for example, so at least he is not of the Dems bad, Repubs good talk radio mindset.
I think bicycles should be allowed in the emergency lane on any highway. I don't know what's special about mountain bikes. I have a Schwinn Le Tour from the 70s.
I remember one time when Bill talked about car pool lanes. He's against them. I dislike the rules of carpool lanes. A parent and a child should not be considered a car pool. I say it should be two licensed drivers. Also, no car is special enough to allow just one driver. A hybrid with one driver is still just a car with one person. I don't see how that takes cars off the road. It doesn't reduce traffic. I wish I had enough money to buy a Prius and put a 427 sideoiler in it with dual quads. Then I'd drive in in the carpool lane alone.
Logged
Lkeller
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 6640


Re: Dr. Bill Wattenburg
« Reply #17 on: January 19, 2012, 09:31:03 AM »

I called in once and said that they should tear-up on lane of all freeways for a mountain bike lane to save energy.  You could hear his veins in his neck getting larger over the air.

 Politically, he does not fit in the typical talk radio box.  You never know who he will back,  He backed Clinton and harry Reid for example, so at least he is not of the Dems bad, Repubs good talk radio mindset.
I think bicycles should be allowed in the emergency lane on any highway. I don't know what's special about mountain bikes. I have a Schwinn Le Tour from the 70s.
I remember one time when Bill talked about car pool lanes. He's against them. I dislike the rules of carpool lanes. A parent and a child should not be considered a car pool. I say it should be two licensed drivers. Also, no car is special enough to allow just one driver. A hybrid with one driver is still just a car with one person. I don't see how that takes cars off the road. It doesn't reduce traffic. I wish I had enough money to buy a Prius and put a 427 sideoiler in it with dual quads. Then I'd drive in in the carpool lane alone.

Gathering from the number of single occupant cars I see that get away with using the car pool lanes on Bay Area freeways, I'd say that requiring all bodies in the car to be licensed drivers would be almost impossible to police.  There aren't enough CHP officers to go around - that's why people evade the speed limit more flagrantly than they used to - it's very unlikely you'll get caught. 

You could - in theory - place surveillance cameras at regular intervals to catch the single occupant cars (send them a ticket in the mail), but it would be hard to differentiate the bodies in the cars between young and old, unless you're only talking about toddlers in car seats. And cameras would outrage the public - much as the citizens of Phoenix were outraged when  cameras were used on the freeways there to catch speeders. Employees of the surveillance company received death threats, there were a few incidents of violence, and all the local politicians abandoned the idea as unpopular.
Logged
MC
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1018


Re: Dr. Bill Wattenburg
« Reply #18 on: January 19, 2012, 10:40:59 PM »

There was a guy maning a photo radar car in Phoenix who was killed.

I just like jerking Watenberg's chain once and a while, and his tirades make for good ratings I suppose.

In some ways, cars and commuting and traffic are very important to radio.  Understanding the comute in a given area might be a good way to program  drive time programming.  I would love  to take the train to work and save my car for recreational uses. 
Logged
nitnitr
Bob
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 154


Re: Dr. Bill Wattenburg
« Reply #19 on: January 20, 2012, 11:29:04 PM »

Wattenburg is controversial, but still fun to listen to, and that is what talk radio is about.

Whatever station he is on in SF, he'll get some audience, and maybe a decent chunk to boot.

As for bikes on the freeway, more power to you, but hope you have some life insurance for your loved ones. You get hit at 65, or whatever, by any car, on the freeway, say hello to God upon your exit of this earth.
Logged

Lead Me To The Rock Radio
Today's Christian Music
http://www.leadmetotherock.com
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.32 seconds with 21 queries.