RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 22, 2013, 07:49:25 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Cleveland March PPMs  (Read 461 times)
CleveFan
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 701


Cleveland March PPMs
« on: April 21, 2012, 10:32:19 AM »

From what I saw on this site, a few observations:

WDOK is tops, meaning the music, jock and image revamped worked.  I wouldn't be surprised if all dayparts, including Middays and Nights, ranked first or top three.  They do sound more Hot AC-ish.

The Fan seems to be back over the 100,000 cume mark.  Ratings not spactular, but decent, more so now that WKNR is not listed.

All the Salem stations are not listed, and neither is WERE.

The Wave is doing really well compared to when they were "V".  They're rising more and more and nipping at WZAK's audience.  Speaking of WZAK, they're slipping.

WQAL is also down, but still top five in cume.  WAKS, though, is up.  Maybe 'QAL possibly going CHR might boost that station.  WENZ is up in ratings too.

Interesting to see how the absent stations did when thrown into the mix.
Logged
wffm78
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 71


Re: Cleveland March PPMs
« Reply #1 on: April 21, 2012, 11:44:35 AM »

Ratings info less interesting since Arbitron isn't listing those stations who don't pay.   And, mix in the fact that ARB doesn't count satellite, and online in their listening figures makes radio ratings even less interesting.  I remember the day when the local papers had radio columns, and columnists, and would report the audience info, and it would be of interest to people inside and outside the industry.

Just another way that Arbitron is becoming less relevant in an industry that's doing the same.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.298 seconds with 20 queries.