RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 20, 2013, 06:30:11 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Can The AM Band Be Saved?  (Read 7820 times)
radiophiler
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 410


Re: Can The AM Band Be Saved?
« Reply #100 on: February 09, 2012, 11:11:44 AM »

But here's the question:

Given the already crowded nature of FM in the U.S., would it be possible for a migration, a la Canada or Mexico, of AMs to FMs? Even a 75% migration, or 50%? Seems as though the FM band is too crowded already.

Possible or not?
Logged
Goat Rodeo Cowboy
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4158


Re: Can The AM Band Be Saved?
« Reply #101 on: February 09, 2012, 11:55:49 AM »


Given the already crowded nature of FM in the U.S., would it be possible for a migration, a la Canada or Mexico, of AMs to FMs? Even a 75% migration, or 50%? Seems as though the FM band is too crowded already.


Has the FCC or any industry group done a computer modeling of this question? 

My "off the top of my head" guess is that the people who could afford to staff or fund such a study have no interest in finding a solution that is equitable to "small potatoes" operators and communties.  The financially stable organizations simply hire a consulting firm to find themselves the best possible moves and changes.  Everyone else can do their own thing.

When I travel across country to visit my ancestral home or visit my children in another state,  I observe a number of stations and markets that have a hard time just staying alive...  much less have the time, energy and funding to play "high-tech what-if".  The easy answer is:  Darwin at work.  If they are to small, too weak, too dumb to find their own improvement in the spectrum,  they deserve to become extinct. 

The more profound observation is:  I'm not worried about the loser who owns the station with the unpainted building with the gravel parking lot.  I am concerned that the regulatory system look after the people, the listeners that live in that geography.  If their station owner won't do, can't do the right thing....  the SYSTEM should do the right thing."

 
Logged

Community broadcasting blogged at www.yourlpfm.com
secondchoice
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2250


Re: Can The AM Band Be Saved?
« Reply #102 on: February 09, 2012, 12:07:53 PM »

But here's the question:

Given the already crowded nature of FM in the U.S., would it be possible for a migration, a la Canada or Mexico, of AMs to FMs? Even a 75% migration, or 50%? Seems as though the FM band is too crowded already.

Possible or not?

With the current 88 to 108 MZ band, in a lot of big cities: no. There are some 250 watt "translator" opportunities for some AM's to get a FM but a lot are being gobble up by big existing FM's for HD.  In some rural low populated areas there could be a migration.  I am not current on the "protections" (distant and frequency) the existing classes of FM get, but with the various "move in's" over the years the chances of a "B" (C2) 50 KW @ 500 ft or better signal in a top market are very slim.  Some of the old analog TV channels would work but there is no receiver base.
Logged
Goat Rodeo Cowboy
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4158


Re: Can The AM Band Be Saved?
« Reply #103 on: February 09, 2012, 01:32:33 PM »


I am not current on the "protections" (distant and frequency) the existing classes of FM get, but with the various "move in's" over the years the chances of a "B" (C2) 50 KW @ 500 ft or better signal in a top market are very slim.


To do something as "radical" or "disruptive" as the Canadian plan,  and do it with any resemblance of even-handedness,  there would need to be some even-handedness exercised by Congress and the FCC.  Spread the misery!  That could mean something like changing the maximum power from 50KW to 30Kw  (from 100KW to 60KW in the Western states) to make room.

If it is essential to tell the guy running the 3rd generation family ownership of an AM station in a thriving rural market that he has to shut down if he can't find an FM channel,  then it is also essential to tell the owners of 50KW FMs in Cleveland or NYC or Boston they are going to have to throttle back to make room for others.

What's the old joke I heard in Oklahoma years ago?  Local industry?  Yup.  In our town we make the front end of horses.  (at this point there is a pause by the story teller as you wrap your brain around what was just said.)  Then we ship them to Washington for final assembly.

They got some horse's rear ends in Washington,  but I'm not sure they are extreme enough, tough enough,  to ever tackle the broadcast spectrum allocation with integrity.

Logged

Community broadcasting blogged at www.yourlpfm.com
semoochie
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1476


Re: Can The AM Band Be Saved?
« Reply #104 on: February 09, 2012, 03:12:58 PM »

With the advent of the Class C0, I don't suppose there's really any need for a full C anymore.
Logged
w9wi
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4292


Re: Can The AM Band Be Saved?
« Reply #105 on: February 09, 2012, 04:16:39 PM »

One reason the Canadian "plan" works is that Canada didn't authorize the massive number of non-signal-viable AM stations the U.S. did.  In 1970 there were nine AM stations and seven FMs, and about 350,000 people, in Omaha.  In Calgary, there were five AMs, one FM, and about 400,000 people. 

ALL of the Calgary AMs ran at least 10,000 watts at night.  Only one of the Omaha stations (KFAB) did.  Four of the Omaha AMs were daytimers, and two more Class IV operations. 

Under Canadian technical standards, chances are KFAB, KOIL, and WOW would have been the only AM stations in Omaha.

It's a LOT easier to find FM homes for everyone when you only have five stations to find homes for. 
Logged
K6JHU
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 865


Re: Can The AM Band Be Saved?
« Reply #106 on: February 13, 2012, 10:24:15 PM »

My wife an I were in an antique store today. She noticed some low prices on old radios (all AM). She asked me why I didn't buy one at such a bargain. I waited until we were a little ways out of town in the car. Then I hit FM scan and got a half dozen plus FM with full limiting and stereo. Then I hit AM scan and got only one listenable station (a 50kW blowtorch) carrying Rush. The rest were not above the noise level or were being intefered with by other stations. Can the AM band be saved. Not as it exists now.
Logged
ddsparxx
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1719


Re: Can The AM Band Be Saved?
« Reply #107 on: February 14, 2012, 05:24:16 AM »

About 4 years ago I was in an antique store near Culpeper, VA, and the radio at that store was tuned to Culpeper's WCVA AM 1490, an adult standards station, and I didn't hear any noise from the station.
Logged
K6JHU
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 865


Re: Can The AM Band Be Saved?
« Reply #108 on: February 14, 2012, 09:42:01 AM »

I can list the exceptions (e.g. 1220 in Stillwater, Minn.) but I can also list AM stations that can't even cover their city of license with a listenable signal at night. BTW, while I like adult standards. MOYL just grates on my nerves. I seem to remember a company that will sell a Part 15 AM transmitter and music package specifically designed for antique stores  Smiley
Logged
KeithE4
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4510

Keith Elster WW7KE


Re: Can The AM Band Be Saved?
« Reply #109 on: February 14, 2012, 09:54:26 AM »

I seem to remember a company that will sell a Part 15 AM transmitter and music package specifically designed for antique stores  Smiley

That would redefine the term "covering your market," but that's exactly what an in-store Part 15 station would be doing. Grin
Logged

We have to save the Earth!  It's the only planet with football and beer.
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.905 seconds with 19 queries.