RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 20, 2013, 09:21:38 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Kiss Name  (Read 2871 times)
MarioMania
California
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1251


Kiss Name
« on: March 31, 2012, 04:45:30 PM »

Does Clear Channel really have the Kiss Name for them selfs??

Seems like the Kiss Name can't be use outside of CC..or CC will complaindoes that include AM??
Logged
MarcB
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 7083

Proud to be a Radio Nerd from Connecticut.


Re: Kiss Name
« Reply #1 on: April 03, 2012, 06:02:54 PM »

I believe they have it trademarked. Obviously some exceptions are where the station was called KISS before CC came along, most noticeably 98.7 KISS-FM in NYC, which is owned by Emmis. I also know COX has a couple of stations called KISS.

Something interesting:

Clear Channel's own KISS 95.7 in Hartford has been called KISS going back to the days when they were Beautiful Music. They were called KISS 96 back then. Then they switched to KISS 95.7 when they flipped to Top 40 in 1984.
Logged
Greg Branch
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 523


Re: Kiss Name
« Reply #2 on: April 12, 2012, 08:13:05 AM »

I also know COX has a couple of stations called KISS.

Cox's KISS-FM San Antonio, which actually has the KISS calls.
Logged
Lkeller
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 6637


Re: Kiss Name
« Reply #3 on: April 16, 2012, 02:10:32 PM »

I also know COX has a couple of stations called KISS.

Cox's KISS-FM San Antonio, which actually has the KISS calls.

I don't know for sure, but I'm thinking that Clear Channel took ownership of the brand when they bought KIIS-FM in Los Angeles.  But I'm sure there were quite a few Kiss-FMs nationwide not affiliated with CC, but in existence before CC. Those would reasonably be "grand-fathered," I would think.  CC could probably make an issue out of it, and threaten lawsuits, but it would just make them look bad.  I'm sure they have more important things (like their huge debt-load) to worry about.
Logged
Greg Branch
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 523


Re: Kiss Name
« Reply #4 on: April 20, 2012, 02:59:22 PM »

Considering the real KISS-FM has had the calls in San Antonio for at least 35 years, I don't see how CC would have any case against Cox for using the KISS branding. As a matter of fact, if CC tried to bring a KISS branded station into SA, my guess would be that Cox would be within their rights to bring legal action to stop it.

It is ironic, however, that CC is based in San Antonio, yet the KISS station in their own backyard is owned by Cox.
Logged
RadioStarOne
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1799


Re: Kiss Name
« Reply #5 on: April 29, 2012, 02:16:26 PM »

What about a Hershey's KISS? They are the real deal, are they not? When it comes to trademarks? The human race has been kissing since the beginning of time! lol...trademark that!
Logged
Lkeller
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 6637


Re: Kiss Name
« Reply #6 on: April 30, 2012, 11:29:53 AM »

What about a Hershey's KISS? They are the real deal, are they not? When it comes to trademarks? The human race has been kissing since the beginning of time! lol...trademark that!

Funny.  But you can't trademark a word, or even a name for use in everything.  For example, if I wanted to open McDonald's Dry Cleaning, I doubt I'd have any problems. But if I wanted to open an independent McDonald's fast food outlet, an army of lawyers would descend on me so fast, I'd be closed down within a few days.

Actually, I've heard a similar story.  A few years ago, Burger King found out about a hamburger stand in a small town using their name.  Problem is, the stand had been using the name "Burger King" since the late 40s or early 50s, way before the nationwide brand existed.  Nevertheless, BK (more accurately, whatever corporation owned them at the time...Pepsico, I think) owned the trademark and the small hamburger stand ultimately had to change their name.

So like I said, if CC actually owns the "Kiss-FM" trademark, they could probably make a legal issue out of it, but it would cost them money they probably they probably don't want to  afford now - for very little return on investment.  What would be the point?  So they can have a "Kiss FM" in San Antonio and a few other cities? CC has much bigger problems.
« Last Edit: April 30, 2012, 11:31:31 AM by Lkeller » Logged
Dave
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3589


Re: Kiss Name
« Reply #7 on: May 01, 2012, 10:49:52 AM »

In Milwaukee, Entercom's WXSS uses the Kiss name.  CC tried to bring action to them, but Entercom fought back.  I believe CC also tried to go after Entercom over the use of The Mix name on sister station WMYX, but Entercom fought back on that as well.  So when CC started up a top 40 radio station, they had to use the Radio Now name.
Logged
FreddyE1977
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4909


Re: Kiss Name
« Reply #8 on: May 02, 2012, 01:26:44 PM »


Funny.  But you can't trademark a word, or even a name for use in everything.  For example, if I wanted to open McDonald's Dry Cleaning, I doubt I'd have any problems. But if I wanted to open an independent McDonald's fast food outlet, an army of lawyers would descend on me so fast, I'd be closed down within a few days.


Another good example was a fellow named Mike Rowe who was a programmer, and who tried to start his own
software company called Mike Rowe Soft.   

Bill Gates' lawyers swooped in and shut that down faster than you could say "blue screen of death"!
Logged
Lkeller
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 6637


Re: Kiss Name
« Reply #9 on: May 02, 2012, 05:36:26 PM »


Funny.  But you can't trademark a word, or even a name for use in everything.  For example, if I wanted to open McDonald's Dry Cleaning, I doubt I'd have any problems. But if I wanted to open an independent McDonald's fast food outlet, an army of lawyers would descend on me so fast, I'd be closed down within a few days.


Another good example was a fellow named Mike Rowe who was a programmer, and who tried to start his own
software company called Mike Rowe Soft.   

Bill Gates' lawyers swooped in and shut that down faster than you could say "blue screen of death"!

I'm not a big fan of Microsoft, but you can't blame them for that.  I don't suppose it's the same Mike Rowe who was the host of Dirty Jobs and now does Ford commercials?
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.322 seconds with 19 queries.