RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 23, 2013, 04:38:36 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Could the Reds leave WLW?  (Read 640 times)
keys2
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 457


Could the Reds leave WLW?
« on: November 29, 2005, 03:48:58 PM »

Interesting article in last week's Cincinnati Business Courier. There is speculation that the Reds new owner may pursue a different media strategy and look at doing what the Cards did in St. Louis. Part of that involved the Cards leaving KMOX for KTRS. Why? Because the organization bought a 50 percent stake in KTRS. The dynamics here in Cincy are much different though, where Clear Channel already owns all the good AM signals.

Anyway, here's the link:

http://cincinnati.bizjournals.com/cincinnati/stories/2005/11/28/story1.html
Logged
gr8oldies
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 8688

Whatever Gets You Through The Night


Re: Could the Reds leave WLW?
« Reply #1 on: November 29, 2005, 04:50:59 PM »

Unless the Reds want to go to an FM flagship, it doesn't seem likely. WGRR or B-105 might be possibilities.

______________
..from the Ball Park Franks sponsored gr8oldies keyboard...

Logged
microbob
rimember

Online Online

Posts: 1920


Re: Could the Reds leave WLW?
« Reply #2 on: November 29, 2005, 10:23:50 PM »

I don't see it happening for them as there are very few stations up for grabs in this market with good signals. One possibility could be they they could start from scratch with the newly announced 100.3 FM coming to Norwood or maybe 97.7 when it moves to Mason.










> Unless the Reds want to go to an FM flagship, it doesn't
> seem likely. WGRR or B-105 might be possibilities.
>

Edited by microbob on 11/30/05 04:24 AM.

Logged
schmave
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1608

Occupation:writer


Re: Could the Reds leave WLW?
« Reply #3 on: December 01, 2005, 11:47:45 AM »

> Interesting article in last week's Cincinnati Business
> Courier. There is speculation that the Reds new owner may
> pursue a different media strategy and look at doing what the
> Cards did in St. Louis. Part of that involved the Cards
> leaving KMOX for KTRS. Why? Because the organization bought
> a 50 percent stake in KTRS. The dynamics here in Cincy are
> much different though, where Clear Channel already owns all
> the good AM signals.
>
> Anyway, here's the link:
>
http://cincinna> ti.bizjournals.com/cincinnati/stories/2005/11/28/story1.html

You have to hope to goodness this NEVER happens. Those of us in much of Ohio wouldn't be terribly, terribly affected because there are affiliates to cover us, but if 700 indeed doesn't carry the games someday the Reds will have to pick up a lot more affiliates to fill in gaps in coverage.
Luckily Clear Channel pretty much owns Cincinnati AM radio, so WLW is covered in many respects.
If the Reds want to look anywhere at improving their media/marketing, try increasing your presence both on FSN Ohio and local over-the-air TV. If FSN loses the Indians, as is being heavily speculated in Cleveland, the Reds need to increase their presence with weekly shows, more live pre- and post-game shows, off-season things, etc. And put some games back on free TV!
Logged
gr8oldies
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 8688

Whatever Gets You Through The Night


Re: Could the Reds leave WLW?
« Reply #4 on: December 01, 2005, 03:53:41 PM »

The Reds leaving the big one would be a bad move. The Reds need those busloads of people driving in from all over Ohio, Indiana and Kentucky, and even if they could make up for a lot of WLW's coverage by having more affiliates, there are a lot of people who count on WLW's signal to hear the Reds, especially while traveling.

KTRS has a reasonably comparable signal to KMOX's, at least throughout Missouri and Illinois. There's no similar opportunity in Cincinnati.

