RadioDiscussions.com

 
Login June 19, 2013, 10:45:26 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Kiss Name  (Read 3029 times)
DavidEduardo
Internet Termite
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 24940

"“Win without boasting. Lose without excuse"


Re: Kiss Name
« Reply #10 on: May 03, 2012, 12:15:25 AM »


So like I said, if CC actually owns the "Kiss-FM" trademark, they could probably make a legal issue out of it, but it would cost them money they probably they probably don't want to  afford now - for very little return on investment.  What would be the point?  So they can have a "Kiss FM" in San Antonio and a few other cities? CC has much bigger problems.

Clear owns a number of marks, including Kiss and The Beat. They were the first to register it as a national brand... something stations did not do until the Internet ushered in national coverage via web streams.

As is the case with a number of radio brands, the first to register a brand nationally had to grant permission to continue usage to those stations with demonstrated prior usage... but only for the local market area. Thus the instances of inconsistencies... ranging from Kiss in New York to K-Love in LA.
Logged

"If you can accept losing, you can't win."
- Vince Lombardi

www.americanradiohistory.com - Broadcasting Magazine and Yearbooks and RCA Broadcast News, Television Magazine, Radio Annual, Radio News, Sponsor, and many, many more.
Lkeller
rimember

Online Online

Posts: 6682


Re: Kiss Name
« Reply #11 on: May 03, 2012, 09:10:16 AM »


So like I said, if CC actually owns the "Kiss-FM" trademark, they could probably make a legal issue out of it, but it would cost them money they probably they probably don't want to  afford now - for very little return on investment.  What would be the point?  So they can have a "Kiss FM" in San Antonio and a few other cities? CC has much bigger problems.

Clear owns a number of marks, including Kiss and The Beat. They were the first to register it as a national brand... something stations did not do until the Internet ushered in national coverage via web streams.

As is the case with a number of radio brands, the first to register a brand nationally had to grant permission to continue usage to those stations with demonstrated prior usage... but only for the local market area. Thus the instances of inconsistencies... ranging from Kiss in New York to K-Love in LA.

I do recall that KTIM-FM in San Rafael got into trouble for trademark infringement.  KTIM had been an album rock station for years, and though their signal was weak into the East Bay and San Francisco, they were loved in Marin County...they even hired a few of the celebrated KSAN rock jocks from time to time.

  Sometime in the 80s, they decided to try a Smooth Jazz format.  They called the station "The Wave," after 94.7 in Los Angeles (and possibly others) were already established.  The owners of 94.7 (not sure if it was CBS yet, or not) took exception to that.  After a few weeks of legal wrangling, KTIM became "The Tide."

In the 90s, there was another station called The Wave in San Francisco, but it was owned by CBS.
« Last Edit: May 03, 2012, 09:15:11 AM by Lkeller » Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.224 seconds with 19 queries.