RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 24, 2013, 05:22:34 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: WXGL 107.3 Transmitter  (Read 1554 times)
gamefreak
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 540


WXGL 107.3 Transmitter
« on: March 06, 2012, 02:03:12 PM »

Back in 2004 shortly after 107.3 The Eagle was launched Cox had a CP upgrade to move WXGL 107.3 from its Oldsmar transmitter to the WDUV site in Holiday. With a nice license upgrade to a Class C0. Giving the station a lot more height and a better location. Why did Cox back out of this one.

I was reading a LPFM up in here in Citrus County even moved from the 107.5 to 103.3 frequency to accommodate the move.

You would think that Cox would see the whole idea of moving 107.3 to the WDUV site would mean one less Transmitter site to maintain. Overall lowering costs for Cox.
Logged
Parttimer
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3038


Re: WXGL 107.3 Transmitter
« Reply #1 on: March 06, 2012, 03:54:41 PM »

A C0 is not an upgrade from a C1 (which the Eagle is now), it's a downgrade.

This would have saved them money but likely sacrificed coverage, and the Eagle is doing very well.
Logged
gamefreak
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 540


Re: WXGL 107.3 Transmitter
« Reply #2 on: March 06, 2012, 04:35:47 PM »

http://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/fm-broadcast-station-classes-and-service-contours

According to this link from the FCC a Class C0 is the second most powerful license, Next to a Full Class-C of course, The 3rd most powerful is a C1.
Logged
Parttimer
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3038


Re: WXGL 107.3 Transmitter
« Reply #3 on: March 06, 2012, 05:53:05 PM »

They're at 100,000 watts now. Not knowing what the CP said, I'd assume the higher tower would have been at a lower power.
Logged
necrat123
Guest
Re: WXGL 107.3 Transmitter
« Reply #4 on: March 06, 2012, 07:02:07 PM »

They're at 100,000 watts now. Not knowing what the CP said, I'd assume the higher tower would have been at a lower power.

Nope, thats why they filed to upgrade the class from C1 to C0, so they could remain at 100kW

First the app:  The app called for 100kW ERP combined into the 97.9 & 105.5 antenna at the tower at 410 meters, versus the current licensed facility of 100kW @ 182 meters.

Secondly, a C0 is 100kW up to 450 meters, while a C1 is 100kW up to 300 meters. (A C is 100kW up to 600 meters)

The app had a couple of minor objections filed against it.

Hope this helps somewhat understand better.
Logged
jmtillery
Jeffrey M. "Mark" Tillery, Esquire, Ph. D., --- J. M. Tillery & Associates, P. A.
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2645


Re: WXGL 107.3 Transmitter
« Reply #5 on: March 06, 2012, 09:08:47 PM »

A C0 is not an upgrade from a C1 (which the Eagle is now), it's a downgrade.

This would have saved them money but likely sacrificed coverage, and the Eagle is doing very well.

A class C0 is, most definately, a class upgrade from a class C1 considering a C1 may operate with a maximum power level of 100kw with a maximum antenna height of 981 feet. A class C0 may operate with a maximum 100kw power level while the antenna height may be raised to approximately 1,500, an additional 500+ feet, without a power reduction.
Logged

Jeffrey M. "Mark" Tillery, Esquire, Ph. D.
J. M. Tillery & Associates, P. A.
Online: www.jmtillery.com
Email: jmt@jmtillery.com
gamefreak
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 540


Re: WXGL 107.3 Transmitter
« Reply #6 on: March 07, 2012, 03:58:57 PM »

If Cox ever did pull of this move WXGL would have been almost identical to WXTB 97.9 signal wise.

The signal would go pretty far north. Way farther to the north than most other Tampa stations. Covering all of the far northern communities better than the rest. Which is Pretty much all of Citrus and Hernando Counties. Crystal River, Inverness, Spring Hill and Brooksville. The only two stations that cover those areas really well are WDUV and WXTB.

Believe it or not I actually hear WDUV being played in bushiness's all over Citrus County.

At the same Time Cox would actually get a better signal throughout over parts of the Tampa area. Including a City-Grade signal as far east of the Hillsborough-Polk County Line.
Logged
jmtillery
Jeffrey M. "Mark" Tillery, Esquire, Ph. D., --- J. M. Tillery & Associates, P. A.
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2645


Re: WXGL 107.3 Transmitter
« Reply #7 on: March 07, 2012, 10:05:26 PM »

If Cox ever did pull of this move WXGL would have been almost identical to WXTB 97.9 signal wise.

The signal would go pretty far north. Way farther to the north than most other Tampa stations. Covering all of the far northern communities better than the rest. Which is Pretty much all of Citrus and Hernando Counties. Crystal River, Inverness, Spring Hill and Brooksville. The only two stations that cover those areas really well are WDUV and WXTB.

Believe it or not I actually hear WDUV being played in bushiness's all over Citrus County.

At the same Time Cox would actually get a better signal throughout over parts of the Tampa area. Including a City-Grade signal as far east of the Hillsborough-Polk County Line.

As a full C0 from the WXTB / WDUV tower site, WXGL will place a city grade signal in Citrus county.
Logged

Jeffrey M. "Mark" Tillery, Esquire, Ph. D.
J. M. Tillery & Associates, P. A.
Online: www.jmtillery.com
Email: jmt@jmtillery.com
Nostalgia
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 649


Re: WXGL 107.3 Transmitter
« Reply #8 on: March 08, 2012, 09:06:07 AM »

Speaking of the WXTB/WDUV tower site, the skyline above Anclote seems to be missing about 1500' of steel!  Looks like the Channel 10 tower has been dismantled.  When did this happen, and how am I just noticing it!

Were there any radio stations on the second tower?  If so, where did they go.  I know there were some communications and ham radio repeaters there.
Logged
rfrus
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 177


Re: WXGL 107.3 Transmitter
« Reply #9 on: March 08, 2012, 01:18:53 PM »

No radio on the other tower. Only Channel 10.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.271 seconds with 20 queries.