RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 24, 2013, 06:47:51 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Who Decided WJBK Detroit Should Be The Canadian Satellite Fox Affiliate?  (Read 6668 times)
Scott Fybush
rimember

Online Online

Posts: 4293


Re: Who Decided WJBK Detroit Should Be The Canadian Satellite Fox Affiliate?
« Reply #10 on: January 24, 2012, 11:18:32 AM »

The Boston stations are indeed uplinked to satellite. The uplink is in Needham, next to the WBZ-TV tower, and I believe it's maintained by WGBH, though it's paid for by Cancom or whatever has succeeded it.
Logged

All kinds of good stuff over at http://www.fybush.com
kc1ih
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 376


Re: Who Decided WJBK Detroit Should Be The Canadian Satellite Fox Affiliate?
« Reply #11 on: January 25, 2012, 12:01:10 AM »

The Boston and Seattle network affiliates are available in Canada to anyone with Bell TV (formerly ExpressVU).
Logged

Larry
Lake Wobegone, NH
chrish
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 569


Re: Who Decided WJBK Detroit Should Be The Canadian Satellite Fox Affiliate?
« Reply #12 on: January 25, 2012, 02:00:08 AM »

There is a very strong relationship between the people living in Quebec, Ontario and especially the Maritimes have with New Englanders, many have emigrated back and forth across the border since the late 1800's and there are family relationships on both sides with ties to each other.
In addition there was a horrific Halifax harbor explosion in 1917, the people of Boston and New England immediately sent train loads of aid including Doctors, nurses, medical supplies in addition to food, clothes, household goods and money. This endeared the people of the Maritimes and Nova Scotia to New Englanders so much that to this day they still send a huge Christmas tree to Boston for display just after Thanksgiving every year.
The relationship is so strong that when there was talk of Quebec leaving the Confederation a strong number of Maritimers expressed sentiments of joining the US
rather than continuing being tied to the Western Provicences to which they have little in common. Talking with New Brunswick and PEI relatives surprised me
by saying the Canadian Federation is nowhere near as strong as the American statehood relationship. In the wonderful PBS special "The last train across Canada"
the host spent time with Manitoba and Saskatchewan ranchers and people living on the boarder who said they had a much closer and stronger relationship to
the people of North Dakota and Minnesota than the did with fellow Canadians
Logged
RBW
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 504


Re: Who Decided WJBK Detroit Should Be The Canadian Satellite Fox Affiliate?
« Reply #13 on: January 25, 2012, 08:57:58 PM »

Part of the reason WJBK is there is so that there is a balance and nonduplication of syndicated programming. If you picked WXYZ from Detroit, WTOL from Toledo and WGRZ from Buffalo, there is a chance that all 3 carry one or more syndicated programs - but with all stations from one market - you wouldn't see Wheel of Fortune on the American channels at once (for example).  Look at it this way - WWJ's lack of local news probably balances WJBK's news (compared to other markets).

It's the end of the day... and maybe my brain has fried  Tongue ... But could you please clarify this post so I can understand it better.
Logged

If you're only as young as you feel -- why does reminiscing make me feel old!
M.J.
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2078


Re: Who Decided WJBK Detroit Should Be The Canadian Satellite Fox Affiliate?
« Reply #14 on: January 27, 2012, 09:45:21 AM »

Part of the reason WJBK is there is so that there is a balance and nonduplication of syndicated programming. If you picked WXYZ from Detroit, WTOL from Toledo and WGRZ from Buffalo, there is a chance that all 3 carry one or more syndicated programs - but with all stations from one market - you wouldn't see Wheel of Fortune on the American channels at once (for example).  Look at it this way - WWJ's lack of local news probably balances WJBK's news (compared to other markets).

It's the end of the day... and maybe my brain has fried  Tongue ... But could you please clarify this post so I can understand it better.

Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that Wheel/Jeopardy! aired on WDIV (NBC) Detroit, WTOL (CBS) Toledo, and WEWS (ABC) Cleveland. If a cable system carried those three stations, you would have the same programming on those three channels, plus whatever Canadian channels were carrying it. Of course, the U.S. stations get sim-subbed, but from the viewers' standpoint, there's a lack of choice when 4 channels on the lower end of the dial have the same shows at the same time.
Logged
RBW
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 504


Re: Who Decided WJBK Detroit Should Be The Canadian Satellite Fox Affiliate?
« Reply #15 on: January 27, 2012, 11:31:33 AM »

Ahhhhhh... of course!  That damn substitution rule is the pits. Which makes me think that the ability to receive the "western" feeds would effectively kill that process.  IS that true?
Logged

If you're only as young as you feel -- why does reminiscing make me feel old!
azumanga
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4993


Re: Who Decided WJBK Detroit Should Be The Canadian Satellite Fox Affiliate?
« Reply #16 on: January 27, 2012, 12:05:15 PM »

Ahhhhhh... of course!  That damn substitution rule is the pits. Which makes me think that the ability to receive the "western" feeds would effectively kill that process.  IS that true?

Usually is, but it depends on system and situation -- Shaw Direct and most cable systems offer stations from both coasts, with Shaw Direct simsubbing according to post code and the local systems sinsubbing according to the available local signals. Bell TV also has both eastern and western feeds, but implements nationwide simsubbing, usually with Toronto simsubbing over Boston and Vancouver simsubbing over Seattle; viewers experience simsubbing, regardless of where they live. And of course, some programs that are seen nationwide, such as the Super Bowl, are simsubbed nationwide. There were reports that some Shaw Direct customers unplug, and plug back in, their receivers (sometimes repeatedly), just so they can get the original feed.
Logged
chrish
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 569


Re: Who Decided WJBK Detroit Should Be The Canadian Satellite Fox Affiliate?
« Reply #17 on: January 28, 2012, 01:57:18 AM »

I forgot this one.....when traveling in the Maritimes you will often hear a description of those to the south (New England) as the Boston States.
Logged
spencerkarter85
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 305


Re: Who Decided WJBK Detroit Should Be The Canadian Satellite Fox Affiliate?
« Reply #18 on: March 13, 2012, 01:46:00 AM »

The Boston and Seattle network affiliates are available in Canada to anyone with Bell TV (formerly ExpressVU).

Well the Canadians got lucky! Shocked Here in the USA on satellite TV on getting east/west network feeds is different than in Canada, if they don't have local stations on satellite or lived in so-called 'unserved' household, they have to apply to a waiver to their local TV stations (if approved or denied) to watch the network feeds in SD from both coasts and/or HD from your own coast. If you already have locals, you're so out of luck unfortunately, it's a SHVA/SHVIA/SHVERA/STELA thing.
Logged
FreddyE1977
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4909


Re: Who Decided WJBK Detroit Should Be The Canadian Satellite Fox Affiliate?
« Reply #19 on: March 21, 2012, 09:28:30 AM »

A business contact in Winnipeg told me that his cable system said they had replaced the
Detroit stations with Buffalo and Rochester because of "all that coverage of shootings and
street crime on the Detroit newscasts".   No idea if there is any truth to that. 
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.277 seconds with 20 queries.