RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 25, 2013, 07:41:18 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: WGST No Longer Affiliated With The Weather Channel Radio Network  (Read 2589 times)
AMFMRadFan
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 117


WGST No Longer Affiliated With The Weather Channel Radio Network
« on: March 23, 2012, 05:07:31 AM »

    Yes, that is correct in the subject line. I just heard a meteorologist from AccuWeather.
Logged
AMFMRadFan
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 117


Re: WGST No Longer Affiliated With The Weather Channel Radio Network
« Reply #1 on: March 23, 2012, 05:28:50 AM »

    The meteorologist's name is Dave Bowers. More meteorologists are to come.
Logged
FLjack2
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 426


Re: WGST No Longer Affiliated With The Weather Channel Radio Network
« Reply #2 on: March 26, 2012, 10:01:09 AM »

This HAD to be a purely financial move.  With the Weather Channel based in Atlanta, what local station would ever consider dumping them for Accuweather?   Huh
Logged
jabba17
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2792


Re: WGST No Longer Affiliated With The Weather Channel Radio Network
« Reply #3 on: March 26, 2012, 10:00:24 PM »

This HAD to be a purely financial move.  With the Weather Channel based in Atlanta, what local station would ever consider dumping them for Accuweather?   Huh
Maybe the ComcastNBCUni buyout of TWC has something to do with it...not sure what since ComcastNBC isn't really into radio anymore.  Did CC do this as a national deal, perhaps?

Accuweather is coming on strong...TWC is becoming more of a lifestyle channel and that pace has quickened since the ComcastNBC buyout.  If you just want the stinkin' weather the accuweather.com website and apps are better than the bloated mess of TWC's digital properties.  Not as good in some respects (their radar sucks), but they are constantly improving their products.
Logged

"When broadcasting over the radio, there are certain words we must omit.
Like 'BEEP' and 'BUZZ' and 'GOBBLE-GOBBLE', by gosh we can't even say shhhhhaving cream!"
AMFMRadFan
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 117


Re: WGST No Longer Affiliated With The Weather Channel Radio Network
« Reply #4 on: March 30, 2012, 07:39:43 AM »

    No, this had nothing to do with Comcast NBC Universal buying out The Weather Channel. That was done a couple of years ago. As for the possibility of this being a financial move on WGST's part, yes. This isn't the first time this has happened. Back in either 2005 or 2006 around that time approximately, WGST dumped The Weather Channel for forecasts from FOX5. Then Randy & Spiff started doing the morning show for awhile. Randy & Spiff got split up; Spiff got fired; Randy stayed around. Eventually, WGST brought back The Weather Channel. Then, of course, Randy left WGST to reunite with Spiff at AGH (Atlanta's Greatest Hits) 106.7 FM WYAY. No, Randy & Spiff's presence at WGST had nothing to do with bringing back the TWC affiliation. Does all this mean I will be listening to WGST less? No, I will continue listening to WGST, and the amount of time I spend listening will continue to be the same. As far as TWC Radio Network flagship affiliates are concerned, the closest affiliates are 93.3 The Joy FM WVFJ south of Atlanta along with 4 out of the 5 Rome Radio Partners stations up in Rome: Magjk (pronounced Magic) 1360 AM WGJK, 93.5 Life FM WSRM, Q102-102.3 FM WQTU, and South 107-107.1 FM WTSH. NewsTalk 1470 AM WRGA may have been affiliated with TWC for some time in the past. I don't know when they dumped it for AccuWeather. It would be nice if TWC & AccuWeather merged, but the chances of that happening are very unlikely. As for WGST, as long as they don't start doing sports coverage again, we won't see a repeat of what happened when Randall Bloomquist was the program director. WGST doesn't need to let anyone else go. That is all.
Logged
newsjunkee1
Guest
Re: WGST No Longer Affiliated With The Weather Channel Radio Network
« Reply #5 on: March 30, 2012, 01:45:58 PM »

Good heavens guys...pay attention.  The Weather Channel is basically going out of the radio business.  They are laying off 15 people on Sunday, leaving only a half-dozen or so behind to do the very few markets they have decided to keep.  And it has everything to do with NBC buying them out.  I really am surprised this hasn't gotten more attention since it's been known in the industry since before Christmas.  AccuWeather has been swamped with new business over the last couple of months.
Logged
newsjunkee1
Guest
Re: WGST No Longer Affiliated With The Weather Channel Radio Network
« Reply #6 on: March 30, 2012, 02:05:53 PM »

BTW FMAMRadiofan...A lot of those Georgia affiliates that you mention, if not all of them, got their Weather Channel through the Georgia News Network, which is also now AccuWeather...Same reason as WGST.  Weather Channel Radio is GONE in Georgia
Logged
taylorengineer
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1770


Re: WGST No Longer Affiliated With The Weather Channel Radio Network
« Reply #7 on: March 30, 2012, 05:35:28 PM »

The Weather Channel should just go away all together. The radio service was terrible and the television version has not been worth watching for years.
Logged
AMFMRadFan
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 117


Re: WGST No Longer Affiliated With The Weather Channel Radio Network
« Reply #8 on: March 30, 2012, 10:41:13 PM »

BTW FMAMRadiofan...A lot of those Georgia affiliates that you mention, if not all of them, got their Weather Channel through the Georgia News Network, which is also now AccuWeather...Same reason as WGST.  Weather Channel Radio is GONE in Georgia
    newsjunkee1, thanks for the memo on the fact that TWC Radio Network is laying some people off. You're right on the fact that a lot of affiliates here in Georgia got the TWC Radio Network affiliation through GNN (Georgia News Network). Of course, WGST is the flagship for GNN. I knew all of that. Out of all the affiliates I mentioned earlier, WGST & WRGA are the only ones with GNN. Of course, there are many other GNN affiliates here in the state. Other examples are both WGAU & WNGC out of Athens. They never got their forecasts from TWC. Same is also true for WLJA in Elijay. WGAU & WNGC get their forecasts from WTOC-TV chief meteorologist John Wetherbee who used to work in Atlanta before moving to Savannah where WTOC is located. Here is the list of the affiliates still with TWC Radio Network: http://www.weather.com/aboutus/radio/partners/ga.html. And OMT (One More Thing), newsjunkie1, my username is AMFMRadFan, not FMAMRadioFan. Remember the AM before the FM. I forgive you for being dyslexic. That is all.
Logged
FLjack2
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 426


Re: WGST No Longer Affiliated With The Weather Channel Radio Network
« Reply #9 on: March 31, 2012, 05:49:06 AM »

The Weather Channel should just go away all together. The radio service was terrible and the television version has not been worth watching for years.
You know why the radio service was terrible?  When they went out to hire people, they hired weather people -- not radio people.  They (for the most part) didn't sound well on the radio.  I think it would have been better to hire radio people and tech them how to do weather than the other way around.  Plus, with a huge organization of weather folks behind them, a radio person could easily get help from "staff" to come up with a local forecast.

As far as the TV service, I stopped watching the weather channel when they started adding weather-related movies, series, etc.  The best part about The Weather Channel (and Headline News years ago) was that you could tune in ANYTIME and get weather (and news).  It's no longer the case. 
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.554 seconds with 19 queries.