RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 24, 2013, 10:29:20 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Longwave in the Americas  (Read 3391 times)
KTN Corp
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 445


Longwave in the Americas
« on: March 17, 2012, 09:17:38 PM »

We all know that mainstream interest in broadcasting <30 MHz is at an all-time low due to iPods, internet radio, etc.  Some have suggested expanding FM down to 76 MHz to accommodate existing AM stations.  Does anybody see longwave as a supplement to the crowded mediumwave band or an expansion of broadcasting opportunities (new broadcasters)?

What frequencies will it use?  We know that it will be spaced at 10 kHz but will the frequencies used be close to the European band of frequencies, below the existing MW band (<530 kHz), or somewhere else?
Logged
KeithE4
rimember

Online Online

Posts: 4516

Keith Elster WW7KE


Re: Longwave in the Americas
« Reply #1 on: March 18, 2012, 02:24:27 AM »

We all know that mainstream interest in broadcasting <30 MHz is at an all-time low due to iPods, internet radio, etc.  Some have suggested expanding FM down to 76 MHz to accommodate existing AM stations.  Does anybody see longwave as a supplement to the crowded mediumwave band or an expansion of broadcasting opportunities (new broadcasters)?

What frequencies will it use?  We know that it will be spaced at 10 kHz but will the frequencies used be close to the European band of frequencies, below the existing MW band (<530 kHz), or somewhere else?

There has never been any longwave broadcasting in the western hemisphere, and there are almost no LW receivers in the hands of the general public.  Only DXers and hams would have them, which is less than 3% of all radio listeners, assuming that every single ham operator has one (and they don't).

Frequencies below 88 MHz are becoming next-to-useless for broadcasting of any kind in North America (except for Cuba and American bible-bangers).  Just ask the unfortunate TV stations who were fool enough to pick Channels 2-6 for DTV, or the AM stations that can't move to, or simulcast on FM.  Outside of ham radio, CB, religious & propaganda broadcasters aimed mostly at Africa & Asia, and aircraft/marine/military backup systems, the lower frequencies are pretty much dead now.  Satellites and the interwebs made them obsolete.

Logged

We have to save the Earth!  It's the only planet with football and beer.
TomT
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1272


Re: Longwave in the Americas
« Reply #2 on: March 18, 2012, 02:45:11 PM »

DSL uses a good chunk of the long wave (and up into medium wave).  Not a pretty mix for in home listening, along with all the other sources of noise.
Logged
Darth_vader
America's Vancouver
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2613


Re: Longwave in the Americas
« Reply #3 on: March 19, 2012, 04:17:16 PM »

Longwave will probably never be used for broadcasting here because it is being used for aero-nautical navigation beacons and DGPS.

Quote
"[T]here are almost no LW receivers in the hands of the general public."

Many of the better Radioshack SW-MW-FM radios had/ve LW for years. A number of the Grundig portables (like my Yacht Boy 400) also have it.

Quote
"Outside of two-way radio and religious propaganda broadcasters aimed mostly at Africa & Asia, and aircraft/marine/military backup systems, the lower frequencies are pretty much dead now. Satellites and the interwebs made them obsolete."
(corrections are my own.)

No, increasing amounts of poorly-regulated electrical noise from poorly-constructed and shielded electronic equipment did that. The only thing satellites and streaming did was make it irrelevant for domestic broadcasting.
Logged

I am now posting aircheck files and such on Youtube under https://youtube.com/user/oldradiotapes on an experimental basis.

When downloading any of these files, please use only the type 22 (720-P) option when available, as it provides the highest-fidelity audio (MP4/192k AAC).
druidhillsradio
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 571


Re: Longwave in the Americas
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2012, 01:40:07 PM »

Isn't <30 Mhz refered to as shortwave?
Logged
TomT
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1272


Re: Longwave in the Americas
« Reply #5 on: May 22, 2012, 06:13:36 AM »

Yep
Logged
Matt Smith
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 886

Station Manager for WGSR-TV, Reidsville, NC


Re: Longwave in the Americas
« Reply #6 on: May 22, 2012, 09:55:55 AM »

30kHz -> 300khz = Longwave
300kHz -> 3MHz = Medium Wave
3MHz -> 30MHz = Shortwave
30MHz -> 300MHz = VHF
300MHz -> 3GHZ = UHF

Later . . . .
Logged

Matt Smith, Station Manager
WGSR-TV "Star-47" Reidsville, NC
WMDV-TV "Star44" Danville, VA
Darth_vader
America's Vancouver
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2613


Re: Longwave in the Americas
« Reply #7 on: December 17, 2012, 02:51:06 PM »

3 GHz - 30GHz = SHF
30 GHz - 300 GHz = EHF
300 GHz - 3 THz (and upward) = ???
Logged

I am now posting aircheck files and such on Youtube under https://youtube.com/user/oldradiotapes on an experimental basis.