 

______________
..from the Ball Park Franks sponsored gr8oldies keyboard...

Logged
collegeDJ86
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 316

Likes radio both behind the mic and the speakers


Re: Could the Reds leave WLW?
« Reply #5 on: December 01, 2005, 07:16:57 PM »

> The Reds leaving the big one would be a bad move. The Reds
> need those busloads of people driving in from all over Ohio,
> Indiana and Kentucky, and even if they could make up for a
> lot of WLW's coverage by having more affiliates, there are a
> lot of people who count on WLW's signal to hear the Reds,
> especially while traveling.
>
> KTRS has a reasonably comparable signal to KMOX's, at least
> throughout Missouri and Illinois. There's no similar
> opportunity in Cincinnati.
>

I've not ever listened to KTRS, nor do I know how far it reaches...

But wouldn't the switch from KMOX to KTRS in St. Louis be comparable to a WLW to WCKY switch in terms of coverage?  I mean, 1530 is also a clear channel like 700 isn't it?  I don't even think KTRS is a clear channel...
Logged

news anchor/reporter, WHCU 870 AM, Ithaca (2008-2009), WSAJ radio:  General Manager (2007), News Director (2005-06), on-air personality (2004-2008), football PBP & color commentary (2006-07)...
gr8oldies
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 8688

Whatever Gets You Through The Night


Re: Could the Reds leave WLW?
« Reply #6 on: December 02, 2005, 07:51:31 AM »

It'd actually be like a switch to WKRC (KTRS is also on 550). Checking the Radio-Locator.com maps, daytime coverage between KMOX at 1120 and KTRS is pretty similar. No big skywave at night for KTRS, but they seem to have decent coverage in the metro and into Illinois and parts of Missouri.

______________
..from the Ball Park Franks sponsored gr8oldies keyboard...

Logged
KJCB
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4384


Re: Could the Reds leave WLW?
« Reply #7 on: December 03, 2005, 04:50:05 AM »

> It'd actually be like a switch to WKRC (KTRS is also on
> 550). Checking the Radio-Locator.com maps, daytime coverage
> between KMOX at 1120 and KTRS is pretty similar. No big
> skywave at night for KTRS, but they seem to have decent
> coverage in the metro and into Illinois and parts of
> Missouri.

God no, you can't preempt Dave Ramsey!
Logged
Inventor989
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 336

Making noise come out of little box since 1973.


Re: Could the Reds leave WLW?
« Reply #8 on: December 06, 2005, 05:03:28 PM »

> But wouldn't the switch from KMOX to KTRS in St. Louis be
> comparable to a WLW to WCKY switch in terms of coverage?  I
> mean, 1530 is also a clear channel like 700 isn't it?  I
> don't even think KTRS is a clear channel...
>

KTRS at 550 with their 5kw does very well on groundwave, not so well on skywave due to the frequency's regional status and the resulting QRM...but it's a much better 550 than WKRC in terms of coverage both day and night.  And it's every bit the equal of 50kw KMOX due to low dial position (and, I suspect, antenna problems on KMOX, which has always been one of the weaker clears).  WKRC has real problems at night that KTRS does not have relative to its metro.  WCKY 1530, being at the high end of the dial, has much poorer groundwave coverage than WLW or WKRC, even though it's 50kw on a relatively clear frequency, due to its wavelength.  You need a lot more power at the high end of the dial to get the same coverage.  WCKY does provide excellent distant coverage, however, as skywave propagation increases significantly above 1400.  If the Reds leave WLW, I'd be looking for them on one of the full B FMs...with a lot more affiliates to fill in the gaps WLW would leave behind.
Logged
almaniac27
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 855


Re: Could the Reds leave WLW?
« Reply #9 on: December 06, 2005, 10:07:03 PM »

> > It'd actually be like a switch to WKRC (KTRS is also on
> > 550). Checking the Radio-Locator.com maps, daytime
> coverage
> > between KMOX at 1120 and KTRS is pretty similar. No big
> > skywave at night for KTRS, but they seem to have decent
> > coverage in the metro and into Illinois and parts of
> > Missouri.
>
> God no, you can't preempt Dave Ramsey!
>

It would be nice to not have that idiot Michael Savage on every night.  And I'm sure Scott Sloan would be pleased if the Reds moved.
Logged

"And if I don't see ya, in a long, long while
I'll try to find you
Left of the dial"
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.304 seconds with 19 queries.