When downloading any of these files, please use only the type 22 (720-P) option when available, as it provides the highest-fidelity audio (MP4/192k AAC).
KeithE4
rimember

Online Online

Posts: 4516

Keith Elster WW7KE


Re: Longwave in the Americas
« Reply #8 on: December 17, 2012, 03:21:31 PM »

Longwave will probably never be used for broadcasting here because it is being used for aero-nautical navigation beacons and DGPS.

Quote
"[T]here are almost no LW receivers in the hands of the general public."

Many of the better Radioshack SW-MW-FM radios had/ve LW for years. A number of the Grundig portables (like my Yacht Boy 400) also have it.

But how many of these receivers were actually sold?  Compared to consumer AM/FM radios (and those are becoming fewer and fewer), I'll guess that they're a very small percentage.

Quote
Quote
"Outside of two-way radio and religious propaganda broadcasters aimed mostly at Africa & Asia, and aircraft/marine/military backup systems, the lower frequencies are pretty much dead now. Satellites and the interwebs made them obsolete."
(corrections are my own.)

No, increasing amounts of poorly-regulated electrical noise from poorly-constructed and shielded electronic equipment did that. The only thing satellites and streaming did was make it irrelevant for domestic broadcasting.

That certainly hasn't helped, but if anyone cared, those devices would have been redesigned, fixed, or replaced decades ago.  But AM has been on a downward spiral for 40 years, and shortwave hasn't been in the mind of most non-hobbyist American consumers since the '60s at the latest.  World War II is over.  So are the most of the old-time international broadcasters.

It doesn't matter anymore if electrical devices spew their garbage all over the place.  Comparatively few people are listening to frequencies below 88 MHz.  Other than a few hundred AM stations that are still successful (and that number continues to drop), the lower frequencies are completely out of the American mainstream now.
Logged

We have to save the Earth!  It's the only planet with football and beer.
kinphoenix2
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 101


Re: Longwave in the Americas
« Reply #9 on: December 20, 2012, 02:59:40 AM »

Longwave will probably never be used for broadcasting here because it is being used for aero-nautical navigation beacons and DGPS.

Quote
"[T]here are almost no LW receivers in the hands of the general public."

Many of the better Radioshack SW-MW-FM radios had/ve LW for years. A number of the Grundig portables (like my Yacht Boy 400) also have it.

But how many of these receivers were actually sold?  Compared to consumer AM/FM radios (and those are becoming fewer and fewer), I'll guess that they're a very small percentage.

Quote
Quote
"Outside of two-way radio and religious propaganda broadcasters aimed mostly at Africa & Asia, and aircraft/marine/military backup systems, the lower frequencies are pretty much dead now. Satellites and the interwebs made them obsolete."
(corrections are my own.)

No, increasing amounts of poorly-regulated electrical noise from poorly-constructed and shielded electronic equipment did that. The only thing satellites and streaming did was make it irrelevant for domestic broadcasting.
YOU SAID IT

That certainly hasn't helped, but if anyone cared, those devices would have been redesigned, fixed, or replaced decades ago.  But AM has been on a downward spiral for 40 years, and shortwave hasn't been in the mind of most non-hobbyist American consumers since the '60s at the latest.  World War II is over.  So are the most of the old-time international broadcasters. I wish they DID care

It doesn't matter anymore if electrical devices spew their garbage all over the place.  Comparatively few people are listening to frequencies below 88 MHz.  Other than a few hundred AM stations that are still successful (and that number continues to drop), the lower frequencies are completely out of the American mainstream now.

I have an opinion as to why LF, and even SW are out of the American mainstream- but it's a political rant more suited for the Off The Air board than this one - along with a rant on FCC regulations board too. I wish I could name drop but I can't - but politics and money has a lot to do with it, and not the lack of it in the industry (no matter WHAT you're told..)that causes this thorn in my side.

The word "mainstream" quoted is the magic word here. People NEED to care about these things, yet I am afraid even if they DID, it wouldn't matter, because the powers that be in the FCC are paid off and it's more of a political and commercial enterprise than a "public service". The airwaves are supposed to be OURS- but they get sold off to the highest bidder. We don't hear what we want to hear over the air, we hear what they WANT us to hear (not a conspiracy theorist, just a grumpy young lady who's become quite disenchanted)

OK- rant over, I hope I haven't 'hijacked' the thread as the people say- cheers
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.37 seconds with 20 queries.